Suppr超能文献

自动化发药柜Override——儿科急诊中的必要性评估。

Automated Dispensing Cabinet Overrides-An Evaluation of Necessity in a Pediatric Emergency Department.

出版信息

J Emerg Nurs. 2022 May;48(3):319-327. doi: 10.1016/j.jen.2022.01.007.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Automated dispensing cabinets, or ADCs, are often used at health care facilities to aid in the medication-use process. Although ADCs minimize certain medication errors, they introduce a new type of error involving overrides. Although helpful when used appropriately in emergencies, overrides bypass pharmacist verification and increase potential for patient harm through drug-drug interactions, medication allergies, inappropriate dosing, and more. The purpose of this study was to evaluate automated dispensing cabinets override pulls in a pediatric hospital's emergency department. The authors sought to discover whether overridden medications were being administered before verification (indicating it was needed emergently, thus justifying override) or after verification (indicating the override did not result in quicker administration and/or the medication was not emergent).

METHODS

This was a retrospective, observational study. Data were collected from electronic health record reports from a 343-bed pediatric hospital's emergency department from October 13, 2019, to December 22, 2019.

RESULTS

A total of 445 override pulls were identified during this time, and after data analysis, 99 override pulls remained in the data set. Overall, time from input of prescription into the electronic medical record to medication override was approximately 4 minutes. Pharmacist verification also took a median of four minutes after prescription input. However, administration took twice as long, at 8 minutes. On average, pharmacist verification occurred 4 minutes before medication administration.

CONCLUSION

This research from a pediatric emergency department suggests that most situations did not require an immediate administration, and perhaps an override was unnecessary and could have been avoided.

摘要

目的

自动配药柜(ADC)常用于医疗保健机构,以辅助用药过程。虽然 ADC 最小化了某些用药错误,但它们引入了一种新的错误类型,即覆盖。尽管在紧急情况下适当使用时会有所帮助,但覆盖绕过了药师的验证,增加了药物相互作用、药物过敏、用药不当等导致患者伤害的可能性。本研究旨在评估儿科医院急诊科自动配药柜的覆盖抽取情况。作者旨在发现被覆盖的药物是在验证之前(表明紧急需要,从而证明覆盖是合理的)还是在验证之后(表明覆盖并没有导致更快的给药,或者药物不是紧急的)被给予。

方法

这是一项回顾性、观察性研究。数据来自 2019 年 10 月 13 日至 12 月 22 日期间一家 343 张病床的儿科医院急诊科的电子病历报告。

结果

在此期间共发现 445 次覆盖抽取,经过数据分析,99 次覆盖抽取保留在数据集中。总体而言,从处方输入到电子病历到药物覆盖的时间约为 4 分钟。药师验证也在处方输入后中位数为 4 分钟。然而,给药时间延长了一倍,为 8 分钟。平均而言,药师验证发生在给药前 4 分钟。

结论

这项来自儿科急诊科的研究表明,大多数情况下不需要立即给药,也许覆盖是不必要的,可以避免。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验