• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

丹麦曲马多中毒的短期死亡率。

Short-term mortality following tramadol poisonings in Denmark.

机构信息

Department of Clinical Pharmacology, Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark.

Copenhagen Phase IV unit (Phase4CPH), Department of Clinical Pharmacology and Center of Clinical Research and Prevention, Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark.

出版信息

Basic Clin Pharmacol Toxicol. 2022 Jul;131(1):83-92. doi: 10.1111/bcpt.13741. Epub 2022 May 17.

DOI:10.1111/bcpt.13741
PMID:35538919
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9324776/
Abstract

Tramadol is a commonly used opioid with a potential of addiction and abuse. Using Danish nationwide registers, we aimed to (1) characterise opioid poisonings; (2) assess the 30-day mortality following morphine, oxycodone, and mixed poisonings compared to tramadol poisonings; and (3) assess the development in tramadol poisonings during a 12-year period. Poisonings were identified from 2006 to 2017. A Cox proportional hazards regression model was used to estimate adjusted hazard ratios (aHRs) along with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for 30-day mortality following morphine, oxycodone or mixed poisonings compared to tramadol poisonings. We identified 7718 opioid poisonings among 6365 patients. The patients with a tramadol poisoning were younger and had less comorbidities than the patients with a morphine, oxycodone or mixed poisoning. Within 30 days, a total of 205 patients died. The 30-day mortality risk was higher following morphine (aHR 3.2, 95% CI 2.0-5.1), oxycodone (aHR 2.1, 95% CI 1.2-3.6) and mixed poisonings (aHR 1.6, 95% CI 1.0-2.7) compared to tramadol poisonings. The annual number of tramadol poisonings increased from 233 in 2006 to 501 in 2013 and declined to 348 in 2017. In conclusion, despite a lower mortality risk compared to other opioid poisonings, physicians should consider the poisoning and abuse risks when prescribing tramadol.

摘要

曲马多是一种常用的阿片类药物,具有成瘾和滥用的潜力。我们使用丹麦全国性登记处,旨在:(1)描述阿片类药物中毒情况;(2)评估吗啡、羟考酮和混合中毒与曲马多中毒相比的 30 天死亡率;(3)评估 12 年期间曲马多中毒的发展情况。中毒情况是从 2006 年至 2017 年确定的。使用 Cox 比例风险回归模型估计 30 天死亡率的调整后危险比(aHR)及其 95%置信区间(CI),吗啡、羟考酮或混合中毒与曲马多中毒相比。我们确定了 6365 名患者中的 7718 例阿片类药物中毒。曲马多中毒患者比吗啡、羟考酮或混合中毒患者年龄更小,合并症更少。在 30 天内,共有 205 名患者死亡。与曲马多中毒相比,吗啡(aHR 3.2,95%CI 2.0-5.1)、羟考酮(aHR 2.1,95%CI 1.2-3.6)和混合中毒(aHR 1.6,95%CI 1.0-2.7)的 30 天死亡率风险更高。曲马多中毒的年发病数从 2006 年的 233 例增加到 2013 年的 501 例,然后下降到 2017 年的 348 例。总之,尽管与其他阿片类药物中毒相比,曲马多中毒的死亡率风险较低,但医生在开曲马多时应考虑中毒和滥用的风险。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eea7/9324776/49c4e6883897/BCPT-131-83-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eea7/9324776/694fcc58f7b6/BCPT-131-83-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eea7/9324776/49c4e6883897/BCPT-131-83-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eea7/9324776/694fcc58f7b6/BCPT-131-83-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eea7/9324776/49c4e6883897/BCPT-131-83-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Short-term mortality following tramadol poisonings in Denmark.丹麦曲马多中毒的短期死亡率。
Basic Clin Pharmacol Toxicol. 2022 Jul;131(1):83-92. doi: 10.1111/bcpt.13741. Epub 2022 May 17.
2
Pharmaceutical opioid poisonings in Victoria, Australia: Rates and characteristics of a decade of emergency department presentations among nine pharmaceutical opioids.澳大利亚维多利亚州的药物类阿片中毒:10 年间 9 种药物类阿片在急诊科就诊的发生率和特征。
Addiction. 2022 Mar;117(3):623-636. doi: 10.1111/add.15653. Epub 2021 Sep 18.
3
Comparison of fatal poisonings by prescription opioids.处方阿片类药物所致致命中毒的比较。
Forensic Sci Int. 2012 Oct 10;222(1-3):327-31. doi: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2012.07.011. Epub 2012 Aug 10.
4
Opioid drug poisonings in Ohio adolescents and young adults, 2002-2014.俄亥俄州青少年和青年成年人的阿片类药物中毒,2002-2014 年。
Clin Toxicol (Phila). 2018 Aug;56(8):765-772. doi: 10.1080/15563650.2018.1424889. Epub 2018 Jan 11.
5
Perforated peptic ulcer and short-term mortality among tramadol users.曲马多使用者中的消化性溃疡穿孔与短期死亡率
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2008 Apr;65(4):565-72. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2125.2007.03038.x. Epub 2007 Oct 8.
6
"Weak" opioid analgesics. Codeine, dihydrocodeine and tramadol: no less risky than morphine.“弱”阿片类镇痛药。可待因、二氢可待因和曲马多:风险不亚于吗啡。
Prescrire Int. 2016 Feb;25(168):45-50.
7
Comparison of Opioids Prescribed for Patients at Risk for Opioid Misuse Before and After Publication of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's Opioid Prescribing Guidelines.比较疾病预防控制中心发布阿片类药物处方指南前后,开给有阿片类药物滥用风险患者的阿片类药物。
JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Dec 1;3(12):e2027481. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.27481.
8
Prescribed opioid analgesic use developments in three Nordic countries, 2006-2017.2006 - 2017年三个北欧国家的处方阿片类镇痛药使用情况发展
Scand J Pain. 2019 Apr 24;19(2):345-353. doi: 10.1515/sjpain-2018-0307.
9
Comparative Risk of Injury with Concurrent Use of Opioids and Skeletal Muscle Relaxants.同时使用阿片类药物和骨骼肌松弛剂的损伤风险比较。
Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2024 Jul;116(1):117-127. doi: 10.1002/cpt.3248. Epub 2024 Mar 14.
10
The opioid epidemic: A worldwide exploratory study using the WHO pharmacovigilance database.阿片类药物流行:使用世界卫生组织药物警戒数据库进行的全球探索性研究。
Addiction. 2023 Apr;118(4):771-775. doi: 10.1111/add.16081. Epub 2022 Nov 22.

引用本文的文献

1
A comparative study of postmortem distribution and postmortem diffusion of tramadol in rabbits.曲马多死后在兔体内分布和死后扩散的比较研究。
Sci Rep. 2023 Jan 30;13(1):1702. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-25459-w.

本文引用的文献

1
Use of tramadol and other analgesics following media attention and risk minimization actions from regulators: a Danish nationwide drug utilization study.在媒体关注和监管机构采取风险最小化措施后,曲马多和其他镇痛药的使用:一项丹麦全国药物利用研究。
Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2021 Apr;77(4):617-624. doi: 10.1007/s00228-020-03016-6. Epub 2020 Oct 28.
2
Trends in severe opioid-related poisonings and fatalities reported to the Paris poison control center - a 10-year retrospective observational study.巴黎中毒控制中心报告的严重阿片类药物相关中毒和致死趋势-一项 10 年回顾性观察研究。
Fundam Clin Pharmacol. 2020 Aug;34(4):495-503. doi: 10.1111/fcp.12534. Epub 2020 Jan 29.
3
A 15-year overview of increasing tramadol utilisation and associated mortality and the impact of tramadol classification in the United Kingdom.
英国曲马多使用量增加、相关死亡率及曲马多分类影响的15年概述。
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2018 May;27(5):487-494. doi: 10.1002/pds.4320. Epub 2017 Sep 24.
4
[Potential pharmacological consequences of the development of the opioid consumption in Denmark].[丹麦阿片类药物消费增长的潜在药理学后果]
Ugeskr Laeger. 2017 Jun 26;179(26).
5
Data Resource Profile: Danish online drug use statistics (MEDSTAT).数据资源简介:丹麦在线药物使用统计数据(MEDSTAT)
Int J Epidemiol. 2016 Oct;45(5):1401-1402g. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyw116. Epub 2016 Oct 8.
6
The Danish National Patient Registry: a review of content, data quality, and research potential.丹麦国家患者登记处:内容、数据质量及研究潜力综述
Clin Epidemiol. 2015 Nov 17;7:449-90. doi: 10.2147/CLEP.S91125. eCollection 2015.
7
Tramadol overdose causes seizures and respiratory depression but serotonin toxicity appears unlikely.曲马多过量会导致癫痫发作和呼吸抑制,但血清素中毒似乎不太可能。
Clin Toxicol (Phila). 2015 Jul;53(6):545-50. doi: 10.3109/15563650.2015.1036279. Epub 2015 Apr 22.
8
Schedule of controlled substances: placement of tramadol into schedule IV. Final rule.受管制物质清单:将曲马多列入第四类。最终规则。
Fed Regist. 2014 Jul 2;79(127):37623-30.
9
The Danish Civil Registration System as a tool in epidemiology.丹麦民事登记系统在流行病学中的应用。
Eur J Epidemiol. 2014 Aug;29(8):541-9. doi: 10.1007/s10654-014-9930-3. Epub 2014 Jun 26.
10
Cardiogenic shock due to acute tramadol intoxication.急性曲马多中毒致心原性休克。
Cardiovasc Toxicol. 2015 Jan;15(1):100-3. doi: 10.1007/s12012-014-9262-2.