• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

分析社交媒体数据中新冠疫情前后的疫苗接种辩论。

Analyzing the vaccination debate in social media data Pre- and Post-COVID-19 pandemic.

作者信息

Chen Qingqing, Crooks Andrew

机构信息

Department of Geography, University at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY, USA.

出版信息

Int J Appl Earth Obs Geoinf. 2022 Jun;110:102783. doi: 10.1016/j.jag.2022.102783. Epub 2022 May 5.

DOI:10.1016/j.jag.2022.102783
PMID:35528967
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9069236/
Abstract

The COVID-19 virus has caused and continues to cause unprecedented impacts on the life trajectories of millions of people globally. Recently, to combat the transmission of the virus, vaccination campaigns around the world have become prevalent. However, while many see such campaigns as positive (e.g., protecting lives), others see them as negative (e.g., the side effects that are not fully understood scientifically), resulting in diverse sentiments towards vaccination campaigns. In addition, the diverse sentiments have seldom been systematically quantified let alone their dynamic changes over space and time. To shed light on this issue, we propose an approach to analyze vaccine sentiments in space and time by using supervised machine learning combined with word embedding techniques. Taking the United States as a test case, we utilize a Twitter dataset (approximately 11.7 million tweets) from January 2015 to July 2021 and measure and map vaccine sentiments (Pro-vaccine, Anti-vaccine, and Neutral) across the nation. In doing so, we can capture the heterogeneous public opinions within social media discussions regarding vaccination among states. Results show how positive sentiment in social media has a strong correlation with the actual vaccinated population. Furthermore, we introduce a simple ratio between Anti and Pro-vaccine as a proxy to quantify vaccine hesitancy and show how our results align with other traditional survey approaches. The proposed approach illustrates the potential to monitor the dynamics of vaccine opinion distribution online, which we hope, can be helpful to explain vaccination rates for the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic.

摘要

新冠病毒已经并将继续对全球数百万人的生活轨迹造成前所未有的影响。最近,为了抗击病毒传播,全球范围内的疫苗接种活动盛行。然而,尽管许多人认为此类活动是积极的(例如,拯救生命),但也有人认为它们是消极的(例如,科学上尚未完全了解的副作用),这导致了人们对疫苗接种活动的不同看法。此外,这些不同看法很少得到系统量化,更不用说它们在空间和时间上的动态变化了。为了阐明这个问题,我们提出了一种方法,通过使用监督机器学习结合词嵌入技术来分析疫苗看法在空间和时间上的情况。以美国为例,我们利用了2015年1月至2021年7月的推特数据集(约1170万条推文),并测量和绘制了全国范围内的疫苗看法(支持疫苗、反对疫苗和中立)。这样做,我们可以捕捉社交媒体讨论中各州关于疫苗接种的不同公众意见。结果表明社交媒体中的积极情绪与实际接种人群之间存在很强的相关性。此外,我们引入了一个简单的反疫苗与支持疫苗的比例作为代理来量化疫苗犹豫,并展示我们的结果如何与其他传统调查方法一致。所提出的方法说明了在线监测疫苗意见分布动态的潜力,我们希望这有助于解释当前新冠疫情的疫苗接种率。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d0dd/9069236/dae69dbb2546/gr7_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d0dd/9069236/88c272d848f4/gr1_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d0dd/9069236/1d3e73e68fb9/gr2_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d0dd/9069236/6d8d14967bfa/gr3_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d0dd/9069236/869067566ad0/gr4_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d0dd/9069236/2eb4c885bac7/gr5_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d0dd/9069236/8f963f768ee0/gr6_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d0dd/9069236/dae69dbb2546/gr7_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d0dd/9069236/88c272d848f4/gr1_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d0dd/9069236/1d3e73e68fb9/gr2_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d0dd/9069236/6d8d14967bfa/gr3_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d0dd/9069236/869067566ad0/gr4_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d0dd/9069236/2eb4c885bac7/gr5_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d0dd/9069236/8f963f768ee0/gr6_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d0dd/9069236/dae69dbb2546/gr7_lrg.jpg

相似文献

1
Analyzing the vaccination debate in social media data Pre- and Post-COVID-19 pandemic.分析社交媒体数据中新冠疫情前后的疫苗接种辩论。
Int J Appl Earth Obs Geoinf. 2022 Jun;110:102783. doi: 10.1016/j.jag.2022.102783. Epub 2022 May 5.
2
Vaccine sentiment analysis using BERT + NBSVM and geo-spatial approaches.使用BERT + NBSVM和地理空间方法的疫苗情绪分析。
J Supercomput. 2023 May 7:1-31. doi: 10.1007/s11227-023-05319-8.
3
Tracking Public Attitudes Toward COVID-19 Vaccination on Tweets in Canada: Using Aspect-Based Sentiment Analysis.追踪加拿大推特上公众对 COVID-19 疫苗接种的态度:使用基于方面的情感分析。
J Med Internet Res. 2022 Mar 29;24(3):e35016. doi: 10.2196/35016.
4
Social media sentiment analysis to monitor the performance of vaccination coverage during the early phase of the national COVID-19 vaccine rollout.社交媒体情绪分析监测全国 COVID-19 疫苗推广初期的疫苗接种覆盖率表现。
Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 2022 Jun;221:106838. doi: 10.1016/j.cmpb.2022.106838. Epub 2022 Apr 27.
5
COVID-19 Vaccine-Related Discussion on Twitter: Topic Modeling and Sentiment Analysis.新冠疫苗相关推文的讨论:主题建模和情感分析。
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Jun 29;23(6):e24435. doi: 10.2196/24435.
6
Examining Public Sentiments and Attitudes Toward COVID-19 Vaccination: Infoveillance Study Using Twitter Posts.审视公众对新冠疫苗接种的情绪和态度:利用推特帖子的信息监测研究
JMIR Infodemiology. 2022 Apr 15;2(1):e33909. doi: 10.2196/33909. eCollection 2022 Jan-Jun.
7
Examining the Utility of Social Media in COVID-19 Vaccination: Unsupervised Learning of 672,133 Twitter Posts.社交媒体在新冠疫苗接种中的应用研究:对 672,133 条推特帖子的无监督学习。
JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2021 Nov 3;7(11):e29789. doi: 10.2196/29789.
8
Uncovering the Reasons Behind COVID-19 Vaccine Hesitancy in Serbia: Sentiment-Based Topic Modeling.揭示塞尔维亚人对 COVID-19 疫苗犹豫不决的原因:基于情绪的主题建模。
J Med Internet Res. 2022 Nov 17;24(11):e42261. doi: 10.2196/42261.
9
Tweet Topics and Sentiments Relating to COVID-19 Vaccination Among Australian Twitter Users: Machine Learning Analysis.澳大利亚推特用户与 COVID-19 疫苗接种相关的推文主题和情绪:机器学习分析。
J Med Internet Res. 2021 May 19;23(5):e26953. doi: 10.2196/26953.
10
Actions Speak Louder Than Words: Sentiment and Topic Analysis of COVID-19 Vaccination on Twitter and Vaccine Uptake.行动胜于言语:推特上关于新冠疫苗接种的情绪与主题分析及疫苗接种情况
JMIR Form Res. 2022 Sep 15;6(9):e37775. doi: 10.2196/37775.

引用本文的文献

1
Understanding the determinants of vaccine hesitancy in the United States: A comparison of social surveys and social media.了解美国疫苗犹豫的决定因素:社交媒体与社会调查的比较。
PLoS One. 2024 Jun 6;19(6):e0301488. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0301488. eCollection 2024.
2
Lexicon-based sentiment analysis to detect opinions and attitude towards COVID-19 vaccines on Twitter in Italy.基于词典的情感分析来检测意大利推特上对 COVID-19 疫苗的意见和态度。
Comput Biol Med. 2023 May;158:106876. doi: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2023.106876. Epub 2023 Apr 5.
3
A comparison between online social media discussions and vaccination rates: A tale of four vaccines.

本文引用的文献

1
Impacts of worldwide individual non-pharmaceutical interventions on COVID-19 transmission across waves and space.全球个体非药物干预措施对新冠病毒在不同波次和空间传播的影响。
Int J Appl Earth Obs Geoinf. 2022 Feb;106:102649. doi: 10.1016/j.jag.2021.102649.
2
Quantifying the effect of Wakefield et al. (1998) on skepticism about MMR vaccine safety in the U.S.量化 Wakefield 等人(1998 年)对美国对 MMR 疫苗安全性的怀疑的影响
PLoS One. 2021 Aug 19;16(8):e0256395. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0256395. eCollection 2021.
3
Revealing Public Opinion Towards COVID-19 Vaccines With Twitter Data in the United States: Spatiotemporal Perspective.
在线社交媒体讨论与疫苗接种率之间的比较:四种疫苗的故事。
Digit Health. 2023 Feb 8;9:20552076231155682. doi: 10.1177/20552076231155682. eCollection 2023 Jan-Dec.
4
Information propagation on cyber, relational and physical spaces about covid-19 vaccine: Using social media and splatial framework.关于新冠疫苗在网络、社交及物理空间的信息传播:利用社交媒体和空间框架
Comput Environ Urban Syst. 2022 Dec;98:101887. doi: 10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2022.101887. Epub 2022 Sep 14.
利用美国推特数据揭示公众对 COVID-19 疫苗的看法:时空透视。
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Sep 10;23(9):e30854. doi: 10.2196/30854.
4
Deliberation, Dissent, and Distrust: Understanding Distinct Drivers of Coronavirus Disease 2019 Vaccine Hesitancy in the United States.慎重考虑、异议和不信任:理解美国 2019 年冠状病毒病疫苗犹豫的不同驱动因素。
Clin Infect Dis. 2022 Apr 28;74(8):1429-1441. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciab633.
5
An analysis of COVID-19 vaccine sentiments and opinions on Twitter.对 Twitter 上有关 COVID-19 疫苗情绪和观点的分析。
Int J Infect Dis. 2021 Jul;108:256-262. doi: 10.1016/j.ijid.2021.05.059. Epub 2021 May 27.
6
COVID-19, a worldwide public health emergency.COVID-19,一场全球性的公共卫生紧急事件。
Rev Clin Esp (Barc). 2021 Jan;221(1):55-61. doi: 10.1016/j.rceng.2020.03.001. Epub 2020 Apr 21.
7
Vaccine side-effects and SARS-CoV-2 infection after vaccination in users of the COVID Symptom Study app in the UK: a prospective observational study.英国COVID症状研究应用程序使用者接种疫苗后的疫苗副作用和SARS-CoV-2感染:一项前瞻性观察研究。
Lancet Infect Dis. 2021 Jul;21(7):939-949. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(21)00224-3. Epub 2021 Apr 27.
8
Evidence-Based Strategies for Clinical Organizations to Address COVID-19 Vaccine Hesitancy.临床机构应对新冠疫苗犹豫问题的循证策略。
Mayo Clin Proc. 2021 Mar;96(3):699-707. doi: 10.1016/j.mayocp.2020.12.024. Epub 2020 Dec 30.
9
The COVID-19 pandemic: Impacts on cities and major lessons for urban planning, design, and management.新型冠状病毒肺炎疫情:对城市的影响及对城市规划、设计和管理的主要启示。
Sci Total Environ. 2020 Dec 20;749:142391. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.142391. Epub 2020 Sep 18.
10
Oxford COVID-vaccine paper highlights lingering unknowns about results.牛津大学关于新冠疫苗的论文凸显了研究结果中仍存在的未知因素。
Nature. 2020 Dec;588(7838):378-379. doi: 10.1038/d41586-020-03504-w.