Institute for Research and Education to Advance Community Health, Elson S. Floyd College of Medicine, Washington State University, Seattle, WA, USA.
Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Value Health. 2022 Dec;25(12):1929-1938. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2022.03.025. Epub 2022 May 4.
Striking disparities in access to radiation therapy (RT) exist, especially among racial and ethnic-minority patients. We analyzed census block group data to evaluate differences in travel distance to RT as a function of race and ethnicity, socioeconomic status, and rurality.
The Directory of Radiotherapy Centers provided the addresses of facilities containing linear accelerators for RT. We classified block groups as majority (≥ 50%) American Indian/Alaska Native (AI/AN), black, white, Asian, no single racial majority, or Hispanic regardless of race. We used the Area Deprivation Index to classify deprivation and Rural-Urban Commuting Area codes to classify rurality. Generalized linear mixed models tested associations between these factors and distance to nearest RT facility.
Median distance to nearest RT facility was 72 miles in AI/AN-majority block groups, but 4 to 7 miles in block groups with non-AI/AN majorities. Multivariable models estimated that travel distances in AI/AN-majority block groups were 39 to 41 miles longer than in areas with non-AI/AN majorities. Travel distance was 1.3 miles longer in the more deprived areas versus less deprived areas and 16 to 32 miles longer in micropolitan, small town, and rural areas versus metropolitan areas.
Cancer patients in block groups with AI/AN-majority populations, nonmetropolitan location, and low socioeconomic status experience substantial travel disparities in access to RT. Future research with more granular community- and individual-level data should explore the many other known barriers to access to cancer care and their relationship to the barriers posed by distance to RT care.
放疗(RT)的可及性存在显著差异,尤其是在种族和少数民族患者中。我们分析了普查街区组数据,以评估作为种族和民族、社会经济地位和农村程度的函数,到 RT 的旅行距离差异。
放射治疗中心名录提供了含有线性加速器的设施的地址。我们将街区组分类为主要为(≥50%)美洲印第安人/阿拉斯加原住民(AI/AN)、黑人、白人、亚洲人、无单一主要种族或西班牙裔,无论其种族如何。我们使用区域剥夺指数来分类贫困程度,使用城乡通勤区代码来分类农村程度。广义线性混合模型测试了这些因素与最近的 RT 设施之间的距离之间的关联。
AI/AN 主要街区组的最近 RT 设施的中位数距离为 72 英里,但非 AI/AN 主要街区组的距离为 4 至 7 英里。多变量模型估计,AI/AN 主要街区组的旅行距离比非 AI/AN 主要街区组长 39 至 41 英里。在较贫困地区,旅行距离比较富裕地区长 1.3 英里,在中小城市和农村地区比大都市区长 16 至 32 英里。
在 AI/AN 主要人口、非大都市位置和社会经济地位较低的街区组中,癌症患者在获得 RT 方面面临着显著的旅行差距。未来应该使用更精细的社区和个人层面的数据进行研究,以探索获得癌症治疗的许多其他已知障碍及其与 RT 护理距离障碍的关系。