Suppr超能文献

COVID-19 肺炎患者入住重症监护病房时,BioFire® FilmArray® Pneumonia Panel 与培养的诊断一致性:哥伦比亚 8 家医院第三波疫情的经验。

Diagnostic concordance between BioFire® FilmArray® Pneumonia Panel and culture in patients with COVID-19 pneumonia admitted to intensive care units: the experience of the third wave in eight hospitals in Colombia.

机构信息

Escuela de Ciencias de La Salud, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad Pontificia Bolivariana, Medellín, Colombia.

Intensive Care Unit, Clínica Universitaria Bolivariana, Universidad Pontificia Bolivariana, Medellín, Colombia.

出版信息

Crit Care. 2022 May 9;26(1):130. doi: 10.1186/s13054-022-04006-z.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The detection of coinfections is important to initiate appropriate antimicrobial therapy. Molecular diagnostic testing identifies pathogens at a greater rate than conventional microbiology. We assessed both bacterial coinfections identified via culture or the BioFire® FilmArray® Pneumonia Panel (FA-PNEU) in patients infected with SARS-CoV-2 in the ICU and the concordance between these techniques.

METHODS

This was a prospective study of patients with SARS-CoV-2 who were hospitalized for no more than 48 h and on mechanical ventilation for no longer than 24 h in 8 ICUs in Medellín, Colombia. We studied mini-bronchoalveolar lavage or endotracheal aspirate samples processed via conventional culture and the FA-PNEU. Coinfection was defined as the identification of a respiratory pathogen using the FA-PNEU or cultures. Serum samples of leukocytes, C-reactive protein, and procalcitonin were taken on the first day of intubation. We analyzed the empirical antibiotics and the changes in antibiotic management according to the results of the FA-PNEUM and cultures.

RESULTS

Of 110 patients whose samples underwent both methods, FA-PNEU- and culture-positive samples comprised 24.54% versus 17.27%, respectively. Eighteen samples were positive in both techniques, 82 were negative, 1 was culture-positive with a negative FA-PNEU result, and 9 were FA-PNEU-positive with negative culture. The two bacteria most frequently detected by the FA-PNEU were Staphylococcus aureus (37.5%) and Streptococcus agalactiae (20%), and those detected by culture were Staphylococcus aureus (34.78%) and Klebsiella pneumoniae (26.08%). The overall concordance was 90.1%, and when stratified by microorganism, it was between 92.7 and 100%. The positive predictive value (PPV) was between 50 and 100% and were lower for Enterobacter cloacae and Staphylococcus aureus. The negative predictive value (NPV) was high (between 99.1 and 100%); MecA/C/MREJ had a specificity of 94.55% and an NPV of 100%. The inflammatory response tests showed no significant differences between patients whose samples were positive and negative for both techniques. Sixty-one patients (55.45%) received at least one dose of empirical antibiotics.

CONCLUSIONS

The overall concordance was 90.1%, and it was between 92.7% and 100% when stratified by microorganisms. The positive predictive value was between 50 and 100%, with a very high NPV.

摘要

背景

检测合并感染对于启动适当的抗菌治疗非常重要。分子诊断检测比传统微生物学更能提高病原体的检出率。我们评估了在哥伦比亚麦德林的 8 家 ICU 中感染 SARS-CoV-2 的患者通过培养或生物梅里埃 FilmArray 肺炎检测试剂盒(FA-PNEU)鉴定的细菌合并感染情况,以及这两种技术之间的一致性。

方法

这是一项前瞻性研究,纳入了在哥伦比亚麦德林的 8 家 ICU 中住院时间不超过 48 小时且接受机械通气时间不超过 24 小时的 SARS-CoV-2 感染患者。我们研究了迷你支气管肺泡灌洗或气管内抽吸样本,这些样本通过传统培养和 FA-PNEU 进行处理。合并感染定义为使用 FA-PNEU 或培养鉴定出呼吸道病原体。在插管的第一天采集白细胞、C 反应蛋白和降钙素原的血清样本。我们根据 FA-PNEU 和培养的结果分析了经验性抗生素治疗和抗生素管理的变化。

结果

在接受了这两种方法检测的 110 例患者样本中,FA-PNEU 阳性和培养阳性的样本分别占 24.54%和 17.27%。两种技术均阳性的样本有 18 例,均阴性的样本有 82 例,1 例培养阳性而 FA-PNEU 阴性,9 例 FA-PNEU 阳性而培养阴性。FA-PNEU 最常检测到的两种细菌是金黄色葡萄球菌(37.5%)和无乳链球菌(20%),而培养最常检测到的两种细菌是金黄色葡萄球菌(34.78%)和肺炎克雷伯菌(26.08%)。总体一致性为 90.1%,按微生物分层时为 92.7%至 100%。阳性预测值(PPV)在 50%至 100%之间,肠杆菌科和金黄色葡萄球菌的 PPV 较低。阴性预测值(NPV)较高(99.1%至 100%);MecA/C/MREJ 的特异性为 94.55%,NPV 为 100%。炎症反应检测结果显示,两种技术均阳性和均阴性的患者之间无显著差异。61 例患者(55.45%)至少接受了一剂经验性抗生素治疗。

结论

总体一致性为 90.1%,按微生物分层时为 92.7%至 100%。阳性预测值在 50%至 100%之间,NPV 非常高。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e9c3/9087939/eeba28ecd934/13054_2022_4006_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验