• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

泰国足月新生儿肛门生殖器距离的性别特异性范围和比值。

Sex-specific ranges and ratios for anogenital distance among Thai full-term newborns.

机构信息

Division of Pediatric Endocrinology, Department of Pediatrics, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, 10330, Thailand.

Police General Hospital, Bangkok, Thailand.

出版信息

BMC Pediatr. 2022 May 10;22(1):258. doi: 10.1186/s12887-022-03325-y.

DOI:10.1186/s12887-022-03325-y
PMID:35538518
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9088031/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Anogenital distance (AGD) is a marker of prenatal androgen exposure and a tool for assessment of differences of sex development. Data for AGD in newborns have been published, but these findings may not be applicable to Thai newborns.

AIM

To provide the sex-specific ranges for AGD in Thai full-term newborns.

METHODS

A cross-sectional study was conducted in term newborns in Thailand, during 2016-2018. AGD was measured from anus to anterior base of penis (AGD) and to perineoscrotal junction (AGD) in males and from anus to clitoris (AGD) and to posterior fourchette (AGD) in females. AGD ratio is defined as AGD divided by AGD in males and AGD divided by AGD in females.

RESULTS

A total of 364 newborns were studied (male 51.4%). The mean AGD, AGD and AGD ratio in males were 25.20 ± 4.80, 52.60 ± 6.90 and 0.48 ± 0.08 mm, respectively. The mean AGD, AGD, and AGD ratio in females were 16.50 ± 3.90, 42.60 ± 6.20 and 0.39 ± 0.08 mm, respectively. There were significant differences between AGD and AGD, AGD and AGD, and AGD ratio between males and females (p < 0.001). The AGD, AGD, AGD, AGD were correlated with birth weight and length, but AGD ratio showed no correlation.

CONCLUSION

The sex-specific ranges for AGD in Thai full-term newborns were determined. AGD ratio is a useful marker of prenatal androgen exposure since it differs between sexes, but constant between races and did not vary by body size.

摘要

引言

肛门生殖器距离(AGD)是产前雄激素暴露的标志物,也是评估性别发育差异的工具。已经发表了关于新生儿 AGD 的数据,但这些发现可能不适用于泰国新生儿。

目的

提供泰国足月新生儿 AGD 的性别特异性范围。

方法

本研究为泰国的一项横断面研究,于 2016-2018 年期间纳入足月新生儿。在男性中,AGD 从肛门测量到阴茎前基部(AGD)和会阴阴囊交界处(AGD),在女性中,AGD 从肛门测量到阴蒂(AGD)和后阴唇分叉处(AGD)。AGD 比定义为 AGD 除以男性的 AGD 和 AGD 除以女性的 AGD。

结果

共研究了 364 名新生儿(男性占 51.4%)。男性的平均 AGD、AGD 和 AGD 比分别为 25.20±4.80、52.60±6.90 和 0.48±0.08mm。女性的平均 AGD、AGD 和 AGD 比分别为 16.50±3.90、42.60±6.20 和 0.39±0.08mm。男性和女性之间的 AGD 和 AGD、AGD 和 AGD 以及 AGD 比均存在显著差异(p<0.001)。AGD、AGD、AGD 与出生体重和身长相关,但 AGD 比与两者均不相关。

结论

确定了泰国足月新生儿的 AGD 性别特异性范围。AGD 比是产前雄激素暴露的有用标志物,因为它在性别之间存在差异,但在种族之间保持不变,且不受体型大小的影响。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/60d8/9088031/350e56ac0ad8/12887_2022_3325_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/60d8/9088031/350e56ac0ad8/12887_2022_3325_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/60d8/9088031/350e56ac0ad8/12887_2022_3325_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Sex-specific ranges and ratios for anogenital distance among Thai full-term newborns.泰国足月新生儿肛门生殖器距离的性别特异性范围和比值。
BMC Pediatr. 2022 May 10;22(1):258. doi: 10.1186/s12887-022-03325-y.
2
Associations between maternal urinary isoflavone concentrations and anogenital distance of offspring throughout infancy: a prospective cohort study.母尿中异黄酮浓度与婴儿期外生殖器距离的关联:一项前瞻性队列研究。
Hum Reprod. 2023 Feb 1;38(2):277-292. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deac234.
3
First trimester phthalate exposure and anogenital distance in newborns.孕早期邻苯二甲酸盐暴露与新生儿肛门生殖器距离
Hum Reprod. 2015 Apr;30(4):963-72. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deu363. Epub 2015 Feb 18.
4
Association of pre-pregnancy body mass index and gestational weight gain with neonatal anogenital distance in a Chinese birth cohort.中国出生队列研究中孕妇孕前 BMI 和孕期体重增加与新生儿肛门生殖器距离的关系。
Reprod Health. 2022 Jun 29;19(1):152. doi: 10.1186/s12978-022-01458-y.
5
Anogenital distance and penile width measurements in The Infant Development and the Environment Study (TIDES): methods and predictors.婴儿发育与环境研究(TIDES)中的肛门生殖器距离和阴茎宽度测量:方法与预测因素
J Pediatr Urol. 2015 Apr;11(2):76.e1-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2014.11.018. Epub 2015 Mar 7.
6
Anogenital distance as a phenotypic signature through infancy.通过婴儿期的肛门生殖器距离作为表型特征。
Pediatr Res. 2018 Mar;83(3):573-579. doi: 10.1038/pr.2017.287. Epub 2017 Dec 20.
7
Associations of maternal anthropometrics with newborn anogenital distance and the 2:4 digit ratio.母亲人体测量学与新生儿肛门生殖器距离和 2:4 指长比的关联。
Hum Reprod. 2022 Aug 25;37(9):2154-2166. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deac143.
8
Anogenital distance in children born of mothers with polycystic ovary syndrome: the Odense Child Cohort.多囊卵巢综合征母亲所生儿童的肛殖距:奥登塞儿童队列研究。
Hum Reprod. 2019 Oct 2;34(10):2061-2070. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dez122.
9
Anogenital distance in newborn infants conceived by assisted reproduction and natural conception.经辅助生殖技术和自然受孕新生儿的肛门生殖器距离。
Reprod Biomed Online. 2020 Sep;41(3):474-482. doi: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2020.04.019. Epub 2020 May 14.
10
Prenatal exposure to residential PM and anogenital distance in infants at birth: A birth cohort study from Shanghai, China.产前暴露于居住环境细颗粒物与婴儿出生时的肛门生殖器距离:来自中国上海的一项出生队列研究。
Environ Pollut. 2020 Sep;264:114684. doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2020.114684. Epub 2020 Apr 27.

引用本文的文献

1
Evaluation of Anogenital Distance and Anti-Müllerian Hormone Plasmatic Concentration as Potential Phenotypes to Predict Reproductive Performance in Holstein Heifers.评估肛门生殖距和抗苗勒管激素血浆浓度作为预测荷斯坦小母牛繁殖性能的潜在表型。
Vet Sci. 2024 Oct 12;11(10):495. doi: 10.3390/vetsci11100495.
2
Estimation of Reference Values for External Genitalia Parameters in North Indian Preterm and Term Female Newborns.估算北印度早产儿和足月女婴外生殖器参数的参考值。
Indian J Pediatr. 2024 Jun;91(6):548-555. doi: 10.1007/s12098-023-04743-1. Epub 2023 Jul 25.
3
Estimation of Reference Values for External Genitalia Parameters in North Indian Preterm and Term Male Newborns.

本文引用的文献

1
Prenatal smoke exposure is associated with increased anogenital distance in female infants: a prospective case-control study.产前烟雾暴露与女婴肛门生殖器距离增加有关:一项前瞻性病例对照研究。
J Pediatr Endocrinol Metab. 2020 Oct 9;34(1):79-88. doi: 10.1515/jpem-2020-0363. Print 2021 Jan 27.
2
Anogenital Distance in Healthy Infants: Method-, Age- and Sex-related Reference Ranges.健康婴儿的肛殖距:方法、年龄和性别相关的参考范围。
J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2020 Sep 1;105(9):2996-3004. doi: 10.1210/clinem/dgaa393.
3
Endocrine-sensitive physical endpoints in newborns: ranges and predictors.
印度北部早产儿和足月男婴外生殖器参数参考值的估计。
Indian J Pediatr. 2024 Jun;91(6):556-563. doi: 10.1007/s12098-023-04703-9. Epub 2023 Jun 30.
新生儿内分泌敏感的生理终点:范围和预测因素。
Pediatr Res. 2021 Feb;89(3):660-666. doi: 10.1038/s41390-020-0950-2. Epub 2020 May 12.
4
The External Genitalia Score (EGS): A European Multicenter Validation Study.外阴生殖器评分(EGS):一项欧洲多中心验证研究。
J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2020 Mar 1;105(3). doi: 10.1210/clinem/dgz142.
5
Anogenital distance in children born of mothers with polycystic ovary syndrome: the Odense Child Cohort.多囊卵巢综合征母亲所生儿童的肛殖距:奥登塞儿童队列研究。
Hum Reprod. 2019 Oct 2;34(10):2061-2070. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dez122.
6
Normative data on penile and anogenital measurements of term male infants in Sagamu, Nigeria.尼日利亚萨迦穆足月男婴阴茎和肛门生殖器测量的常模数据。
Acta Paediatr. 2019 Nov;108(11):2041-2047. doi: 10.1111/apa.14885. Epub 2019 Jun 19.
7
The role of exposure to phthalates in variations of anogenital distance: A systematic review and meta-analysis.邻苯二甲酸酯暴露与肛门生殖器距离变异的关系:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Environ Pollut. 2019 Apr;247:172-179. doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2019.01.026. Epub 2019 Jan 9.
8
Anogenital Distance in Term Newborns in Kumasi, Ghana.加纳库马西足月新生儿的肛殖距
Horm Res Paediatr. 2017;88(6):396-400. doi: 10.1159/000479689. Epub 2017 Sep 22.
9
Clitoral Length and Anogenital Ratio in Indian Newborn Girls.印度新生女婴的阴蒂长度与肛门生殖器比值
Indian Pediatr. 2016 Apr;53(4):299-303. doi: 10.1007/s13312-016-0840-1.
10
Anogenital distance and penile width measurements in The Infant Development and the Environment Study (TIDES): methods and predictors.婴儿发育与环境研究(TIDES)中的肛门生殖器距离和阴茎宽度测量:方法与预测因素
J Pediatr Urol. 2015 Apr;11(2):76.e1-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2014.11.018. Epub 2015 Mar 7.