• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

估算菲律宾的 EQ-5D-5L 值集。

Estimating the EQ-5D-5L value set for the Philippines.

机构信息

Institute of Health Policy and Development Studies, National Institutes of Health, University of the Philippines Manila, Manila, Philippines.

Institute for Public Health and Management, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA.

出版信息

Qual Life Res. 2022 Sep;31(9):2763-2774. doi: 10.1007/s11136-022-03143-w. Epub 2022 May 9.

DOI:10.1007/s11136-022-03143-w
PMID:35532835
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9356948/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The Philippines has recommended the use of Quality-Adjusted Life Years (QALYs) in government health technology assessments (HTA). We aimed to develop a value set for the EQ-5D-5L based on health preferences of the healthy general adult population in the Philippines.

METHODS

Healthy, literate adults were recruited from the Philippine general population with quota targets based on age, sex, administrative region, type of residence, education, income, and ethnolinguistic groups. Each participant's preference was elicited by completing Composite Time Trade-Off (C-TTO) and Discrete Choice Experiment (DCE) tasks. Tasks were computer-assisted using the EuroQol Valuation Technology 2.0. To estimate the value set, we explored 20- and 8-parameter models that either use c-TTO-only data or both c-TTO and DCE (also called hybrid models). Final model choice was guided by principles of monotonicity, out-of-sample likelihood, model fit, and parsimony.

RESULTS

We recruited 1000 respondents with demographic characteristics that approximate the general population such as 49.6% Female, 82% Roman Catholic, 40% in urban areas, and 55% finished high school. None of the 20-parameter models demonstrated monotonicity (logical worsening of coefficients with increasing severity). From the 8-parameter models, the homoscedastic TTO-only model exhibited the best fit. From this model, mobility and pain/ discomfort had the highest effect on utilities.

CONCLUSION

The selected model for representing the Philippine general population preferences for EQ-5D-5L health states was an 8-parameter homoscedastic TTO-only model. This value set is recommended for use in QALY calculations in support of HTA-informed coverage decisions in the Philippines.

摘要

背景

菲律宾建议在政府卫生技术评估(HTA)中使用质量调整生命年(QALYs)。我们旨在根据菲律宾健康普通成年人群的健康偏好,制定基于 EQ-5D-5L 的价值体系。

方法

从菲律宾普通人群中按年龄、性别、行政区域、居住类型、教育、收入和民族语言群体的配额目标招募健康、有文化的成年人。通过完成综合时间权衡(C-TTO)和离散选择实验(DCE)任务来得出每个参与者的偏好。任务使用 EuroQol 估值技术 2.0 进行计算机辅助。为了估计价值体系,我们探索了使用仅 C-TTO 数据或 C-TTO 和 DCE(也称为混合模型)的 20 个和 8 个参数模型。最终模型选择的指导原则是单调性、样本外似然性、模型拟合和简约性。

结果

我们招募了 1000 名具有人口统计学特征的受访者,这些特征与普通人群相似,例如 49.6%为女性、82%为罗马天主教徒、40%居住在城市地区,55%完成了高中学业。没有一个 20 个参数模型表现出单调性(随着严重程度的增加,系数逻辑恶化)。在 8 个参数模型中,同方差 TTO 模型表现出最佳拟合。在这个模型中,移动性和疼痛/不适对效用的影响最大。

结论

代表菲律宾普通人群对 EQ-5D-5L 健康状况偏好的选定模型是一个 8 个参数的同方差 TTO 模型。建议在 QALY 计算中使用该价值体系,以支持菲律宾基于 HTA 的覆盖决策。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a1de/9356948/c2577d624442/11136_2022_3143_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a1de/9356948/c2577d624442/11136_2022_3143_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a1de/9356948/c2577d624442/11136_2022_3143_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Estimating the EQ-5D-5L value set for the Philippines.估算菲律宾的 EQ-5D-5L 值集。
Qual Life Res. 2022 Sep;31(9):2763-2774. doi: 10.1007/s11136-022-03143-w. Epub 2022 May 9.
2
Utility Values for Health States in Ireland: A Value Set for the EQ-5D-5L.爱尔兰健康状态的实用值:EQ-5D-5L 价值体系。
Pharmacoeconomics. 2018 Nov;36(11):1345-1353. doi: 10.1007/s40273-018-0690-x.
3
EQ-5D-5L Valuation for the Malaysian Population.马来西亚人群 EQ-5D-5L 量表值评估。
Pharmacoeconomics. 2019 May;37(5):715-725. doi: 10.1007/s40273-018-0758-7.
4
Comparison of Value Set Based on DCE and/or TTO Data: Scoring for EQ-5D-5L Health States in Japan.基于DCE和/或TTO数据的价值集比较:日本EQ-5D-5L健康状态评分
Value Health. 2016 Jul-Aug;19(5):648-54. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2016.03.1834. Epub 2016 Apr 26.
5
Test-Retest Reliability of EQ-5D-5L Valuation Techniques: The Composite Time Trade-Off and Discrete Choice Experiments.EQ-5D-5L 估值技术的重测信度:综合时间权衡和离散选择实验。
Value Health. 2018 Oct;21(10):1243-1249. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2018.02.003. Epub 2018 Mar 26.
6
Development of an EQ-5D Value Set for India Using an Extended Design (DEVINE) Study: The Indian 5-Level Version EQ-5D Value Set.开发印度 EQ-5D 价值集的扩展设计(DEVINE)研究:印度 5 级版本 EQ-5D 价值集。
Value Health. 2022 Jul;25(7):1218-1226. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2021.11.1370. Epub 2022 Jan 5.
7
Valuation of the EQ-5D-5L in Taiwan.台湾的 EQ-5D-5L 评估。
PLoS One. 2018 Dec 26;13(12):e0209344. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0209344. eCollection 2018.
8
Valuing Health State: An EQ-5D-5L Value Set for Ethiopians.重视健康状况:埃塞俄比亚人的 EQ-5D-5L 值集。
Value Health Reg Issues. 2020 Sep;22:7-14. doi: 10.1016/j.vhri.2019.08.475. Epub 2019 Nov 2.
9
A hybrid modelling approach for eliciting health state preferences: the Portuguese EQ-5D-5L value set.一种用于获取健康状态偏好的混合建模方法:葡萄牙 EQ-5D-5L 值集。
Qual Life Res. 2019 Dec;28(12):3163-3175. doi: 10.1007/s11136-019-02226-5. Epub 2019 Jun 14.
10
The Indonesian EQ-5D-5L Value Set.印度尼西亚 EQ-5D-5L 值集。
Pharmacoeconomics. 2017 Nov;35(11):1153-1165. doi: 10.1007/s40273-017-0538-9.

引用本文的文献

1
The Evolving Landscape of Discrete Choice Experiments in Health Economics: A Systematic Review.健康经济学中离散选择实验的发展态势:一项系统综述
Pharmacoeconomics. 2025 May 21. doi: 10.1007/s40273-025-01495-y.
2
EQ-5D-5L value set for Norway: a hybrid model using cTTO and DCE data.挪威的EQ-5D-5L价值集:一种使用条件价值法和离散选择实验数据的混合模型。
Qual Life Res. 2025 Feb;34(2):417-427. doi: 10.1007/s11136-024-03837-3. Epub 2024 Nov 20.
3
Discrete Choice Experiments in Health State Valuation: A Systematic Review of Progress and New Trends.

本文引用的文献

1
Using QALYs versus DALYs to measure cost-effectiveness: How much does it matter?使用 QALYs 与 DALYs 衡量成本效益:差异有多大?
Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2020 Apr;36(2):96-103. doi: 10.1017/S0266462320000124.
2
Overview, Update, and Lessons Learned From the International EQ-5D-5L Valuation Work: Version 2 of the EQ-5D-5L Valuation Protocol.概述、更新以及从国际 EQ-5D-5L 估值工作中吸取的经验教训:EQ-5D-5L 估值议定书第 2 版。
Value Health. 2019 Jan;22(1):23-30. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2018.05.010. Epub 2019 Jan 2.
3
EQ-5D-5L Valuation for the Malaysian Population.
离散选择实验在健康状态估值中的应用:进展与新趋势的系统综述。
Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2023 May;21(3):405-418. doi: 10.1007/s40258-023-00794-9. Epub 2023 Mar 30.
马来西亚人群 EQ-5D-5L 量表值评估。
Pharmacoeconomics. 2019 May;37(5):715-725. doi: 10.1007/s40273-018-0758-7.
4
The EQ-5D-5L Valuation study in Thailand.泰国的EQ-5D-5L估值研究。
Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res. 2018 Oct;18(5):551-558. doi: 10.1080/14737167.2018.1494574. Epub 2018 Jul 6.
5
Evaluation of Split Version and Feedback Module on the Improvement of Time Trade-Off Data.时间权衡法数据改善的拆分版本和反馈模块评估。
Value Health. 2018 Jun;21(6):732-741. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2017.10.013.
6
Handling Data Quality Issues to Estimate the Spanish EQ-5D-5L Value Set Using a Hybrid Interval Regression Approach.使用混合区间回归方法处理数据质量问题,以估算西班牙 EQ-5D-5L 值集。
Value Health. 2018 May;21(5):596-604. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2017.10.023. Epub 2017 Dec 2.
7
German Value Set for the EQ-5D-5L.德国 EQ-5D-5L 价值集。
Pharmacoeconomics. 2018 Jun;36(6):663-674. doi: 10.1007/s40273-018-0615-8.
8
Assessing the Use of a Feedback Module to Model EQ-5D-5L Health States Values in Hong Kong.评估反馈模块在香港模拟 EQ-5D-5L 健康状态值的应用。
Patient. 2018 Apr;11(2):235-247. doi: 10.1007/s40271-017-0278-0.
9
Logical inconsistencies in time trade-off valuation of EQ-5D-5L health states: Whose fault is it?EQ-5D-5L健康状态时间权衡估值中的逻辑不一致:这是谁的错?
PLoS One. 2017 Sep 21;12(9):e0184883. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0184883. eCollection 2017.
10
Valuing health-related quality of life: An EQ-5D-5L value set for England.重视与健康相关的生活质量:英国的EQ-5D-5L价值集。
Health Econ. 2018 Jan;27(1):7-22. doi: 10.1002/hec.3564. Epub 2017 Aug 22.