Suppr超能文献

基于粪便免疫化学试验的结直肠癌筛查项目中计算机辅助检测系统的效果:一项随机对照试验(AIFIT 研究)。

Efficacy of a computer-aided detection system in a fecal immunochemical test-based organized colorectal cancer screening program: a randomized controlled trial (AIFIT study).

机构信息

Gastroenterology Unit, Valduce Hospital, Como, Italy.

Foundation IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Milan, Italy.

出版信息

Endoscopy. 2022 Dec;54(12):1171-1179. doi: 10.1055/a-1849-6878. Epub 2022 May 11.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Computer-aided detection (CADe) increases adenoma detection in primary screening colonoscopy. The potential benefit of CADe in a fecal immunochemical test (FIT)-based colorectal cancer (CRC) screening program is unknown. This study assessed whether use of CADe increases the adenoma detection rate (ADR) in a FIT-based CRC screening program.

METHODS

In a multicenter, randomized trial, FIT-positive individuals aged 50-74 years undergoing colonoscopy, were randomized (1:1) to receive high definition white-light (HDWL) colonoscopy, with or without a real-time deep-learning CADe by endoscopists with baseline ADR > 25 %. The primary outcome was ADR. Secondary outcomes were mean number of adenomas per colonoscopy (APC) and advanced adenoma detection rate (advanced-ADR). Subgroup analysis according to baseline endoscopists' ADR (≤ 40 %, 41 %-45 %, ≥ 46 %) was also performed.

RESULTS

800 individuals (median age 61.0 years [interquartile range 55-67]; 409 men) were included: 405 underwent CADe-assisted colonoscopy and 395 underwent HDWL colonoscopy alone. ADR and APC were significantly higher in the CADe group than in the HDWL arm: ADR 53.6 % (95 %CI 48.6 %-58.5 %) vs. 45.3 % (95 %CI 40.3 %-50.45 %; RR 1.18; 95 %CI 1.03-1.36); APC 1.13 (SD 1.54) vs. 0.90 (SD 1.32;  = 0.03). No significant difference in advanced-ADR was found (18.5 % [95 %CI 14.8 %-22.6 %] vs. 15.9 % [95 %CI 12.5 %-19.9 %], respectively). An increase in ADR was observed in all endoscopist groups regardless of baseline ADR.

CONCLUSIONS

Incorporating CADe significantly increased ADR and APC in the framework of a FIT-based CRC screening program. The impact of CADe appeared to be consistent regardless of endoscopist baseline ADR.

摘要

背景

计算机辅助检测(CADe)可提高结肠镜检查初级筛查中的腺瘤检出率。CADe 在粪便免疫化学检测(FIT)为基础的结直肠癌(CRC)筛查项目中的潜在获益尚不清楚。本研究评估了在 FIT 为基础的 CRC 筛查项目中使用 CADe 是否会提高腺瘤检出率(ADR)。

方法

在一项多中心、随机试验中,接受结肠镜检查的 FIT 阳性、年龄在 50-74 岁之间的个体,按 1:1 比例随机分为接受高清白光(HDWL)结肠镜检查的组,或接受有基线 ADR>25%的内镜医师实时使用深度学习 CADe 的组。主要结局是 ADR。次要结局是每例结肠镜检查的平均腺瘤数(APC)和高级别腺瘤检出率(advanced-ADR)。还根据基线内镜医师 ADR(≤40%、41%-45%、≥46%)进行了亚组分析。

结果

共纳入 800 名个体(中位年龄 61.0 岁[四分位间距 55-67];409 名男性):405 名接受 CADe 辅助结肠镜检查,395 名仅接受 HDWL 结肠镜检查。CADe 组的 ADR 和 APC 显著高于 HDWL 组:ADR 为 53.6%(95%CI 48.6%-58.5%) vs. 45.3%(95%CI 40.3%-50.45%;RR 1.18;95%CI 1.03-1.36);APC 为 1.13(SD 1.54) vs. 0.90(SD 1.32;P=0.03)。两组 advanced-ADR 无显著差异(分别为 18.5%[95%CI 14.8%-22.6%]和 15.9%[95%CI 12.5%-19.9%])。所有内镜医师组的 ADR 均有增加,而不论基线 ADR 如何。

结论

在 FIT 为基础的 CRC 筛查项目中纳入 CADe 可显著提高 ADR 和 APC。CADe 的影响似乎与内镜医师的基线 ADR 无关。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验