Bay Pierre, Fihman Vincent, Woerther Paul-Louis, Peiffer Bastien, Gendreau Ségolène, Arrestier Romain, Labedade Pascale, Moncomble Elsa, Gaillet Antoine, Carteaux Guillaume, de Prost Nicolas, Mekontso Dessap Armand, Razazi Keyvan
AP-HP (Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris), Hôpitaux Universitaires Henri Mondor, DMU Médecine, Service de Médecine Intensive Réanimation, CHU Henri Mondor, 51, Av. de Lattre de Tassigny, 94010, Créteil CEDEX, France.
Faculté de Santé de Créteil, UPEC (Université Paris Est Créteil), IMRB, GRC CARMAS, 94010, Créteil, France.
Ann Intensive Care. 2024 Jul 29;14(1):118. doi: 10.1186/s13613-024-01348-5.
Antimicrobial stewardship (AMS) for ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) or ventilated hospital-acquired pneumonia (vHAP) in extended-spectrum β-lactamase-producing Enterobacterales (ESBL-E) carriers is challenging. BioFire® FilmArray® Pneumonia plus Panel (mPCR) can detect bacteria and antibiotic resistance genes, including bla, the most common ESBL-encoding gene.
This monocentric, prospective study was conducted on a group of ESBL-E carriers from March 2020 to August 2022. The primary objective was to evaluate the concordance between the results of mPCR and conventional culture performed on respiratory samples of ESBL-E carriers to investigate suspected VAP/vHAP. The secondary objective was to appraise the impact of performing or not mPCR on initial antibiotic therapy adequacy in ESBL-E carriers with confirmed VAP/vHAP.
Over the study period, 294 patients with ESBL-E carriage were admitted to the ICU, of who 168 (57%) were mechanically ventilated. (i) Diagnostic performance of mPCR was evaluated in suspected 41 episodes of VAP/vHAP: bla gene was detected in 15/41 (37%) episodes, where 9/15 (60%) were confirmed ESBL-E-induced pneumonia. The culture and bla were concordant in 35/41 (85%) episodes, and in all episodes where bla was negative (n = 26), the culture never detected ESBL-E. (ii) The impact of mPCR on initial antibiotic therapy adequacy was assessed in 95 episodes of confirmed VAP/vHAP (22 episodes were tested with mPCR and 73 without); 47 (49%) episodes were ESBL-E-induced, and 24 (25%) were carbapenem-resistant bacteria-induced. The use of mPCR was significantly associated with higher prescription of adequate empirical antibiotic therapy in the multivariable logistic regression (adjusted odds ratio (aOR) (95% CI) of 7.5 (2.1-35.9), p = 0.004), propensity-weighting (aOR of 5.9 (1.6-22.1), p = 0.008), and matching-cohort models (aOR of 5.8 (1.5-22.1), p = 0.01).
mPCR bla showed an excellent diagnostic value to rule out the diagnosis of ESBL-E related pneumonia in ESBL-E carriers with suspected VAP/vHAP. In addition, in patients with confirmed VAP/vHAP, a mPCR-based antibiotic therapy was associated with an increased prescription of adequate empirical antibiotic therapy. Performing mPCR on respiratory samples seems to be a promising tool in ESBL-E carriers with suspected vHAP/VAP. However, if mPCR is used in very low pre-test clinical probability of pneumonia, due to the high sensitivity and the rate of overdiagnosed pneumonia, the risk of overconsumption of carbapenem may prevail. Further studies are warranted.
对于产超广谱β-内酰胺酶肠杆菌科细菌(ESBL-E)携带者的呼吸机相关性肺炎(VAP)或通气相关性医院获得性肺炎(vHAP)进行抗菌药物管理具有挑战性。BioFire® FilmArray® 肺炎加检测板(mPCR)可检测细菌及抗生素耐药基因,包括bla,这是最常见的ESBL编码基因。
本单中心前瞻性研究于2020年3月至2022年8月对一组ESBL-E携带者进行。主要目的是评估mPCR结果与对ESBL-E携带者呼吸道样本进行的传统培养结果之间的一致性,以调查疑似VAP/vHAP。次要目的是评估在确诊VAP/vHAP的ESBL-E携带者中进行或不进行mPCR对初始抗生素治疗充分性的影响。
在研究期间,294例携带ESBL-E的患者入住重症监护病房,其中168例(57%)接受机械通气。(i) 在疑似的41例VAP/vHAP病例中评估了mPCR的诊断性能:在15/41(37%)例病例中检测到bla基因,其中9/15(60%)例确诊为ESBL-E所致肺炎。培养结果与bla检测结果在35/41(85%)例病例中一致,并且在所有bla为阴性的病例(n = 26)中,培养均未检测到ESBL-E。(ii) 在95例确诊的VAP/vHAP病例中评估了mPCR对初始抗生素治疗充分性的影响(22例进行了mPCR检测,73例未进行);47例(49%)病例为ESBL-E所致,24例(25%)为耐碳青霉烯类细菌所致。在多变量逻辑回归中,使用mPCR与充分经验性抗生素治疗的更高处方显著相关(调整优势比(aOR)(95%置信区间)为7.5(2.1 - 35.9),p = 0.004),倾向评分加权(aOR为5.9(1.6 - 22.1),p = 0.008),以及匹配队列模型(aOR为5.8(1.5 - 22.1),p = 0.01)。
mPCR bla在排除疑似VAP/vHAP的ESBL-E携带者中ESBL-E相关肺炎的诊断方面显示出优异的诊断价值。此外,在确诊VAP/vHAP的患者中,基于mPCR的抗生素治疗与充分经验性抗生素治疗的处方增加相关。对呼吸道样本进行mPCR似乎是疑似vHAP/VAP的ESBL-E携带者中的一种有前景的工具。然而,如果在肺炎的预测试临床概率非常低的情况下使用mPCR,由于高敏感性和肺炎过度诊断率,碳青霉烯类药物过度使用的风险可能占主导。有必要进行进一步研究。