Suppr超能文献

牙科治疗中恐惧和焦虑的管理:随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析

Management of fear and anxiety in dental treatments: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

作者信息

Lu Cheng, Zhang Yu Yuan, Xiang Bilu, Peng Si-Min, Gu Min, Wong Hai Ming

机构信息

Paediatric Dentistry and Orthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, 2/F The Prince Philip Dental Hospital, The University of Hong Kong, 34 Hospital Road, Sai Ying Pun, Hong Kong SAR, China.

School of Dentistry, Shenzhen University Health Science Center, Shenzhen, China.

出版信息

Odontology. 2023 Jan;111(1):20-32. doi: 10.1007/s10266-022-00711-x. Epub 2022 May 10.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

This systematic review was to compare the effects of interventions for the management of fear and anxiety for dental treatments.

METHODS

This research project was applied to PubMed, CENTRAL, Web of Science, Cochrane library databases. The last search was run on March 31st, 2021. A list of references of relevant articles and previous reviews were checked. Qualitative and quantitative analyses were performed.

RESULTS

A total of 20 eligible randomized controlled trials were included, and 969 participations in experimental group and 892 participations in the control group were involved. Anxiety levels decreased more in intervention groups than in control groups (Z = 3.47, P = 0.0005, SMD = - 0.62, 95% CI - 0.98 to - 0.27). For adults, there was statistical difference between experimental and control groups [Z = 2.14, P = 0.03, 95% CI - 0.54 (- 1.03, - 0.04)], while there was not no such statistical difference in children and adolescents [Z = 1.62, P = 0.11, 95% CI - 0.60 (- 1.32, 0.13)]. Patients experienced a significant decrease in anxiety level using sedation drugs [Z = 2.44, P = 0.01, 95% CI - 0.61 (- 1.10, - 0.12)] and audio-visual distractions [Z = 3.1, P = 0.002, 95% CI - 0.86 (- 1.40, - 0.32)]. For the informative intervention groups, patients did not show significant difference than control groups [Z = 1.22, P = 0.22, 95% CI - 0.55 (- 1.43, 0. 33)]. There was no statistical difference in vital signs [Z = 1.39, P = 0.16, 95% CI - 0.25 (- 0.61, 0.10)] and pain levels [Z = 0.69, P = 0.49; SMD = - 0.06, 95% CI (0.27, 0.11)] between intervention and control groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Interventions should be used in managing anxiety and fear for dental treatment. It might be effective for anxiety alleviating for adults, but there was a low certainty of evidence that interventions could reduce anxiety level in children and adolescents. Sedation drugs and audio-visual distractions might be useful for managing dental fear and anxiety. Pain levels and vital signs could not be improved form our study. High-quality randomized clinical trials are required for further study.

摘要

目的

本系统评价旨在比较牙科治疗中恐惧和焦虑管理干预措施的效果。

方法

本研究项目应用于PubMed、CENTRAL、科学网、Cochrane图书馆数据库。最后一次检索于2021年3月31日进行。检查了相关文章和既往综述的参考文献列表。进行了定性和定量分析。

结果

共纳入20项符合条件的随机对照试验,实验组969例参与者,对照组892例参与者。干预组焦虑水平的下降幅度大于对照组(Z = 3.47,P = 0.0005,标准化均数差=-0.62,95%置信区间-0.98至-0.27)。对于成年人,实验组和对照组之间存在统计学差异[Z = 2.14,P = 0.03,95%置信区间-0.54(-1.03,-0.04)],而儿童和青少年中不存在这种统计学差异[Z = 1.62,P = 0.11,95%置信区间-0.60(-1.32,0.13)]。使用镇静药物[Z = 2.44,P = 0.01,95%置信区间-0.61(-1.10,-0.12)]和视听分心[Z = 3.1,P = 0.002,95%置信区间-0.86(-1.40,-0.32)]时,患者焦虑水平显著降低。对于信息干预组,患者与对照组相比无显著差异[Z = 1.22,P = 0.22,95%置信区间-0.55(-1.43,0.33)]。干预组和对照组在生命体征[Z = 1.39,P = 0.16,95%置信区间-0.25(-0.61,0.10)]和疼痛水平[Z = 0.69,P = 0.49;标准化均数差=-0.06,95%置信区间(0.27,0.11)]方面无统计学差异。

结论

应采用干预措施来管理牙科治疗中的焦虑和恐惧。这可能对缓解成年人的焦虑有效,但证据的确定性较低,表明干预措施可降低儿童和青少年的焦虑水平。镇静药物和视听分心可能有助于管理牙科恐惧和焦虑。从我们的研究中无法改善疼痛水平和生命体征。需要高质量的随机临床试验进行进一步研究。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验