Diabetes & Endocrine Centre, Birmingham Heartlands Hospital, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK.
School of Nursing, Institute of Clinical Sciences.
Eur J Endocrinol. 2022 Jun 1;187(1):S1-S20. doi: 10.1530/EJE-21-1248.
The incidence of adrenal crisis (AC) remains high, particularly for people with primary adrenal insufficiency, despite the introduction of behavioural interventions. The present study aimed to identify and evaluate available evidence of interventions aiming to prevent AC in primary adrenal insufficiency.
This study is a systematic review of the literature and theoretical mapping.
MEDLINE, MEDLINE in Process, EMBASE, ERIC, Cochrane CENTRAL, CINAHL, PsycINFO, the Health Management Information Consortium and trial registries were searched from inception to November 2021. Three reviewers independently selected studies and extracted data. Two reviewers appraised the studies for the risk of bias.
Seven observational or mixed methods studies were identified where interventions were designed to prevent AC in adrenal insufficiency. Patient education was the focus of all interventions and utilised the same two behaviour change techniques, 'instruction on how to perform a behaviour' and 'pharmacological support'. Barrier and facilitator themes aiding or hindering the intervention included knowledge, behaviour, emotions, skills, social influences and environmental context and resources. Most studies did not measure effectiveness, and assessment of knowledge varied across studies. The study quality was moderate.
This is an emerging field with limited studies available. Further research is required in relation to the development and assessment of different behaviour change interventions to prevent AC.
尽管已经引入了行为干预措施,但肾上腺危象(AC)的发病率仍然很高,尤其是在原发性肾上腺功能不全的人群中。本研究旨在确定和评估旨在预防原发性肾上腺功能不全中 AC 的干预措施的现有证据。
这是一项文献的系统评价和理论映射研究。
从开始到 2021 年 11 月,检索了 MEDLINE、正在处理的 MEDLINE、EMBASE、ERIC、Cochrane 中心、CINAHL、PsycINFO、健康管理信息联合会和试验登记处。三名审查员独立选择研究并提取数据。两名审查员评估了研究的偏倚风险。
确定了 7 项观察性或混合方法研究,这些研究旨在预防肾上腺功能不全中的 AC。所有干预措施的重点都是患者教育,并使用了两种相同的行为改变技术,“关于如何执行行为的指导”和“药物支持”。有助于或阻碍干预的障碍和促进因素主题包括知识、行为、情绪、技能、社会影响以及环境背景和资源。大多数研究没有测量效果,并且研究之间的知识评估也有所不同。研究质量为中等。
这是一个新兴领域,可用的研究有限。需要进一步研究不同的行为改变干预措施的开发和评估,以预防 AC。