• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

医疗资格标准和 OPTN 政策对肝肾联合分配与利用的影响。

Impact of medical eligibility criteria and OPTN policy on simultaneous liver kidney allocation and utilization.

机构信息

Department of Medicine, University of South Dakota Sanford School of Medicine, Sioux Falls, South Dakota, USA.

Avera McKennan University Hospital and Transplant Institute, Sioux Falls, South Dakota, USA.

出版信息

Clin Transplant. 2022 Jul;36(7):e14700. doi: 10.1111/ctr.14700. Epub 2022 Jun 1.

DOI:10.1111/ctr.14700
PMID:35543138
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9930183/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network (OPTN) implemented medical eligibility and safety-net policy on 8/10/17 to optimize simultaneous liver-kidney (SLK) utilization. We examined impact of this policy on SLK listings and number of kidneys used within 1-yr. of receiving liver transplantation (LT) alone.

METHODS AND RESULTS

OPTN database (08/10/14-06/12/20) on adults (N = 66 709) without previous transplant stratified candidates to listings for SLK or LT alone with pre-LT renal dysfunction at listing (eGFR < 30 mL/min or on dialysis). Outcomes were compared for pre (08/10/14-08/09/17) vs. post (08/10/17-06/12/20) policy era. SLK listings decreased in post vs. pre policy era (8.7% vs. 9.6%; P < .001), with 22% reduced odds of SLK listing in the postpolicy era, with a decrease in all OPTN regions except regions 6 and 8, which showed an increase. Among LT-alone recipients with pre-LT renal dysfunction (N = 3272), cumulative 1-year probability was higher in post vs. prepolicy period for dialysis (5.6% vs. 2.3%; P < .0001), KT listing (11.4% vs. 2.0%; P < .0001), and KT (3.7% vs. .25%; P < .0001). Sixty-seven (2.4%) kidneys were saved in post policy era, with 18.1%, 16.6%, 4.3%, and 2.9% saving from regions 7, 2, 11, and 1, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Medical eligibility and safety-net OPTN policy resulted in decreased SLK use and improved access to LT alone among those with pre-LT renal dysfunction. Although decreased in postpolicy era, regional variation of SLK listings remains. In spite of increased use of KT within 1-year of receiving LT alone under safety net, less number of kidneys were used without impact on patient survival in postpolicy era.

摘要

背景

器官获取与移植网络(OPTN)于 2017 年 8 月 10 日实施了医疗资格和安全网政策,以优化同时肝-肾(SLK)的利用。我们研究了该政策对 SLK 清单和单独接受肝移植(LT)后 1 年内使用的肾脏数量的影响。

方法和结果

OPTN 数据库(2014 年 8 月 10 日至 2020 年 6 月 12 日)对没有先前移植的成年人(N=66709)进行分层,以进行 SLK 或单独 LT 的列表,在列表时具有 LT 前肾功能障碍(eGFR<30 mL/min 或透析)。比较了政策前(2014 年 8 月 10 日至 2017 年 8 月 9 日)与政策后(2017 年 8 月 10 日至 2020 年 6 月 12 日)时期的结果。与政策前相比,政策后 SLK 清单减少(8.7%对 9.6%;P<.001),政策后 SLK 清单的可能性降低了 22%,除了第 6 和第 8 区之外,所有 OPTN 区的清单都减少了,而这两个区的清单则有所增加。在 LT 单独接受者中,LT 前有肾功能障碍(N=3272),政策后第 1 年的累积 1 年概率高于政策前,透析(5.6%对 2.3%;P<.0001)、KT 清单(11.4%对 2.0%;P<.0001)和 KT(3.7%对.25%;P<.0001)。在政策后时期节省了 67(2.4%)个肾脏,分别有 18.1%、16.6%、4.3%和 2.9%来自第 7、2、11 和 1 区。

结论

医疗资格和安全网 OPTN 政策导致 SLK 使用减少,并改善了 LT 单独接受者中 LT 前肾功能障碍的机会。尽管政策后时期有所减少,但 SLK 清单的区域差异仍然存在。尽管在安全网下单独接受 LT 后 1 年内 KT 的使用有所增加,但在政策后时期,使用的肾脏数量减少,而不会影响患者的生存。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6d81/9930183/891de5bd08c5/nihms-1829086-f0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6d81/9930183/7a331e37d899/nihms-1829086-f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6d81/9930183/9b35139cc8b0/nihms-1829086-f0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6d81/9930183/891de5bd08c5/nihms-1829086-f0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6d81/9930183/7a331e37d899/nihms-1829086-f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6d81/9930183/9b35139cc8b0/nihms-1829086-f0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6d81/9930183/891de5bd08c5/nihms-1829086-f0003.jpg

相似文献

1
Impact of medical eligibility criteria and OPTN policy on simultaneous liver kidney allocation and utilization.医疗资格标准和 OPTN 政策对肝肾联合分配与利用的影响。
Clin Transplant. 2022 Jul;36(7):e14700. doi: 10.1111/ctr.14700. Epub 2022 Jun 1.
2
Developing simultaneous liver-kidney transplant medical eligibility criteria while providing a safety net: A 2-year review of the OPTN's allocation policy.制定肝肾联合移植医学准入标准的同时提供安全网:OPTN 分配政策的两年回顾。
Am J Transplant. 2021 Nov;21(11):3593-3607. doi: 10.1111/ajt.16761. Epub 2021 Aug 4.
3
Paradigm Change in Liver Transplantation Practice After the Implementation of the Liver-Kidney Allocation Policy.肝肾联合分配政策实施后肝移植实践的范式转变
Liver Transpl. 2021 Nov;27(11):1563-1576. doi: 10.1002/lt.26107. Epub 2021 Aug 16.
4
Waitlist and post-transplant outcomes among candidates listed for liver transplant: Liver alone versus simultaneous liver kidney listings.肝移植候选者的候补名单和移植后结果:单独肝移植与肝肾同期联合移植。
Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2023 Nov;58(9):929-937. doi: 10.1111/apt.17700. Epub 2023 Sep 13.
5
Impact on Waitlist Outcomes from Changes in the Medical Eligibility of Candidates for Simultaneous Liver-Kidney Transplantation Following Implementation of the 2017 Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network/United Network for Organ Sharing Policy in the United States.美国 2017 年器官获取与移植网络/器官共享联合网络政策实施后,候选者同时进行肝肾移植的医学资格变化对候补者结果的影响。
Ann Transplant. 2022 Feb 18;27:e934850. doi: 10.12659/AOT.934850.
6
The liver recipient with acute renal dysfunction: A single institution evaluation of the simultaneous liver-kidney transplant candidate.伴有急性肾功能不全的肝移植受者:单中心对肝肾联合移植候选者的评估
Clin Transplant. 2018 Jan;32(1). doi: 10.1111/ctr.13148. Epub 2017 Nov 24.
7
The impact of the OPTN policy change on patients with a durable left ventricular assist device and chronic kidney disease: Analysis of the UNOS database.OPTN 政策变化对具有耐用性左心室辅助装置和慢性肾脏病患者的影响:UNOS 数据库分析。
Artif Organs. 2024 Oct;48(10):1180-1189. doi: 10.1111/aor.14770. Epub 2024 May 27.
8
Simultaneous liver kidney allocation policy and the Safety Net: an early examination of utilization and outcomes in the United States.同时肝肾分配政策与安全网:美国对其使用和结果的早期考察。
Transpl Int. 2021 Jun;34(6):1052-1064. doi: 10.1111/tri.13891. Epub 2021 May 19.
9
Refining the Role of Simultaneous Liver Kidney Transplantation.优化肝肾联合移植的作用
J Clin Transl Hepatol. 2018 Sep 28;6(3):289-295. doi: 10.14218/JCTH.2017.00065. Epub 2018 Jun 8.
10
Outcomes of simultaneous liver-kidney transplantation: implications for patient selection.肝-肾联合移植的结局:对患者选择的影响。
Curr Opin Organ Transplant. 2018 Apr;23(2):264-270. doi: 10.1097/MOT.0000000000000501.

引用本文的文献

1
Sex-based Differences and Comparative Predictive Value of MELD 3.0 in Simultaneous Liver-Kidney Transplantation Waitlist Outcomes After Standardization of Listing Criteria in the United States.美国肝脏移植标准统一后,肝肾联合移植等待名单结果中基于性别的差异及MELD 3.0的比较预测价值
Transplant Direct. 2025 Apr 9;11(5):e1781. doi: 10.1097/TXD.0000000000001781. eCollection 2025 May.
2
New kidney-after-heart allocation policy in the United States: Who would benefit from a rescue kidney?美国新的心脏移植后肾脏分配政策:谁将从救助性肾脏中获益?
J Heart Lung Transplant. 2025 Jul;44(7):1083-1092. doi: 10.1016/j.healun.2025.01.002. Epub 2025 Jan 16.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Developing simultaneous liver-kidney transplant medical eligibility criteria while providing a safety net: A 2-year review of the OPTN's allocation policy.制定肝肾联合移植医学准入标准的同时提供安全网:OPTN 分配政策的两年回顾。
Am J Transplant. 2021 Nov;21(11):3593-3607. doi: 10.1111/ajt.16761. Epub 2021 Aug 4.
2
Black Patients Have Unequal Access to Listing for Liver Transplantation in the United States.美国的黑人患者在接受肝移植名单方面存在不平等的机会。
Hepatology. 2021 Sep;74(3):1523-1532. doi: 10.1002/hep.31837.
3
The Impact of the 2017 Kidney Allocation Policy Change on Simultaneous Liver-Kidney Utilization and Outcomes.
Current status of simultaneous liver-kidney transplantation.
肝肾联合移植的现状
Hepatol Forum. 2024 Mar 22;5(4):207-210. doi: 10.14744/hf.2023.2023.0071. eCollection 2024.
2017 年肾脏分配政策变化对肝肾联合应用及其结果的影响。
Liver Transpl. 2021 Aug;27(8):1106-1115. doi: 10.1002/lt.26053. Epub 2021 Jul 14.
4
Changing Population of Liver Transplant Recipients in the Era of Direct-acting Antiviral Therapy.直接抗病毒治疗时代肝移植受者群体的变化
J Clin Transl Hepatol. 2020 Sep 28;8(3):262-266. doi: 10.14218/JCTH.2020.00032. Epub 2020 Aug 10.
5
Management of Hepatorenal Syndrome: A Review.肝肾综合征的管理:综述
J Clin Transl Hepatol. 2020 Jun 28;8(2):192-199. doi: 10.14218/JCTH.2020.00011. Epub 2020 Jun 1.
6
Survival and renal function after liver transplantation alone in patients meeting the new United Network for Organ Sharing simultaneous liver-kidney criteria.新的美国器官共享联合网络同期肝肾联合移植标准患者中行单纯肝移植后的生存和肾功能。
Clin Transplant. 2020 Oct;34(10):e14020. doi: 10.1111/ctr.14020. Epub 2020 Jul 17.
7
Liver transplantation for alcoholic hepatitis in the United States: Excellent outcomes with profound temporal and geographic variation in frequency.美国酒精性肝炎的肝移植:疗效卓越,但频率存在显著的时间和地理差异。
Am J Transplant. 2021 Mar;21(3):1039-1055. doi: 10.1111/ajt.16143. Epub 2020 Aug 13.
8
Quantifying Sex-Based Disparities in Liver Allocation.量化肝移植分配中的性别差异。
JAMA Surg. 2020 Jul 1;155(7):e201129. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2020.1129. Epub 2020 Jul 15.
9
Difference in Survival in Early Kidney after Liver Transplantation Compared with Simultaneous Liver-Kidney Transplantation: Evaluating the Potential of the "Safety Net".肝移植后早期肾功能与同期肝肾联合移植患者的生存差异:评估“安全网”的潜力。
J Am Coll Surg. 2020 Apr;230(4):463-473. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2019.12.017. Epub 2020 Jan 30.
10
News in pathophysiology, definition and classification of hepatorenal syndrome: A step beyond the International Club of Ascites (ICA) consensus document.肝性肾病综合征的病理生理学、定义和分类的新进展:超越国际腹水俱乐部(ICA)共识文件的一步。
J Hepatol. 2019 Oct;71(4):811-822. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2019.07.002. Epub 2019 Jul 11.