Population Health Laboratory (#PopHealthLab), University of Fribourg, Fribourg, Switzerland.
Institute of Primary Health Care (BIHAM), University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
BMJ Open. 2022 May 10;12(5):e059399. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-059399.
Hypertension management remains a major public health challenge in primary care. Innovative interventions to improve blood pressure (BP) control are needed. One approach is through community-based models of care with the involvement of pharmacists and other non-physician healthcare professionals. Our objective is to systematically review the evidence of the impact of pharmacist care alone or in collaboration with other healthcare professionals on BP among hypertensive outpatients compared with usual care. Because these interventions can be complex, with various components, the effect size may differ between the type of interventions. One major focus of our study will be to assess carefully the heterogeneity in the effects of these interventions to identify which ones work best in a given healthcare setting.
Systematic searches of the Medical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System Online (MEDLINE), Excerpta Medica (Embase) and Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) databases will be conducted. Randomised controlled trials assessing the effect of pharmacist interventions on BP among outpatients will be included. Examples for pharmacist interventions are patient education, feedback to physician and medication management. The outcome will be the change in BP or BP at follow-up or BP control. Results will be synthesised descriptively and, if appropriate, will be pooled across studies to perform meta-analyses. If feasible, we will also perform a network meta-analysis to compare interventions that have not been compared directly head-to-head by using indirect evidence. Heterogeneity in the effect will be evaluated through prespecified subgroup and stratified analyses, accounting notably for the type and intensity of interventions, patients' characteristics and healthcare setting.
Ethical approval is not required as the results will be drawn from currently available published literature. Outcomes of the review will be shared through peer-reviewed journal and used for implementation policy.
CRD42021279751.
高血压管理仍然是基层医疗的主要公共卫生挑战。需要创新的干预措施来改善血压(BP)控制。一种方法是通过社区为基础的护理模式,让药剂师和其他非医师医疗保健专业人员参与其中。我们的目标是系统地回顾仅由药剂师护理或与其他医疗保健专业人员合作对高血压门诊患者的 BP 产生影响的证据,与常规护理相比。由于这些干预措施可能很复杂,具有各种组成部分,因此干预类型之间的效果大小可能会有所不同。我们研究的一个主要重点将是仔细评估这些干预措施效果的异质性,以确定在特定医疗保健环境中哪种干预措施效果最好。
将对在线医学文献分析和检索系统(MEDLINE)、Excerpta Medica(Embase)和中央对照试验注册中心(CENTRAL)数据库进行系统搜索。将包括评估药剂师干预对门诊患者 BP 影响的随机对照试验。药剂师干预的例子是患者教育、向医生反馈和药物管理。结果将是 BP 或随访时的 BP 变化或 BP 控制。结果将进行描述性综合,如果合适,将在研究之间进行汇总,以进行荟萃分析。如果可行,我们还将进行网络荟萃分析,使用间接证据比较未直接对头对头比较的干预措施。通过预设的亚组和分层分析评估效果的异质性,特别是要考虑干预措施的类型和强度、患者的特征和医疗保健环境。
不需要伦理批准,因为结果将来自现有已发表的文献。将通过同行评审的期刊共享审查结果,并将其用于实施政策。
CRD42021279751。