Suppr超能文献

宫颈癌门诊低剂量镇静混合近距离放射治疗的可行性:单机构方案的结果

Feasibility of outpatient hybrid brachytherapy for cervical cancer with minimal sedation: Results from a single-institutional protocol.

作者信息

Mutyala Subhakar, Smith Gabriella, Ansinelli Hayden, Thawani Nitika

机构信息

Arizona Center for Cancer Care, Scottsdale, AZ, USA.

University of Arizona College of Medicine - Phoenix, AZ, USA.

出版信息

J Contemp Brachytherapy. 2023 Feb;15(1):43-47. doi: 10.5114/jcb.2023.125527. Epub 2023 Feb 28.

Abstract

PURPOSE

Pain control techniques during high-dose-rate hybrid intracavitary-interstitial brachytherapy (HBT) for cervical cancer vary widely, with many centers opting for general anesthesia (GA) or conscious sedation (CS). Here, we describe a single-institutional series of patients treated with HBT and ASA-defined minimal sedation, utilizing oral analgesic and anxiolytic medications in substitution for GA or CS.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

The charts of patients who underwent HBT treatments for cervical cancer from June 2018 to May 2020 were retrospectively reviewed. Prior to HBT, all patients underwent an exam under anesthesia (EUA), and Smit sleeve placement under general anesthesia or deep sedation. Oral lorazepam and oxycodone/acetaminophen were administered between 30-90 minutes before HBT procedure for minimal sedation. HBT placement was performed on computed tomography (CT) table, with needle advancement under CT-guidance.

RESULTS

Treatments with minimal sedation were attempted in 63 patients. A total of 244 interstitial implants with 453 needles were placed via CT-guidance. Sixty-one patients (96.8%) tolerated the procedure without any additional intervention, while two patients (3.2%) required the use of epidural anesthesia. None of the patients in the series required a transition to general anesthesia for the procedure. Bleeding, which resolved with short-term vaginal packing, occurred in 22.1% of insertions.

CONCLUSIONS

In our series, the treatment of HBT for cervical cancer with minimal sedation was feasible at a high percentage (96.8%). The ability to perform HBT without GA or CS could be a reasonable option to provide image-guided adaptive brachytherapy (IGABT) with limited resources, allowing for more widespread use. Further investigations using this technique are warranted.

摘要

目的

在宫颈癌高剂量率腔内-组织间插植近距离放疗(HBT)期间,疼痛控制技术差异很大,许多中心选择全身麻醉(GA)或清醒镇静(CS)。在此,我们描述了一组在单一机构接受HBT治疗且采用美国麻醉医师协会(ASA)定义的最小镇静的患者系列,使用口服镇痛药和抗焦虑药物替代GA或CS。

材料与方法

回顾性分析2018年6月至2020年5月接受宫颈癌HBT治疗患者的病历。在HBT之前,所有患者均接受了麻醉下检查(EUA),并在全身麻醉或深度镇静下放置施密特套管。在HBT程序前30 - 90分钟给予口服劳拉西泮和羟考酮/对乙酰氨基酚以达到最小镇静。HBT插植在计算机断层扫描(CT)台上进行,在CT引导下推进针。

结果

对63例患者尝试了最小镇静治疗。通过CT引导共放置了244个组织间植入物,使用了453根针。61例患者(96.8%)耐受该程序,无需任何额外干预,而2例患者(3.2%)需要使用硬膜外麻醉。该系列中没有患者在该程序中需要转为全身麻醉。22.1%的插植发生了出血,通过短期阴道填塞得以解决。

结论

在我们的系列研究中,高比例(96.8%)的宫颈癌HBT最小镇静治疗是可行的。在没有GA或CS的情况下进行HBT的能力可能是在资源有限的情况下提供图像引导适应性近距离放疗(IGABT)的合理选择,从而使其能够更广泛地应用。有必要对该技术进行进一步研究。

相似文献

本文引用的文献

3
Increasing global accessibility to high-level treatments for cervical cancers.提高全球获得宫颈癌高级治疗的可及性。
Gynecol Oncol. 2022 Jan;164(1):231-241. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2021.10.073. Epub 2021 Oct 27.
5
Geographic access to brachytherapy services in the United States.美国近距离放射疗法服务的地理可达性。
Brachytherapy. 2022 Jan-Feb;21(1):29-32. doi: 10.1016/j.brachy.2021.05.004. Epub 2021 Jun 18.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验