• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

开发和验证 2 型糖尿病患者择期手术围手术期低血糖风险预测模型。

Development and validation of a prediction model of perioperative hypoglycemia risk in patients with type 2 diabetes undergoing elective surgery.

机构信息

Teaching and Research Section of Clinical Nursing, Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, People's Republic of China.

National Clinical Research Center for Geriatric Disorders, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, People's Republic of China.

出版信息

BMC Surg. 2022 May 10;22(1):167. doi: 10.1186/s12893-022-01601-3.

DOI:10.1186/s12893-022-01601-3
PMID:35538461
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9092794/
Abstract

AIM

To develop and validate a prediction model to evaluate the perioperative hypoglycemia risk in hospitalized type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) patients undergoing elective surgery.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed the electronic medical records of 1410 T2DM patients who had been hospitalized and undergone elective surgery. Regression analysis was used to develop a predictive model for perioperative hypoglycemia risk. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve and the Hosmer-Lemeshow test were used to verify the model.

RESULTS

Our study showed an incidence of 10.7% for level 1 hypoglycemia and 1.8% for level 2 severe hypoglycemia during the perioperative period. A perioperative hypoglycemic risk prediction model was developed that was mainly composed of four predictors: duration of diabetes ≥ 10 year, body mass index (BMI) < 18.5 kg/m, standard deviation of blood glucose (SDBG) ≥ 3.0 mmol/L, and preoperative hypoglycemic regimen of insulin subcutaneous. Based on this model, patients were categorized into three groups: low, medium, and high risk. Internal validation of the prediction model showed high discrimination (ROC statistic = 0.715) and good calibration (no significant differences between predicted and observed risk: Pearson χ goodness-of-fit P = 0.765).

CONCLUSIONS

The perioperative hypoglycemic risk prediction model categorizes the risk of hypoglycemia using only four predictors and shows good reliability and validity. The model serves as a favorable tool for clinicians to predict hypoglycemic risk and guide future interventions to reduce hypoglycemia risk.

摘要

目的

开发和验证一种预测模型,以评估接受择期手术的住院 2 型糖尿病(T2DM)患者围手术期发生低血糖的风险。

方法

我们回顾性分析了 1410 例接受择期手术的 T2DM 住院患者的电子病历。采用回归分析建立围手术期低血糖风险预测模型。使用受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线和 Hosmer-Lemeshow 检验对模型进行验证。

结果

我们的研究显示,围手术期 1 级低血糖的发生率为 10.7%,2 级严重低血糖的发生率为 1.8%。建立了一种围手术期低血糖风险预测模型,主要由四个预测因素组成:糖尿病病程≥10 年、体重指数(BMI)<18.5kg/m²、血糖标准差(SDBG)≥3.0mmol/L、术前胰岛素皮下降糖方案。根据该模型,患者被分为低、中、高风险三组。预测模型的内部验证显示出较高的区分度(ROC 统计量=0.715)和良好的校准度(预测风险与观察风险之间无显著差异:Pearson χ 拟合优度 P=0.765)。

结论

该围手术期低血糖风险预测模型仅使用四个预测因素对低血糖风险进行分类,具有较好的可靠性和有效性。该模型可作为临床医生预测低血糖风险和指导未来干预措施以降低低血糖风险的有利工具。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e9ff/9092794/1237f4201ef3/12893_2022_1601_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e9ff/9092794/1237f4201ef3/12893_2022_1601_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e9ff/9092794/1237f4201ef3/12893_2022_1601_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Development and validation of a prediction model of perioperative hypoglycemia risk in patients with type 2 diabetes undergoing elective surgery.开发和验证 2 型糖尿病患者择期手术围手术期低血糖风险预测模型。
BMC Surg. 2022 May 10;22(1):167. doi: 10.1186/s12893-022-01601-3.
2
Development and Validation of a Tool to Identify Patients With Type 2 Diabetes at High Risk of Hypoglycemia-Related Emergency Department or Hospital Use.一种用于识别有低血糖相关急诊科就诊或住院高风险的2型糖尿病患者的工具的开发与验证
JAMA Intern Med. 2017 Oct 1;177(10):1461-1470. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2017.3844.
3
Derivation and Validation of a Risk-Prediction Tool for Hypoglycemia in Hospitalized Adults With Diabetes: The Hypoglycemia During Hospitalization (HyDHo) Score.住院糖尿病成人低血糖风险预测工具的推导和验证:住院期间低血糖(HyDHo)评分。
Can J Diabetes. 2019 Jun;43(4):278-282.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jcjd.2018.08.061. Epub 2018 Aug 10.
4
Prediction of Hypoglycemia in Diabetic Patients During Colonoscopy Preparation.预测结肠镜检查准备期间糖尿病患者的低血糖症。
Exp Clin Endocrinol Diabetes. 2023 May;131(5):274-281. doi: 10.1055/a-2044-0685. Epub 2023 Apr 26.
5
Development and validation of an automated algorithm for identifying patients at high risk for drug-induced hypoglycemia.一种用于识别药物性低血糖高危患者的自动化算法的开发与验证
Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2018 Nov 1;75(21):1714-1728. doi: 10.2146/ajhp180071. Epub 2018 Oct 2.
6
Indonesia Cohort of IO HAT Study to Evaluate Diabetes Management, Control, and Complications in Retrospective and Prospective Periods Among Insulin-Treated Patients with Type 1 and Type 2 Diabetes.印度尼西亚胰岛素治疗的1型和2型糖尿病患者回顾性和前瞻性阶段糖尿病管理、控制及并发症评估的IO HAT研究队列
Acta Med Indones. 2018 Jan;50(1):26-37.
7
Development and validation of a prediction model for self-reported hypoglycemia risk in patients with type 2 diabetes: A longitudinal cohort study.开发和验证 2 型糖尿病患者自我报告低血糖风险的预测模型:一项纵向队列研究。
J Diabetes Investig. 2024 Apr;15(4):468-482. doi: 10.1111/jdi.14135. Epub 2024 Jan 19.
8
Relation Between Hypoglycemia and Glycemic Variability in Type 2 Diabetes Patients with Insulin Therapy: A Study Based on Continuous Glucose Monitoring.基于连续血糖监测的胰岛素治疗 2 型糖尿病患者低血糖与血糖变异性的关系研究
Diabetes Technol Ther. 2018 Feb;20(2):140-146. doi: 10.1089/dia.2017.0306. Epub 2018 Jan 2.
9
Predicting hypoglycemia after treatment of hyperkalemia with insulin and glucose (Glu-K60 score).预测胰岛素和葡萄糖治疗高钾血症后低血糖(Glu-K60 评分)。
BMC Emerg Med. 2022 Nov 12;22(1):179. doi: 10.1186/s12873-022-00748-9.
10
Analysis of risk factors for hypoglycemia in patients with gastrointestinal bleeding induced by somatostatin for injection and establishment of the prediction model.注射用生长抑素致胃肠道出血患者发生低血糖的危险因素分析及预测模型的建立。
Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2024 Jan;62(1):29-36. doi: 10.5414/CP204487.

引用本文的文献

1
Machine Learning to Diagnose Complications of Diabetes.用于诊断糖尿病并发症的机器学习
J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2025 Sep 11:19322968251365245. doi: 10.1177/19322968251365245.
2
Predicting hypoglycemia risk after gastrointestinal surgery in type 2 diabetes mellitus: a retrospective cohort study.预测2型糖尿病患者胃肠手术后的低血糖风险:一项回顾性队列研究。
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2025 Jul 7;16:1590780. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2025.1590780. eCollection 2025.
3
Artificial Intelligence to Diagnose Complications of Diabetes.人工智能用于诊断糖尿病并发症。

本文引用的文献

1
The obesity paradox and hypoglycemia in critically ill patients.危重症患者的肥胖悖论与低血糖
Crit Care. 2021 Nov 1;25(1):378. doi: 10.1186/s13054-021-03795-z.
2
Chinese clinical practice guidelines for perioperative blood glucose management.《中国围手术期血糖管理临床实践指南》
Diabetes Metab Res Rev. 2021 Oct;37(7):e3439. doi: 10.1002/dmrr.3439. Epub 2021 Feb 19.
3
Development and Validation of a Machine Learning Model to Predict Near-Term Risk of Iatrogenic Hypoglycemia in Hospitalized Patients.开发和验证一种机器学习模型,以预测住院患者近期发生医源性低血糖的风险。
J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2025 Jan;19(1):246-264. doi: 10.1177/19322968241287773. Epub 2024 Nov 22.
4
Continuous peri-operative glucose monitoring in noncardiac surgery: A systematic review.非心脏手术围手术期连续血糖监测:一项系统评价
Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2025 Feb 1;42(2):162-171. doi: 10.1097/EJA.0000000000002095. Epub 2024 Nov 7.
5
Anti-Hyperglycemic Medication Management in the Perioperative Setting: A Review and Illustrative Case of an Adverse Effect of GLP-1 Receptor Agonist.围手术期的降糖药物管理:GLP-1受体激动剂不良反应的综述及实例分析
J Clin Med. 2024 Oct 20;13(20):6259. doi: 10.3390/jcm13206259.
6
Evaluation of the effectiveness regarding the participation of pharmacists in perioperative blood glucose management via the iGMS: a pilot RCT.通过智能血糖管理系统评估药剂师参与围手术期血糖管理的有效性:一项随机对照试验试点研究
Diabetol Metab Syndr. 2023 Nov 17;15(1):236. doi: 10.1186/s13098-023-01221-8.
7
Identification of Risk Factors and Development of a Predictive Model for Postoperative Hypoglycemia among Diabetic Patients during the Perioperative Period.围手术期糖尿病患者术后低血糖危险因素的识别及预测模型的建立
Int J Endocrinol. 2023 Aug 29;2023:8033101. doi: 10.1155/2023/8033101. eCollection 2023.
8
The relationship between components of hypoglycemia worries and avoiding hypoglycemia behavior in type 2 diabetes mellitus with hypoglycemia: a network analysis.低血糖担忧的成分与伴有低血糖的 2 型糖尿病患者避免低血糖行为之间的关系:网络分析。
BMC Psychiatry. 2023 Mar 28;23(1):204. doi: 10.1186/s12888-023-04698-9.
9
Data-based modeling for hypoglycemia prediction: Importance, trends, and implications for clinical practice.基于数据的低血糖预测建模:重要性、趋势及其对临床实践的意义。
Front Public Health. 2023 Jan 26;11:1044059. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1044059. eCollection 2023.
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Jan 4;4(1):e2030913. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.30913.
4
6. Glycemic Targets: .6. 血糖目标: 。
Diabetes Care. 2021 Jan;44(Suppl 1):S73-S84. doi: 10.2337/dc21-S006.
5
Characteristics of Hypoglycemic Diabetic Patients Visiting the Emergency Room.低血糖糖尿病患者就诊于急诊的特征。
Cardiovasc Ther. 2020 Jul 20;2020:3612607. doi: 10.1155/2020/3612607. eCollection 2020.
6
Increased Preoperative Glucose Variability Is Associated with Adverse Perioperative Outcomes Following Orthopedic Surgery in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus.骨科手术治疗 2 型糖尿病患者中,术前血糖变异性增加与不良围手术期结局相关。
Curr Med Sci. 2020 Jun;40(3):523-529. doi: 10.1007/s11596-020-2209-x. Epub 2020 Jul 17.
7
Inpatient Hypoglycemia: The Challenge Remains.住院患者低血糖:挑战依然存在。
J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2020 May;14(3):560-566. doi: 10.1177/1932296820918540.
8
Predicting the Risk of Inpatient Hypoglycemia With Machine Learning Using Electronic Health Records.使用电子健康记录通过机器学习预测住院患者低血糖风险。
Diabetes Care. 2020 Jul;43(7):1504-1511. doi: 10.2337/dc19-1743. Epub 2020 Apr 29.
9
Standards of medical care for type 2 diabetes in China 2019.中国 2019 年 2 型糖尿病医学诊疗标准。
Diabetes Metab Res Rev. 2019 Sep;35(6):e3158. doi: 10.1002/dmrr.3158. Epub 2019 May 29.
10
Derivation and Validation of a Risk-Prediction Tool for Hypoglycemia in Hospitalized Adults With Diabetes: The Hypoglycemia During Hospitalization (HyDHo) Score.住院糖尿病成人低血糖风险预测工具的推导和验证:住院期间低血糖(HyDHo)评分。
Can J Diabetes. 2019 Jun;43(4):278-282.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jcjd.2018.08.061. Epub 2018 Aug 10.