• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

自然灾害如何影响碳排放:全球案例

How natural disasters affect carbon emissions: the global case.

作者信息

Dou Yue, Shahbaz Muhammad, Dong Kangyin, Dong Xiucheng

机构信息

School of International Trade and Economics, Business and Economics, University of International, Beijing, 100029 China.

UIBE Belt and Road Energy Trade and Development Center, University of International Business and Economics, Beijing, 100029 China.

出版信息

Nat Hazards (Dordr). 2022;113(3):1875-1901. doi: 10.1007/s11069-022-05374-z. Epub 2022 May 2.

DOI:10.1007/s11069-022-05374-z
PMID:35528389
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9060415/
Abstract

The outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic has once again made the impacts of natural disasters a hot topic in academia. The environmental impacts of natural disasters, however, remain unsettled in the existing literature. This study aims to investigate the impact of natural disasters on CO emissions. For this purpose, we employ a panel dataset covering 138 countries over the period 1990-2018 and two dynamic panel estimation methods. Then, considering the differences in CO emissions across various countries, we run a panel quantile regression to examine the asymmetry in the nexus between natural disasters and CO emissions. We also discuss the mediating effects of energy consumption between natural disasters and CO emissions. After conducting a series of robustness checks, we confirm that our results are stable and convincing. The empirical results indicate that natural disasters significantly reduce CO emissions. Nevertheless, the impact of natural disasters on CO emissions is asymmetric across different quantiles of CO emissions. Furthermore, the technology level serves as an important moderating factor between natural disasters and CO emissions. The mediating effect results reveal that natural disasters not only directly reduce CO emissions but also indirectly promote carbon reduction by restraining energy consumption. Finally, several policy implications are provided to reduce CO emissions and the damage caused by natural disasters.

摘要

新冠疫情的爆发再次使自然灾害的影响成为学术界的热门话题。然而,自然灾害对环境的影响在现有文献中仍未得到解决。本研究旨在调查自然灾害对一氧化碳排放的影响。为此,我们使用了一个涵盖1990年至2018年期间138个国家的面板数据集和两种动态面板估计方法。然后,考虑到各国一氧化碳排放的差异,我们进行了面板分位数回归,以检验自然灾害与一氧化碳排放之间关系的不对称性。我们还讨论了能源消耗在自然灾害与一氧化碳排放之间的中介作用。在进行了一系列稳健性检验后,我们证实我们的结果是稳定且有说服力的。实证结果表明,自然灾害显著降低了一氧化碳排放。然而,自然灾害对一氧化碳排放的影响在一氧化碳排放的不同分位数上是不对称的。此外,技术水平是自然灾害与一氧化碳排放之间的一个重要调节因素。中介效应结果表明,自然灾害不仅直接降低了一氧化碳排放,还通过抑制能源消耗间接促进了碳减排。最后,我们提出了一些政策建议,以减少一氧化碳排放和自然灾害造成的损害。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cf9d/9060415/6b32e04e78e8/11069_2022_5374_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cf9d/9060415/aaf9a509189e/11069_2022_5374_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cf9d/9060415/d3ae1f1803d2/11069_2022_5374_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cf9d/9060415/6b32e04e78e8/11069_2022_5374_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cf9d/9060415/aaf9a509189e/11069_2022_5374_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cf9d/9060415/d3ae1f1803d2/11069_2022_5374_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cf9d/9060415/6b32e04e78e8/11069_2022_5374_Fig3_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
How natural disasters affect carbon emissions: the global case.自然灾害如何影响碳排放:全球案例
Nat Hazards (Dordr). 2022;113(3):1875-1901. doi: 10.1007/s11069-022-05374-z. Epub 2022 May 2.
2
Nexus among the hydropower energy consumption, economic growth, and CO emissions: evidence from BRICS countries.水电能源消耗、经济增长与 CO 排放的关系:金砖国家的证据。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2019 Dec;26(34):35010-35022. doi: 10.1007/s11356-019-06638-1. Epub 2019 Oct 30.
3
How does technological innovation mitigate CO emissions in OECD countries? Heterogeneous analysis using panel quantile regression.技术创新如何减轻经合组织国家的二氧化碳排放?面板分位数回归的异质分析。
J Environ Manage. 2021 Feb 15;280:111818. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.111818. Epub 2020 Dec 23.
4
The impact of democracy and income on CO emissions in MINT countries: evidence from quantile regression model.民主和收入对 MINT 国家二氧化碳排放的影响:来自分位数回归模型的证据。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2023 Apr;30(18):52762-52783. doi: 10.1007/s11356-023-25805-z. Epub 2023 Feb 27.
5
Asymmetric effect of electricity consumption on CO emissions in the USA: analysis of end-user electricity consumption by nonlinear quantile approaches.美国电力消费对 CO 排放的非对称影响:基于非线性分位数方法的终端用户电力消费分析。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2022 Nov;29(55):83824-83838. doi: 10.1007/s11356-022-21715-8. Epub 2022 Jun 30.
6
Do economic policy uncertainty and geopolitical risk surge CO emissions? New insights from panel quantile regression approach.经济政策不确定性和地缘政治风险是否会导致二氧化碳排放增加?面板分位数回归方法的新见解。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2022 Apr;29(19):27845-27861. doi: 10.1007/s11356-021-17707-9. Epub 2022 Jan 4.
7
Analysis of CO emissions and energy consumption by sources in MENA countries: evidence from quantile regressions.中东和北非国家各来源的一氧化碳排放与能源消耗分析:分位数回归的证据
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2021 Aug;28(29):38901-38908. doi: 10.1007/s11356-021-13356-0. Epub 2021 Mar 20.
8
Revisiting global energy efficiency and CO emission nexus: fresh evidence from the panel quantile regression model.重新审视全球能源效率与 CO 排放关系:来自面板分位数回归模型的新证据。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2022 Jul;29(31):47502-47515. doi: 10.1007/s11356-022-19101-5. Epub 2022 Feb 19.
9
Heterogeneous impacts of renewable energy and environmental patents on CO emission - Evidence from the BRIICS.可再生能源和环境专利对 CO 排放的异质影响——来自“金砖国家”的证据。
Sci Total Environ. 2019 Jun 10;668:1328-1338. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.02.063. Epub 2019 Feb 10.
10
Asymmetric impact of pandemics-related uncertainty on CO emissions: evidence from top-10 polluted countries.大流行相关不确定性对一氧化碳排放的不对称影响:来自十大污染国家的证据。
Stoch Environ Res Risk Assess. 2022;36(12):4103-4117. doi: 10.1007/s00477-022-02248-5. Epub 2022 Jul 16.

引用本文的文献

1
Environmental regulations and agricultural carbon emissions efficiency: Evidence from rural China.环境规制与农业碳排放效率:来自中国农村的证据
Heliyon. 2024 Feb 6;10(4):e25677. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e25677. eCollection 2024 Feb 29.

本文引用的文献

1
Changes in energy consumption according to building use type under COVID-19 pandemic in South Korea.韩国新冠疫情期间不同建筑使用类型的能源消耗变化
Renew Sustain Energy Rev. 2021 Sep;148:111294. doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2021.111294. Epub 2021 Jun 4.
2
The relationship between urbanization, technology innovation, trade openness, and CO emissions: evidence from a panel of Asian countries.城市化、技术创新、贸易开放与 CO 排放之间的关系:来自亚洲国家面板数据的证据。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2020 Oct;27(28):35349-35363. doi: 10.1007/s11356-020-09777-y. Epub 2020 Jun 27.
3
A system dynamics approach to scenario analysis for urban passenger transport energy consumption and CO emissions: A case study of Beijing.
一种用于城市客运能源消耗和碳排放情景分析的系统动力学方法:以北京为例
Energy Policy. 2015 Oct;85:253-270. doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2015.06.007. Epub 2015 Jun 18.
4
The effects of natural disasters on international tourism: A global analysis.自然灾害对国际旅游业的影响:一项全球分析。
Tour Manag. 2020 Aug;79:104080. doi: 10.1016/j.tourman.2020.104080. Epub 2020 Feb 1.
5
Climate and poverty in Africa South of the Sahara.撒哈拉以南非洲的气候与贫困
World Dev. 2020 Jan;125:104691. doi: 10.1016/j.worlddev.2019.104691.
6
Financial development, globalization, and CO emission in the presence of EKC: evidence from BRICS countries.金融发展、全球化与 CO 排放的 EKC 关系:金砖国家的证据。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2018 Nov;25(31):31283-31296. doi: 10.1007/s11356-018-3034-7. Epub 2018 Sep 7.
7
Effects of population and affluence on CO2 emissions.人口与富裕程度对二氧化碳排放的影响。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1997 Jan 7;94(1):175-9. doi: 10.1073/pnas.94.1.175.