Department of Psychology, Bournemouth University, Poole, UK.
The School of Psychology, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK.
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2023 Apr;76(4):942-960. doi: 10.1177/17470218221102887. Epub 2022 Jun 28.
People show systematic biases in perception, memory, attention, and decision-making to prioritise information related to self, reward, and positive emotion. A long-standing set of experimental findings points towards putative common properties of these effects. However, the relationship between them remains largely unknown. Here, we addressed this question by assessing and linking these prioritisation effects generated by a common associative matching procedure in three experiments. Self, reward, and positive emotion prioritisation effects were assessed using cluster and shift function analyses to explore and test associations between these effects across individuals. Cluster analysis revealed two distinct patterns of the relationship between the biases. Individuals with faster responses showed a smaller reward and linear positive association between reward and emotion biases. Individuals with slower responses demonstrated a large reward and no association between reward and emotion biases. No evidence of the relationship between self and value-based reward or positive emotion prioritisation effects was found among the clusters. A shift function indicated a partial dominance of high-reward over low-reward distributions at later processing stages in participants with slower but not faster responses. Full stochastic dominance of self-relevance over others and positive over neutral emotion was pertinent to each subgroup of participants. Our findings suggest the independent origin of the self-prioritisation effect. In contrast, commonalities in cognitive mechanisms supporting value-based reward and positive emotion processing are subject to individual differences. These findings add important evidence to a steadily growing research base about the relationship between basic behavioural drivers.
人们在感知、记忆、注意和决策中表现出系统的偏差,以优先处理与自我、奖励和积极情绪相关的信息。一系列长期的实验发现指向这些效应的假设共同特性。然而,它们之间的关系在很大程度上仍然未知。在这里,我们通过评估和链接三个实验中通过共同的联想匹配程序产生的这些优先化效应来解决这个问题。使用聚类和移位函数分析来评估自我、奖励和积极情绪的优先化效应,以探索和测试个体之间这些效应之间的关联。聚类分析揭示了这些偏差之间关系的两种不同模式。反应较快的个体表现出较小的奖励和奖励与情绪偏差之间的线性正相关。反应较慢的个体表现出较大的奖励,奖励与情绪偏差之间没有关联。在聚类中没有发现自我与基于价值的奖励或积极情绪优先化效应之间的关系的证据。移位函数表明,在反应较慢的参与者的后期处理阶段,高奖励分布对低奖励分布具有部分优势,而反应较快的参与者则没有。自我相关性对他人和积极情绪的完全随机优势适用于每个参与者亚组。我们的研究结果表明,自我优先化效应的起源是独立的。相比之下,支持基于价值的奖励和积极情绪处理的认知机制的共性受到个体差异的影响。这些发现为关于基本行为驱动因素之间关系的不断增长的研究基础增添了重要证据。