• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

消毒方案去除蔬菜中寄生虫的效果:系统评价和荟萃分析方案。

Efficacy of sanitization protocols in removing parasites in vegetables: A protocol for a systematic review with meta-analysis.

机构信息

Nutrition Postgraduate Program, Center for Health Sciences, Federal University of Rio Grande do Norte, Natal, Brazil.

Myant INC, Research and Development, Toronto, Canada.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2022 May 10;17(5):e0268258. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0268258. eCollection 2022.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0268258
PMID:35536855
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9089895/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Parasitic contamination of vegetables is a public health problem in several countries and a challenge for food safety. With a short path from the field to the table, these foods can suffer several flaws in the good practices of production, transport and packaging which culminate in an offer of contaminated food to consumers. Therefore, this study describes a systematic review protocol with meta-analysis on evaluating the effectiveness of existing sanitation methods in removing parasites from vegetables.

METHODS

The study will be conducted from published studies that report analyzes of parasites in vegetables before and after sanitization processes. The MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, FSTA, LILACS, Scopus and AGRIS electronic databases will be used. In addition, manual searches will be carried out through related articles, references to included articles and directories of theses and dissertations. The primary outcome will be the reduction or absence of parasitic forms in vegetables after the intervention or combined interventions, and the secondary outcomes will include: identification of the main parasites, assessment of the time required for processing and cost-effectiveness analysis. Two authors will independently screen the studies and extract data. Disagreements will be resolved by discussion, and a third reviewer will decide if there is no consensus. The criteria established by the Cochrane Manual (with some adaptations) will be used to assess the risk of bias in the studies and if the results are considered acceptable and sufficiently homogeneous, and a meta-analysis will be performed to synthesize the findings.

DISCUSSION

The systematic review produced from this protocol will provide evidence on the effectiveness of sanitation protocols for removing parasitic forms in vegetables and will contribute to strengthening food safety, with the adoption of best sanitation practices and prevention of health risks. In addition, the study may highlight possible knowledge gaps that need to be filled with new research.

SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION

PROSPERO registration number: CRD42020206929.

摘要

背景

蔬菜的寄生虫污染是一些国家的公共卫生问题,也是食品安全的一大挑战。由于这些食物从田间到餐桌的路径很短,因此在生产、运输和包装过程中,如果良好操作规范存在缺陷,最终会为消费者提供受污染的食物。因此,本研究描述了一项系统评价方案,通过 meta 分析评估现有的蔬菜清洁方法去除寄生虫的效果。

方法

本研究将从报告蔬菜在清洁前后寄生虫分析的已发表研究中进行。将使用 MEDLINE、Embase、Web of Science、FSTA、LILACS、Scopus 和 AGRIS 电子数据库。此外,还将通过相关文章、纳入文章的参考文献以及论文和学位论文目录进行手动搜索。主要结局指标是干预或联合干预后蔬菜中寄生虫数量的减少或消失,次要结局指标将包括:主要寄生虫的鉴定、处理所需时间的评估和成本效益分析。两位作者将独立筛选研究并提取数据。如果存在分歧,将通过讨论解决,如果没有达成共识,则由第三位审稿人决定。将使用 Cochrane 手册(有一些调整)制定的标准评估研究的偏倚风险,如果结果被认为是可接受的且足够同质,则将进行 meta 分析以综合研究结果。

讨论

本方案产生的系统评价将为去除蔬菜中寄生虫形态的清洁方案的有效性提供证据,并通过采用最佳清洁实践和预防健康风险,为加强食品安全做出贡献。此外,该研究可能会突出需要新研究来填补的可能的知识空白。

系统评价注册

PROSPERO 注册号:CRD42020206929。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cf96/9089895/b0226002339b/pone.0268258.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cf96/9089895/b0226002339b/pone.0268258.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cf96/9089895/b0226002339b/pone.0268258.g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Efficacy of sanitization protocols in removing parasites in vegetables: A protocol for a systematic review with meta-analysis.消毒方案去除蔬菜中寄生虫的效果:系统评价和荟萃分析方案。
PLoS One. 2022 May 10;17(5):e0268258. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0268258. eCollection 2022.
2
Effectiveness of sanitization protocols in removing or reducing parasites from vegetables: A systematic review with meta-analysis.消毒方案去除或减少蔬菜中寄生虫的有效性:系统评价与荟萃分析。
PLoS One. 2023 Sep 1;18(9):e0290447. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0290447. eCollection 2023.
3
Prevalence of staphylococcal toxin in food contaminated by Staphylococcus spp.: Protocol for a systematic review with meta-analysis.食品中污染葡萄球菌的葡萄球菌毒素流行率:系统评价与荟萃分析方案。
PLoS One. 2023 Feb 21;18(2):e0282111. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0282111. eCollection 2023.
4
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
5
Beyond the black stump: rapid reviews of health research issues affecting regional, rural and remote Australia.超越黑木树:影响澳大利亚地区、农村和偏远地区的健康研究问题的快速综述。
Med J Aust. 2020 Dec;213 Suppl 11:S3-S32.e1. doi: 10.5694/mja2.50881.
6
Effectiveness of autogenic training on psychological well-being and quality of life in adults living with chronic physical health problems: a protocol for a systematic review of RCT.基于随机对照试验的系统评价:自生训练对患有慢性身体健康问题的成年人的心理健康和生活质量的有效性:方案。
Syst Rev. 2020 Apr 7;9(1):74. doi: 10.1186/s13643-020-01336-3.
7
Thiazide diuretics alone or in combination with a potassium-sparing diuretic on blood pressure-lowering in patients with primary hypertension: protocol for a systematic review and network meta-analysis.噻嗪类利尿剂单独或与保钾利尿剂联合用于原发性高血压患者的降压治疗:系统评价和网络荟萃分析方案。
Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 8;11(1):23. doi: 10.1186/s13643-022-01890-y.
8
The prevalence, risk factors and outcomes of anaemia in South African pregnant women: a protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis.南非孕妇贫血的患病率、危险因素及结局:一项系统评价与荟萃分析方案
Syst Rev. 2020 Sep 11;9(1):209. doi: 10.1186/s13643-020-01460-0.
9
Evaluating characteristics of PROSPERO records as predictors of eventual publication of non-Cochrane systematic reviews: a meta-epidemiological study protocol.评价 PROSPERO 记录特征对非 Cochrane 系统评价最终发表的预测作用:一项meta 流行病学研究方案。
Syst Rev. 2018 Mar 9;7(1):43. doi: 10.1186/s13643-018-0709-6.
10
Management strategies for patients with subclinical hypothyroidism: a protocol for an umbrella review.亚临床甲状腺功能减退症患者的管理策略:伞式评价方案。
Syst Rev. 2021 Nov 1;10(1):290. doi: 10.1186/s13643-021-01842-y.

引用本文的文献

1
Effectiveness of sanitization protocols in removing or reducing parasites from vegetables: A systematic review with meta-analysis.消毒方案去除或减少蔬菜中寄生虫的有效性:系统评价与荟萃分析。
PLoS One. 2023 Sep 1;18(9):e0290447. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0290447. eCollection 2023.
2
Investigating the Occurrence of Soil-Transmitted Parasites Contaminating Soil, Vegetables, and Green Fodder in the East of Nile Delta, Egypt.调查埃及尼罗河三角洲东部土壤、蔬菜和绿色饲料中土壤传播寄生虫的污染情况。
J Parasitol Res. 2023 Jun 6;2023:6300563. doi: 10.1155/2023/6300563. eCollection 2023.

本文引用的文献

1
Parasitic contamination of fresh vegetables sold in open markets: a public health threat.农贸市场销售的新鲜蔬菜中的寄生虫污染:公共健康威胁。
Braz J Biol. 2021 Nov 22;82:e242614. doi: 10.1590/1519-6984.242614. eCollection 2021.
2
Microbial Quality Assessment and Efficacy of Low-Cost Disinfectants on Fresh Fruits and Vegetables Collected from Urban Areas of Dhaka, Bangladesh.孟加拉国达卡市区采集的新鲜水果和蔬菜上低成本消毒剂的微生物质量评估及效果
Foods. 2021 Jun 9;10(6):1325. doi: 10.3390/foods10061325.
3
Effect of Chlorine Dioxide Treatment on Human Pathogens on Iceberg Lettuce.
二氧化氯处理对生菜上人类病原体的影响。
Foods. 2021 Mar 10;10(3):574. doi: 10.3390/foods10030574.
4
Zoonotic parasitic organisms on vegetables: Impact of production system characteristics on presence, prevalence on vegetables in northwestern Iran and washing methods for removal.蔬菜上的人畜共患寄生虫:生产系统特征对伊朗西北部蔬菜上寄生虫的存在、流行情况的影响以及去除寄生虫的清洗方法
Food Microbiol. 2021 May;95:103704. doi: 10.1016/j.fm.2020.103704. Epub 2020 Dec 2.
5
Why we need a European focus on foodborne parasites.为什么我们需要关注食源性寄生虫?
Exp Parasitol. 2020 Jul;214:107900. doi: 10.1016/j.exppara.2020.107900. Epub 2020 Apr 23.
6
Parasite contamination of berries: Risk, occurrence, and approaches for mitigation.浆果的寄生虫污染:风险、发生情况及缓解措施
Food Waterborne Parasitol. 2018 Apr 21;10:23-38. doi: 10.1016/j.fawpar.2018.04.002. eCollection 2018 Mar.
7
Food Safety Challenges and Barriers in Southern United States Farmers Markets.美国南部农民市场的食品安全挑战与障碍
Foods. 2019 Dec 21;9(1):12. doi: 10.3390/foods9010012.
8
[Tutorial for performing systematic review and meta-analysis with interventional anesthesia studies].[介入麻醉研究的系统评价与Meta分析实施教程]
Braz J Anesthesiol. 2019 May-Jun;69(3):299-306. doi: 10.1016/j.bjan.2018.11.007. Epub 2019 Feb 2.
9
Review: Comparison of the effectiveness of decontaminating strategies for fresh fruits and vegetables and related limitations.综述:新鲜果蔬消毒策略的效果比较及相关局限性。
Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr. 2018;58(18):3189-3208. doi: 10.1080/10408398.2017.1354813. Epub 2017 Sep 26.
10
Occurrence of Intestinal Parasitic Contamination in Select Consumed Local Raw Vegetables and Fruits in Kuantan, Pahang.彭亨关丹市部分食用的当地生鲜蔬菜和水果中肠道寄生虫污染情况
Trop Life Sci Res. 2017 Jan;28(1):23-32. doi: 10.21315/tlsr2017.28.1.2.