Suppr超能文献

抗高血压药物对高血压患者血流介导的血管舒张作用的比较疗效:随机对照试验的网状Meta分析

Comparative Efficacy of Antihypertensive Agents in Flow-Mediated Vasodilation of Patients with Hypertension: Network Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trial.

作者信息

Ding Hong, Liu Shu, Zhao Ke-Xin, Pu Jie, Xie Ya-Fei, Zhang Xiao-Wei

机构信息

Department of Cardiology, Lanzhou University Second Hospital, Lanzhou, China.

出版信息

Int J Hypertens. 2022 Apr 30;2022:2432567. doi: 10.1155/2022/2432567. eCollection 2022.

Abstract

Hypertension induces both structural and functional changes in blood vessels, thereby increasing endothelial dysfunction, which in turn, contributes to an increase in blood pressure. A popular and widely used noninvasive tool, flow-mediated dilation (FMD), is used to examine peripheral artery endothelium-dependent dilation. This study aimed to compare the efficacies of different classes of antihypertensive agents based on their effects on FMD. PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library were queried till November 1, 2020. Comparative studies on the efficacies of two or more antihypertensive agents or placebos for hypertensive patients were included. The outcomes were variations in mean systolic and diastolic blood pressure. Two reviewers independently reviewed and filtered the literature and extracted the data; the Cochrane "risk of bias" method was used to evaluate the methodological quality of the randomized controlled trials. A network meta-analysis was performed using Stata 15.0 software with a total of 49 studies. Subgroup analysis based on age and duration of treatments was performed. As compared to the placebo group, patients receiving the antihypertensive drugs exhibited significantly enhanced FMD (ARB + CCB: 4.01%, 95% CI, 0.92-7.11%, < 0.001; ACEI + ARB: 2.81%, 95% CI, 1.19-4.43%, < 0.001; ACEI: 2.55%, 95% CI, 1.34-3.77%, < 0.001; ARB: 2.22%, 95% CI, 1.05-3.38%, < 0.001; -blocker: 2.23%, 95% CI, 0.93-3.52%, < 0.001). In the SUCRA curve for network meta-analysis, the combination of CCB and ARB was found to be the most effective in increasing FMD (SUCRA = 89.0%), followed by ACEI monotherapy (SUCRA = 74.2%). ARB combined with CCB was superior in improving the endothelial function measured as the FMD; ACEI monotherapy was the most effective treatment among the antihypertension medications. There were no significant differences between antihypertensive drug-based monotherapies.

摘要

高血压会导致血管结构和功能发生变化,从而加剧内皮功能障碍,进而促使血压升高。血流介导的血管舒张功能(FMD)是一种常用且广泛应用的非侵入性工具,用于检测外周动脉内皮依赖性舒张功能。本研究旨在根据不同类别降压药物对FMD的影响来比较它们的疗效。检索了截至2020年11月1日的PubMed、Embase和Cochrane图书馆。纳入了关于两种或更多种降压药物或安慰剂对高血压患者疗效的比较研究。结局指标为平均收缩压和舒张压的变化。两名研究者独立对文献进行审查、筛选并提取数据;采用Cochrane“偏倚风险”方法评估随机对照试验的方法学质量。使用Stata 15.0软件进行网络荟萃分析,共纳入49项研究。进行了基于年龄和治疗持续时间的亚组分析。与安慰剂组相比,接受降压药物治疗的患者FMD显著增强(ARB + CCB:4.01%,95%CI,0.92 - 7.11%,<0.001;ACEI + ARB:2.81%,95%CI,1.19 - 4.43%,<0.001;ACEI:2.55%,95%CI,1.34 - 3.77%,<0.001;ARB:2.22%,95%CI,1.05 - 3.38%,<0.001;β受体阻滞剂:2.23%,95%CI,0.93 - 3.52%,<0.001)。在网络荟萃分析的累积排序曲线下面积(SUCRA)曲线中,发现CCB与ARB联合使用在增加FMD方面最有效(SUCRA = 89.0%),其次是ACEI单药治疗(SUCRA = 74.2%)。以FMD衡量,ARB与CCB联合使用在改善内皮功能方面更具优势;ACEI单药治疗是降压药物中最有效的治疗方法。基于降压药物的单药治疗之间无显著差异。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8901/9078796/b8e3f56e937e/IJHY2022-2432567.001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验