Department of Computer Science, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
British Columbia Centre for Disease Control, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
J Med Internet Res. 2022 Mar 29;24(3):e35016. doi: 10.2196/35016.
The development and approval of COVID-19 vaccines have generated optimism for the end of the COVID-19 pandemic and a return to normalcy. However, vaccine hesitancy, often fueled by misinformation, poses a major barrier to achieving herd immunity.
We aim to investigate Twitter users' attitudes toward COVID-19 vaccination in Canada after vaccine rollout.
We applied a weakly supervised aspect-based sentiment analysis (ABSA) technique, which involves the human-in-the-loop system, on COVID-19 vaccination-related tweets in Canada. Automatically generated aspect and opinion terms were manually corrected by public health experts to ensure the accuracy of the terms and make them more domain-specific. Then, based on these manually corrected terms, the system inferred sentiments toward the aspects. We observed sentiments toward key aspects related to COVID-19 vaccination, and investigated how sentiments toward "vaccination" changed over time. In addition, we analyzed the most retweeted or liked tweets by observing most frequent nouns and sentiments toward key aspects.
After applying the ABSA system, we obtained 170 aspect terms (eg, "immunity" and "pfizer") and 6775 opinion terms (eg, "trustworthy" for the positive sentiment and "jeopardize" for the negative sentiment). While manually verifying or editing these terms, our public health experts selected 20 key aspects related to COVID-19 vaccination for analysis. The sentiment analysis results for the 20 key aspects revealed negative sentiments related to "vaccine distribution," "side effects," "allergy," "reactions," and "anti-vaxxer," and positive sentiments related to "vaccine campaign," "vaccine candidates," and "immune response." These results indicate that the Twitter users express concerns about the safety of vaccines but still consider vaccines as the option to end the pandemic. In addition, compared to the sentiment of the remaining tweets, the most retweeted or liked tweets showed more positive sentiment overall toward key aspects (P<.001), especially vaccines (P<.001) and vaccination (P=.009). Further investigation of the most retweeted or liked tweets revealed two opposing trends in Twitter users who showed negative sentiments toward vaccines: the "anti-vaxxer" population that used negative sentiments as a means to discourage vaccination and the "Covid Zero" population that used negative sentiments to encourage vaccinations while critiquing the public health response.
Our study examined public sentiments toward COVID-19 vaccination on tweets over an extended period in Canada. Our findings could inform public health agencies to design and implement interventions to promote vaccination.
新冠疫苗的研发和获批为结束新冠大流行和恢复正常生活带来了乐观情绪。然而,疫苗犹豫情绪常常受到错误信息的推动,这是实现群体免疫的主要障碍。
我们旨在研究加拿大疫苗推出后,推特用户对新冠疫苗接种的态度。
我们在加拿大应用了一种弱监督的基于方面的情感分析(ABSA)技术,该技术涉及人工参与的系统。该系统自动生成与新冠疫苗接种相关的推文的方面和意见术语,并由公共卫生专家手动纠正,以确保术语的准确性并使其更具针对性。然后,根据这些手动纠正的术语,系统推断出对这些方面的情感。我们观察了与新冠疫苗接种相关的关键方面的情感,并研究了随着时间的推移,人们对“疫苗接种”的情感变化。此外,我们通过观察最常提及的名词和关键方面的情感,分析了最受转发或点赞的推文。
应用 ABSA 系统后,我们获得了 170 个方面术语(例如,“免疫”和“辉瑞”)和 6775 个意见术语(例如,“值得信赖”表示积极情感,“危及”表示消极情感)。在验证或编辑这些术语时,我们的公共卫生专家选择了 20 个与新冠疫苗接种相关的关键方面进行分析。对 20 个关键方面的情感分析结果表明,人们对“疫苗分发”、“副作用”、“过敏”、“反应”和“反疫苗者”等方面持负面情绪,而对“疫苗接种活动”、“疫苗候选物”和“免疫反应”等方面持积极情绪。这些结果表明,推特用户对疫苗的安全性表示担忧,但仍将疫苗视为结束大流行的选择。此外,与剩余推文的情感相比,最受转发或点赞的推文总体上对关键方面表现出更积极的情感(P<.001),尤其是对疫苗(P<.001)和疫苗接种(P=.009)。对最受转发或点赞的推文进行进一步调查发现,推特用户对疫苗持负面情绪存在两种相反的趋势:一种是“反疫苗者”群体,他们使用负面情绪来劝阻接种疫苗;另一种是“零新冠”群体,他们使用负面情绪来鼓励接种疫苗,同时批评公共卫生应对措施。
我们的研究在加拿大对推特上的新冠疫苗接种进行了长时间的公众情绪调查。我们的研究结果可以为公共卫生机构设计和实施促进疫苗接种的干预措施提供信息。