• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

比较交互变量的联合二分法和单一二分法,以区分疾病结局。

A comparison of joint dichotomization and single dichotomization of interacting variables to discriminate a disease outcome.

机构信息

Department of Mathematics, Washington and Lee University, 204 W Washington St, Lexington, VA 24450, USA.

Department of Public Health Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina.

出版信息

Int J Biostat. 2022 May 10;18(2):613-625. doi: 10.1515/ijb-2021-0071. eCollection 2022 Nov 1.

DOI:10.1515/ijb-2021-0071
PMID:35536987
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10198136/
Abstract

Dichotomization is often used on clinical and diagnostic settings to simplify interpretation. For example, a person with systolic and diastolic blood pressure above 140 over 90 may be prescribed medication. Blood pressure as well as other factors such as age and cholesterol and their interactions may lead to increased risk of certain diseases. When using a dichotomized variable to determine a diagnosis, if the interactions with other variables are not considered, then an incorrect threshold for the continuous variable may be selected. In this paper, we compare single dichotomization with joint dichotomization; the process of simultaneously optimizing cutpoints for multiple variables. A simulation study shows that simultaneous dichotomization of continuous variables is more accurate in recovering both 'true' thresholds given they exist.

摘要

二分法常用于临床和诊断环境中,以简化解释。例如,收缩压和舒张压均高于 140/90 的人可能需要服用药物。血压以及其他因素(如年龄、胆固醇及其相互作用)可能会增加某些疾病的风险。当使用二分变量来确定诊断时,如果不考虑与其他变量的相互作用,则可能会选择错误的连续变量阈值。在本文中,我们将比较单一二分法和联合二分法;这是同时优化多个变量切点的过程。模拟研究表明,同时对连续变量进行二分法更能准确地恢复给定的“真实”阈值。

相似文献

1
A comparison of joint dichotomization and single dichotomization of interacting variables to discriminate a disease outcome.比较交互变量的联合二分法和单一二分法,以区分疾病结局。
Int J Biostat. 2022 May 10;18(2):613-625. doi: 10.1515/ijb-2021-0071. eCollection 2022 Nov 1.
2
An evaluation of common methods for dichotomization of continuous variables to discriminate disease status.对连续变量进行二分以区分疾病状态的常用方法的评估。
Commun Stat Theory Methods. 2017;46(21):10823-10834. doi: 10.1080/03610926.2016.1248783. Epub 2017 Aug 2.
3
Inference for causal interactions for continuous exposures under dichotomization.二分法下连续暴露的因果相互作用推断。
Biometrics. 2011 Dec;67(4):1414-21. doi: 10.1111/j.1541-0420.2011.01629.x. Epub 2011 Jun 20.
4
[Dichotomization of continuous variables in logistic regression models].[逻辑回归模型中连续变量的二分法]
Rev Med Chil. 1996 Jul;124(7):836-42.
5
A note on dichotomization of continuous response variable in the presence of contamination and model misspecification.关于混杂存在且模型设定有误时连续反应变量二分法的说明。
Stat Med. 2010 Sep 20;29(21):2200-14. doi: 10.1002/sim.3966.
6
Evaluate Cutpoints: Adaptable continuous data distribution system for determining survival in Kaplan-Meier estimator.评估切点:适用于 Kaplan-Meier 估计器的可适应连续数据分布系统,用于确定生存情况。
Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 2019 Aug;177:133-139. doi: 10.1016/j.cmpb.2019.05.023. Epub 2019 May 23.
7
Comparative Evaluation of Median Versus Youden Index Dichotomization Methods: Exposure-Response Analysis of Mycophenolic Acid and Acyl-Glucuronide Metabolite.中位数与尤登指数二分法的比较评估:霉酚酸和酰基葡萄糖醛酸代谢物的暴露-反应分析
Eur J Drug Metab Pharmacokinet. 2019 Oct;44(5):629-638. doi: 10.1007/s13318-019-00550-2.
8
Dichotomization of continuous measurements using generalized additive modelling--application in predicting intrapartum caesarean delivery.使用广义相加模型对连续测量值进行二分法——在预测产时剖宫产中的应用
Stat Med. 1999 May 15;18(9):1101-10. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0258(19990515)18:9<1101::aid-sim99>3.0.co;2-q.
9
A conceptual and empirical examination of justifications for dichotomization.对二分法的合理性进行概念和实证检验。
Psychol Methods. 2009 Dec;14(4):349-66. doi: 10.1037/a0016956.
10
Regression calibration for dichotomized mismeasured predictors.二分法测量错误预测变量的回归校准
Int J Biostat. 2009;5(1):Article 12. doi: 10.2202/1557-4679.1143.

本文引用的文献

1
SCORE2 risk prediction algorithms: new models to estimate 10-year risk of cardiovascular disease in Europe.SCORE2 风险预测算法:用于评估欧洲人群 10 年心血管疾病风险的新模型。
Eur Heart J. 2021 Jul 1;42(25):2439-2454. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehab309.
2
An evaluation of common methods for dichotomization of continuous variables to discriminate disease status.对连续变量进行二分以区分疾病状态的常用方法的评估。
Commun Stat Theory Methods. 2017;46(21):10823-10834. doi: 10.1080/03610926.2016.1248783. Epub 2017 Aug 2.
3
Analysis by categorizing or dichotomizing continuous variables is inadvisable: an example from the natural history of unruptured aneurysms.
将连续变量分类或二分法分析是不可取的:未破裂动脉瘤自然史的一个例子。
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2011 Mar;32(3):437-40. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A2425. Epub 2011 Feb 17.
4
A limitation of the diagnostic-odds ratio in determining an optimal cut-off value for a continuous diagnostic test.诊断优势比在确定连续诊断试验最佳截断值方面的局限性。
Stat Methods Med Res. 2011 Oct;20(5):541-50. doi: 10.1177/0962280210374532. Epub 2010 Jul 16.
5
Dichotomization of continuous data--a pitfall in prognostic factor studies.连续数据的二分法——预后因素研究中的一个陷阱。
Pathol Res Pract. 2008;204(3):213-4. doi: 10.1016/j.prp.2007.12.002. Epub 2008 Jan 22.
6
Genes, environment, health, and disease: facing up to complexity.基因、环境、健康与疾病:直面复杂性。
Hum Hered. 2007;63(2):63-6. doi: 10.1159/000099178. Epub 2007 Feb 2.
7
Machine learning for detecting gene-gene interactions: a review.用于检测基因-基因相互作用的机器学习:综述
Appl Bioinformatics. 2006;5(2):77-88. doi: 10.2165/00822942-200605020-00002.
8
The cost of dichotomising continuous variables.将连续变量二分的代价。
BMJ. 2006 May 6;332(7549):1080. doi: 10.1136/bmj.332.7549.1080.
9
Index for rating diagnostic tests.诊断试验评级指数。
Cancer. 1950 Jan;3(1):32-5. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(1950)3:1<32::aid-cncr2820030106>3.0.co;2-3.
10
Candidate-gene approaches for studying complex genetic traits: practical considerations.用于研究复杂遗传性状的候选基因方法:实际考量
Nat Rev Genet. 2002 May;3(5):391-7. doi: 10.1038/nrg796.