Packer M
Drugs. 1986;32 Suppl 5:13-26. doi: 10.2165/00003495-198600325-00003.
The rationale for the use of vasodilating agents in the treatment of congestive heart failure is to reverse the systemic vasoconstriction that characterises patients with this disorder, and which may further limit cardiac performance. Nitrates were the first vasodilators used, followed by arterial vasodilators (hydralazine, minoxidil), alpha-adrenergic blockers (prazosin, trimazosin) and, more recently, calcium antagonists, ACE inhibitors, beta-agonists and phosphodiesterase inhibitors. The choice of vasodilator should be based on consideration of overall benefit-risk profiles. Consideration of pharmacological action together with classification of patients into haemodynamic subsets has been used as a basis from which to initiate vasodilator therapy. However, such a classification may not lead to a logical choice of drug and there is no evidence to suggest that patients so selected do better when given long term treatment with peripherally specific drugs than with agents that are not tailored to pretreatment haemodynamic variables. Moreover, changes in central haemodynamics after administration of specific vasodilator drugs may differ from those expected on the basis of their presumed actions on the peripheral vasculature. Dosage requirements are difficult to predict with many vasodilator drugs. Traditionally, such requirements have been established by titrating vasodilating drugs to achieve an arbitrarily defined haemodynamic response. However, there is little correlation between haemodynamic end-points and clinical efficacy in patients with heart failure, and short and long term haemodynamic responses to vasodilator drugs are not necessarily related. Drug-specific haemodynamic and clinical tolerance occurs during the course of treatment with all vasodilator drugs; the extent and frequency with which it develops differs between agents. Tolerance is thought to arise from a reduction in drug receptor affinity and/or density or activation of counter-regulatory forces (mainly neurohormonal) that limit the magnitude of vasodilatation that can be achieved. Development of tolerance to a single agent does not usually preclude efficacy of other agents. ACE inhibitors have been associated with a relatively low incidence of tolerance. This may relate to their natriuretic effect and ability to decrease the degree of neurohormonal activation, actions not shared by other vasodilators. Tolerance is the principal reason for failure of prazosin and nitrates as therapeutic agents in severe chronic heart failure.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)
在治疗充血性心力衰竭时使用血管扩张剂的基本原理是逆转全身性血管收缩,这种血管收缩是该疾病患者的特征,并且可能进一步限制心脏功能。硝酸盐是最早使用的血管扩张剂,随后是动脉血管扩张剂(肼屈嗪、米诺地尔)、α-肾上腺素能阻滞剂(哌唑嗪、曲马唑嗪),以及最近的钙拮抗剂、血管紧张素转换酶(ACE)抑制剂、β-激动剂和磷酸二酯酶抑制剂。血管扩张剂的选择应基于对整体获益-风险状况的考虑。将药理作用与患者分类为血流动力学亚组相结合已被用作启动血管扩张剂治疗的基础。然而,这样的分类可能不会导致合理的药物选择,并且没有证据表明,与未根据治疗前血流动力学变量量身定制的药物相比,长期使用外周特异性药物治疗时,如此选择的患者效果更好。此外,给予特定血管扩张剂药物后中心血流动力学的变化可能与基于它们对外周血管系统的假定作用所预期的变化不同。许多血管扩张剂药物的剂量需求难以预测。传统上,通过滴定血管扩张剂药物来确定这样的需求,以实现任意定义的血流动力学反应。然而,在心力衰竭患者中,血流动力学终点与临床疗效之间几乎没有相关性,并且血管扩张剂药物的短期和长期血流动力学反应不一定相关。在所有血管扩张剂药物的治疗过程中都会出现药物特异性的血流动力学和临床耐受性;其发生的程度和频率因药物而异。耐受性被认为是由于药物受体亲和力和/或密度降低,和/或限制可实现的血管扩张幅度的反调节力量(主要是神经激素)的激活所致。对单一药物产生耐受性通常并不排除其他药物的疗效。ACE抑制剂与相对较低的耐受性发生率相关。这可能与其利钠作用以及降低神经激素激活程度的能力有关,而其他血管扩张剂没有这些作用。耐受性是哌唑嗪和硝酸盐作为严重慢性心力衰竭治疗药物失败的主要原因。(摘要截选至400词)