Brovarets' Ol'ha O, Tsiupa Kostiantyn S, Hovorun Dmytro M
Department of Molecular and Quantum Biophysics, Institute of Molecular Biology and Genetics, National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine 150 Akademika Zabolotnoho Str. 03680 Kyiv Ukraine
Department of Molecular Biotechnology and Bioinformatics, Institute of High Technologies, Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv 2-h Akademika Hlushkova Ave. 03022 Kyiv Ukraine.
RSC Adv. 2018 Apr 10;8(24):13433-13445. doi: 10.1039/c8ra01446a. eCollection 2018 Apr 9.
In this study for the first time we have revealed by QM and QTAIM calculations at the MP2/aug-cc-pVDZ//B3LYP/6-311++G(d,p) level of QM theory the novel routes of the mutagenic tautomerization of three biologically important A·T DNA base pairs - reverse Watson-Crick A·T(rWC), Hoogsteen A·T(H) and reverse Hoogsteen A·T(rH) - followed by their rebuilding into the wobble (w) A·T*(rw), A·T*(w) and A·T*(rw) base mispairs by the participation of the mutagenic tautomers of the DNA bases (denoted by asterisk) and , thus complementing the physico-chemical property of the canonical A·T(WC) Watson-Crick DNA base pair reported earlier (Brovarets' , , 2015, , 99594-99605). These non-dissociative tautomeric transformations in the classical A·T(rWC), A·T(H) and A·T(rH) DNA base pairs proceed similarly to the canonical A·T(WC) DNA base pair the intrapair sequential proton transfer with shifting towards major or minor grooves of DNA followed by further double proton transfer along the intermolecular H-bonds and are controlled by the plane symmetric and highly stable transition states - tight ion pairs formed by the A nucleobase, protonated by the N1/N7 nitrogen atoms, and T nucleobase, deprotonated by the N3H imino group. Comparison of the estimated populations of the tautomerised states (10 to 10) with similar characteristics for the canonical A·T(WC) DNA base pair (10 to 10) leads authors to the conclusion, that only a base pair with WC architecture can be a building block of the DNA macromolecule as a genetic material, which is able for the evolutionary self-development. Among all four classical DNA base pairs, only A·T(WC) DNA base pair can ensure the proper rate of the spontaneous point errors of replication in DNA.
在本研究中,我们首次通过量子力学(QM)和量子拓扑原子分子理论(QTAIM)计算,在QM理论的MP2/aug-cc-pVDZ//B3LYP/6-311++G(d,p)水平上揭示了三种具有生物学重要性的A·T DNA碱基对——反向沃森-克里克A·T(rWC)、霍格施泰因A·T(H)和反向霍格施泰因A·T(rH)——诱变互变异构化的新途径,随后通过DNA碱基的诱变互变异构体(用星号表示)的参与,它们重新构建为摆动(w)A·T*(rw)、A·T*(w)和A·T*(rw)碱基错配,从而补充了先前报道的经典A·T(WC)沃森-克里克DNA碱基对的物理化学性质(Brovarets',,2015,,99594 - 99605)。经典A·T(rWC)、A·T(H)和A·T(rH)DNA碱基对中的这些非解离互变异构转变与经典A·T(WC)DNA碱基对的过程类似——通过向DNA的大沟或小沟移动进行配对内顺序质子转移,随后沿着分子间氢键进行进一步的双质子转移,并由平面对称且高度稳定的过渡态控制——由被N1/N7氮原子质子化的A核碱基和被N3H亚氨基去质子化的T核碱基形成紧密离子对。将互变异构态的估计丰度(10至10)与经典A·T(WC)DNA碱基对的类似特征(10至10)进行比较,作者得出结论,即只有具有WC结构的碱基对才能作为遗传物质的DNA大分子的构建块,它能够进行进化自我发展。在所有四种经典DNA碱基对中,只有A·T(WC)DNA碱基对能够确保DNA复制中自发点错误的适当速率。