Shaya Nessrin, Abu Khait Rawan, Madani Rehaf, Khattak Mohammad Nisar
College of Education, American University in the Emirates, International Academic City, Dubai, UAE.
American University in the Emirates, Dubai, UAE.
High Educ Policy. 2022 May 3:1-27. doi: 10.1057/s41307-022-00272-2.
Resilient organizations and academic institutions have been identified as contributing immensely to resilient communities. The majority of organizations showing preparedness to mitigate the impact of COVID-19 have deployed an efficient organizational resilience framework. Yet, there is little research on organizational resilience, and the conceptualization of resilience as a complex variable has not been achieved. Focusing on the higher education sector in the UAE during the COVID-19 pandemic, the current study aims to contribute to this promising research area by exploring and expanding a theoretical model on organizational capabilities that constitute organizational resilience. A qualitative phenomenological research design was utilized, where a total of 13 executives from reputable universities were interviewed, followed by a thematic analysis of the data. Findings provided deep insight into the status of universities in the UAE that are currently in the early adaptation stage of the current crisis. Organizational resilience was conceptualized as a process that comprises three successive stages (anticipation, coping, and adaptation), five key antecedents (knowledge, resources availability, social resources, power relationships, and innovative culture), and two main moderators (crisis leadership traits and employee resilience). Important findings were also identified on the needed crisis leadership styles. Recommendations for practice and research are discussed.
有适应力的组织和学术机构被认为对有适应力的社区做出了巨大贡献。大多数表现出应对新冠疫情影响准备的组织都部署了有效的组织适应力框架。然而,关于组织适应力的研究很少,而且尚未实现将适应力概念化为一个复杂变量。本研究聚焦于阿联酋新冠疫情期间的高等教育部门,旨在通过探索和扩展一个关于构成组织适应力的组织能力的理论模型,为这一前景广阔的研究领域做出贡献。采用了定性现象学研究设计,对来自知名大学的13位高管进行了访谈,随后对数据进行了主题分析。研究结果深入洞察了阿联酋目前处于当前危机早期适应阶段的大学的状况。组织适应力被概念化为一个包括三个连续阶段(预期、应对和适应)、五个关键前因(知识、资源可用性、社会资源、权力关系和创新文化)以及两个主要调节因素(危机领导特质和员工适应力)的过程。还确定了关于所需危机领导风格的重要发现。讨论了实践和研究建议。