Suppr超能文献

基于临床发现预测复杂阑尾炎:Alvarado 和阑尾炎炎症反应评分的作用。

Predicting complicated appendicitis based on clinical findings: the role of Alvarado and Appendicitis Inflammatory Response scores.

机构信息

Department of Visceral Surgery, University Centre for Gastrointestinal and Liver Diseases, St. Clara Hospital and University Hospital Basel, Spitalstrasse 21, 4031, Clarunis Basel, Switzerland.

Department of General, Visceral and Pediatric Surgery, University Medical Center, Goettingen, Goettingen, Germany.

出版信息

Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2022 Aug;407(5):2051-2057. doi: 10.1007/s00423-022-02533-5. Epub 2022 May 11.

Abstract

PURPOSE

The pre-interventional differentiation between complicated and uncomplicated appendicitis is decisive for treatment. In the context of conservative therapy, the definitive diagnosis of uncomplicated appendicitis is mandatory. This study investigates the ability of clinical scoring systems and imaging to differentiate between the two entities.

METHODS

This is a retrospective analysis of two cohorts from two tertiary referral centers in Switzerland and Germany. All consecutive patients underwent appendectomy between January 2008 and April 2013 (in the first cohort) or between January 2017 and June 2019 (the second cohort). Exclusion criteria did not apply as all patients found by the database search and received an appendectomy were included. Diagnostic testing and calculation of a receiver operating curve were performed to identify a cutoff for clinical scores that resulted in a minimum sensitivity of 90% to detect complicated appendicitis. The cutoff was combined with additional diagnostic imaging criteria to see if diagnostic properties could be improved.

RESULTS

Nine hundred fifty-six patients were included in the analysis. Two hundred twenty patients (23%) had complicated appendicitis, and 736 patients (77%) had uncomplicated appendicitis or no inflammation. The complicated appendicitis cohort had a mean Alvarado score of 7.03 and a mean AIR of 5.21. This compared to a mean Alvarado of 6.53 and a mean AIR of 4.07 for the uncomplicated appendicitis cohort. The highest Alvarado score with a sensitivity of > 90% to detect complicated appendicitis was ≧ 5 (sensitivity = 95%, specificity 8.99%). The highest AIR score with a sensitivity of > 90% to detect complicated appendicitis was ≧ 3 (sensitivity 91.82%, specificity 18.53). The analysis showed that additional CT information did not improve the sensitivity of the proposed cut-offs.

CONCLUSION

AIR and Alvarado scores showed limited capability to distinguish between complicated and uncomplicated appendicitis even with additional imaging in this retrospective cohort. As conservative management of appendicitis needs to exclude patients with complicated disease reliably, appendectomy seems until now to remain the safest option to prevent undertreatment of this mostly benign disease.

摘要

目的

术前区分复杂性和单纯性阑尾炎对治疗至关重要。在保守治疗的背景下,明确诊断单纯性阑尾炎是必需的。本研究旨在探讨临床评分系统和影像学检查在区分这两种疾病方面的能力。

方法

这是瑞士和德国两个三级转诊中心的两个队列的回顾性分析。所有连续患者均于 2008 年 1 月至 2013 年 4 月(第一队列)或 2017 年 1 月至 2019 年 6 月(第二队列)期间接受阑尾切除术。排除标准不适用,因为数据库搜索发现并接受阑尾切除术的所有患者均被纳入。进行诊断性检查并计算受试者工作特征曲线,以确定临床评分的截断值,该截断值的灵敏度最低为 90%,以检测复杂性阑尾炎。将截断值与额外的诊断影像学标准相结合,以观察是否可以提高诊断性能。

结果

共纳入 956 例患者进行分析。220 例(23%)患者患有复杂性阑尾炎,736 例(77%)患者患有单纯性阑尾炎或无炎症。复杂性阑尾炎组的平均 Alvarado 评分为 7.03,平均 AIR 为 5.21。相比之下,单纯性阑尾炎组的平均 Alvarado 评分为 6.53,平均 AIR 为 4.07。具有最高灵敏度(>90%)以检测复杂性阑尾炎的最高 Alvarado 评分≧5(灵敏度 95%,特异性 8.99%)。具有最高灵敏度(>90%)以检测复杂性阑尾炎的最高 AIR 评分≧3(灵敏度 91.82%,特异性 18.53%)。分析表明,在该回顾性队列中,附加 CT 信息并未提高建议截断值的敏感性。

结论

即使在该回顾性队列中增加了影像学信息,AIR 和 Alvarado 评分在区分复杂性和单纯性阑尾炎方面的能力也有限。由于需要可靠地排除患有复杂性疾病的患者进行保守治疗,因此到目前为止,阑尾切除术似乎仍然是预防这种大多数良性疾病治疗不足的最安全选择。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f6a7/9399057/9c0c464b7a31/423_2022_2533_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验