Division of Epidemiology and Community Health, School of Public Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis.
Cardiovascular Division and Lillehei Heart Institute, University of Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis.
JAMA Netw Open. 2022 May 2;5(5):e2211107. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.11107.
Low-dose aspirin is used for primary prevention of cardiovascular disease in approximately one-third of the US adult population. Overuse and underuse are common and not concordant with guidelines.
To test a community and clinic education intervention to improve guideline-based aspirin use for the primary prevention of cardiovascular disease.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: The Ask About Aspirin project was a nonrandomized controlled trial conducted from, July 1, 2015, to March 31, 2020, using professional education, traditional media, and digital media to improve guideline-based aspirin use. The adult population (aged 45-79 years for men and 55-79 years for women) and primary care clinics in Minnesota were the education targets. The 4 adjacent states were controls.
The statewide campaign distributed billboards, newspaper articles and other print material, and radio announcements. An Ask About Aspirin website was heavily promoted. Primary care clinics identified appropriate aspirin candidates, and clinicians received continuing education about aspirin.
Guideline-based aspirin use by the target population.
Cross-sectional random telephone surveys of 8342 men aged 45 to 79 years and women aged 55 to 79 years were conducted at baseline, 2 years, and 4 years after the intervention. Participation was similar between men and women (baseline: 973 [49%] vs 1001 [51%]; year 4: 912 [50%] vs 930 [50%]). Age during the study also was similar (baseline: 64.7 [IQR, 64.4-65.1] years; year 4: 66.2 [IQR, 65.8-66.5] years). A validated questionnaire evaluated aspirin use. The Ask About Aspirin website had more than 1 million visits; 124 primary care clinics with more than 1000 participating clinicians were part of the education program. Small, nonsignificant increases in discussions with clinicians regarding aspirin resulted (baseline: 341 of 1001 [34%]; year 4: 339 of 930 [36%]; P = .27). Overall aspirin use decreased after the release of new US Preventive Services Task Force guidelines in 2016 and 3 aspirin randomized clinical trials in 2018 suggested reduced aspirin use (baseline: 816 of 1974 [41%]; year 4: 629 of 1842 [34%]; P < .001). Decreases were also noted from year 2 to year 4 in appropriate use (year 2: 597 of 1208 [49%]; year 4: 478 of 1191 [40%]; P < .001) and overuse (year 2: 170 of 602 [28%]; year 4: 151 of 651 [23%]; P = .04). There were no significant differences between Minnesota and the control states.
In this nonrandomized controlled trial, a multiyear statewide campaign was not associated with increased appropriate aspirin use for cardiovascular disease prevention. Contextual factors during the project, including guideline changes and media controversy following the new trials, undermined study goals. These findings suggest that although education programs using social media for cardiovascular disease prevention can result in millions of hits, the use of this strategy to encourage behavior change is problematic, even with supportive clinical sites.
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02607917.
大约三分之一的美国成年人口使用小剂量阿司匹林进行心血管疾病的一级预防。过度使用和使用不足的情况很常见,且不符合指南建议。
测试社区和诊所教育干预措施,以改善基于指南的阿司匹林用于心血管疾病一级预防的使用。
设计、地点和参与者:“询问阿司匹林”项目是一项非随机对照试验,于 2015 年 7 月 1 日至 2020 年 3 月 31 日进行,使用专业教育、传统媒体和数字媒体来提高基于指南的阿司匹林使用。教育目标是明尼苏达州的成年人群体(男性年龄 45-79 岁,女性年龄 55-79 岁)和初级保健诊所。毗邻的 4 个州为对照组。
全州范围的运动分发广告牌、报纸文章和其他印刷材料,以及广播公告。“询问阿司匹林”网站得到了大力推广。初级保健诊所确定了合适的阿司匹林候选者,临床医生接受了关于阿司匹林的继续教育。
目标人群基于指南的阿司匹林使用情况。
在干预后 2 年和 4 年进行了横断面随机电话调查,共调查了 8342 名 45-79 岁的男性和 55-79 岁的女性。男性和女性的参与率相似(基线:973 [49%] vs 1001 [51%];第 4 年:912 [50%] vs 930 [50%])。研究期间的年龄也相似(基线:64.7 [IQR,64.4-65.1] 岁;第 4 年:66.2 [IQR,65.8-66.5] 岁)。使用经过验证的问卷评估了阿司匹林的使用情况。“询问阿司匹林”网站的访问量超过 100 万次;有 124 家拥有 1000 多名参与医生的初级保健诊所参加了该教育项目。与医生讨论阿司匹林的情况略有增加(基线:1001 人中 341 人[34%];第 4 年:930 人中 339 人[36%];P=0.27)。在 2016 年发布新的美国预防服务工作组指南和 2018 年 3 项阿司匹林随机临床试验表明减少阿司匹林使用后,总体阿司匹林使用率下降(基线:1974 人中 816 人[41%];第 4 年:1842 人中 629 人[34%];P<0.001)。从第 2 年到第 4 年,适当使用(第 2 年:1208 人中 597 人[49%];第 4 年:1191 人中 478 人[40%];P<0.001)和过度使用(第 2 年:602 人中 170 人[28%];第 4 年:651 人中 151 人[23%];P=0.04)也有所下降。明尼苏达州和对照组之间没有显著差异。
在这项非随机对照试验中,多年的全州范围运动并未增加心血管疾病预防中适当使用阿司匹林的情况。项目期间的背景因素,包括新试验后的指南变化和媒体争议,破坏了研究目标。这些发现表明,尽管使用社交媒体进行心血管疾病预防的教育计划可以产生数百万的点击量,但即使有支持性的临床网站,使用这种策略来鼓励行为改变也存在问题。
ClinicalTrials.gov 标识符:NCT02607917。