• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用用药史分配诊断代码。

Assigning diagnosis codes using medication history.

机构信息

Department of Computer Science, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark.

Department of Computer Science, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark; Department of Information Systems, University of Haifa, Haifa, Israel.

出版信息

Artif Intell Med. 2022 Jun;128:102307. doi: 10.1016/j.artmed.2022.102307. Epub 2022 Apr 20.

DOI:10.1016/j.artmed.2022.102307
PMID:35534145
Abstract

Diagnosis assignment is the process of assigning disease codes to patients. Automatic diagnosis assignment has the potential to validate code assignments, correct erroneous codes, and register completion. Previous methods build on text-based techniques utilizing medical notes but are inapplicable in the absence of these notes. We propose using patients' medication data to assign diagnosis codes. We present a proof-of-concept study using medical data from an American dataset (MIMIC-III) and Danish nationwide registers to train a machine-learning-based model that predicts an extensive collection of diagnosis codes for multiple levels of aggregation over a disease hierarchy. We further suggest a specialized loss function designed to utilize the innate hierarchical nature of the disease hierarchy. We evaluate the proposed method on a subset of 567 disease codes. Moreover, we investigate the technique's generalizability and transferability by (1) training and testing models on the same subsets of disease codes over the two medical datasets and (2) training models on the American dataset while evaluating them on the Danish dataset, respectively. Results demonstrate the proposed method can correctly assign diagnosis codes on multiple levels of aggregation from the disease hierarchy over the American dataset with recall 70.0% and precision 69.48% for top-10 assigned codes; thereby being comparable to text-based techniques. Furthermore, the specialized loss function performs consistently better than the non-hierarchical state-of-the-art version. Moreover, results suggest the proposed method is language and dataset-agnostic, with initial indications of transferability over subsets of disease codes.

摘要

诊断分配是将疾病代码分配给患者的过程。自动诊断分配有可能验证代码分配、纠正错误代码并记录完成情况。以前的方法基于利用医疗记录的基于文本的技术,但在没有这些记录的情况下是不适用的。我们建议使用患者的用药数据来分配诊断代码。我们提出了一项使用来自美国数据集(MIMIC-III)和丹麦全国登记处的医疗数据进行的概念验证研究,以训练一种基于机器学习的模型,该模型可以预测广泛的诊断代码,并在疾病层次结构的多个聚合级别上进行预测。我们进一步提出了一种专门的损失函数,旨在利用疾病层次结构的固有层次性质。我们在 567 个疾病代码的子集中评估了所提出的方法。此外,我们通过(1)在两个医疗数据集中的相同疾病代码子集上训练和测试模型,以及(2)在 美国数据集上训练模型,同时在丹麦数据集上评估模型,分别研究了该技术的泛化能力和可转移性。结果表明,该方法可以在来自美国数据集的疾病层次结构的多个聚合级别上正确分配诊断代码,对于前 10 个分配的代码,召回率为 70.0%,精度为 69.48%;从而与基于文本的技术相当。此外,专门的损失函数始终比非分层的最新版本表现更好。此外,结果表明,该方法是语言和数据集无关的,并且在疾病代码子集上具有初步的可转移性迹象。

相似文献

1
Assigning diagnosis codes using medication history.使用用药史分配诊断代码。
Artif Intell Med. 2022 Jun;128:102307. doi: 10.1016/j.artmed.2022.102307. Epub 2022 Apr 20.
2
An empirical evaluation of supervised learning approaches in assigning diagnosis codes to electronic medical records.对监督学习方法在为电子病历分配诊断代码中的实证评估。
Artif Intell Med. 2015 Oct;65(2):155-66. doi: 10.1016/j.artmed.2015.04.007. Epub 2015 May 15.
3
JLAN: medical code prediction via joint learning attention networks and denoising mechanism.JLAN:基于联合学习注意力网络和去噪机制的医疗编码预测。
BMC Bioinformatics. 2021 Dec 13;22(1):590. doi: 10.1186/s12859-021-04520-x.
4
Diagnosis code assignment: models and evaluation metrics.诊断码分配:模型和评估指标。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2014 Mar-Apr;21(2):231-7. doi: 10.1136/amiajnl-2013-002159. Epub 2013 Dec 2.
5
An empirical evaluation of deep learning for ICD-9 code assignment using MIMIC-III clinical notes.基于 MIMIC-III 临床记录的深度学习方法在 ICD-9 编码任务中的实证评估
Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 2019 Aug;177:141-153. doi: 10.1016/j.cmpb.2019.05.024. Epub 2019 May 25.
6
Artificial Intelligence Learning Semantics via External Resources for Classifying Diagnosis Codes in Discharge Notes.人工智能通过外部资源学习语义以对出院小结中的诊断代码进行分类。
J Med Internet Res. 2017 Nov 6;19(11):e380. doi: 10.2196/jmir.8344.
7
Classification of Current Procedural Terminology Codes from Electronic Health Record Data Using Machine Learning.使用机器学习对电子健康记录数据中的当前操作术语代码进行分类。
Anesthesiology. 2020 Apr;132(4):738-749. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000003150.
8
A two-stream deep model for automated ICD-9 code prediction in an intensive care unit.一种用于重症监护病房自动预测ICD - 9编码的双流深度模型。
Heliyon. 2024 Feb 8;10(4):e25960. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e25960. eCollection 2024 Feb 29.
9
Harmonized representation learning on dynamic EHR graphs.动态电子健康记录图上的协调表示学习。
J Biomed Inform. 2020 Jun;106:103426. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2020.103426. Epub 2020 Apr 25.
10
Medical code prediction via capsule networks and ICD knowledge.基于胶囊网络和 ICD 知识的医疗编码预测。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2021 Jul 30;21(Suppl 2):55. doi: 10.1186/s12911-021-01426-9.

引用本文的文献

1
Rising to the challenge of defining and operationalising multimorbidity in a UK hospital setting: the ADMISSION research collaborative.在英国医院环境中应对定义和操作多病共存的挑战:ADMISSION 研究协作。
Eur Geriatr Med. 2024 Jun;15(3):853-860. doi: 10.1007/s41999-024-00953-8. Epub 2024 Mar 6.
2
How far back do we need to look to capture diagnoses in electronic health records? A retrospective observational study of hospital electronic health record data.我们需要回溯多远的时间才能在电子健康记录中捕捉到诊断信息?一项基于医院电子健康记录数据的回顾性观察研究。
BMJ Open. 2024 Feb 13;14(2):e080678. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-080678.