Lagström Ronja Maria Birgitta, Bräuner Karoline Bendix, Bielik Julia, Rosen Andreas Weinberger, Crone Julie Gräs, Gögenur Ismail, Bulut Mustafa
Department of Surgery, Zealand University Hospital Koge, Køge, Denmark.
Department of Surgery, Slagelse Hospital, Slagelse, Denmark.
Endosc Int Open. 2025 Feb 26;13:a25215169. doi: 10.1055/a-2521-5169. eCollection 2025.
Adenoma detection rate (ADR) is a key performance measure with variability among endoscopists. Artificial intelligence (AI) in colonoscopy could reduce this variability and has shown to improve ADR. This study assessed the impact of AI on ADR among Danish endoscopists of varying experience levels.
We conducted a prospective, quasi-randomized, controlled, multicenter trial involving patients aged 18 and older undergoing screening, surveillance, and diagnostic colonoscopy at four centers. Participants were assigned to AI-assisted colonoscopy (GI Genius, Medtronic) or conventional colonoscopy. Endoscopists were classified as experts (> 1000 colonoscopies) or non-experts (≤ 1000 colonoscopies). The primary outcome was ADR. We performed a subgroup analysis stratified on endoscopist experience and a subset analysis of the screening population.
A total of 795 patients were analyzed: 400 in the AI group and 395 in the control group. The AI group demonstrated a significantly higher ADR than the control group (59.1% vs. 46.6%, < 0.001). The increase was significant among experts (59.9% vs. 47.3%, < 0.002) but not among non-experts. AI assistance significantly improved ADR (74.4% vs. 58.1%, = 0.003) in screening colonoscopies. Polyp detection rate (PDR) was also higher in the AI group (69.8% vs. 56.2%, < 0.001). There was no significant difference in the non-neoplastic resection rate (NNRR) (15.1% vs. 17.1%, = 0.542).
AI-assisted colonoscopy significantly increased ADR by 12.5% overall, with a notable 16.3% increase in the screening population. The unchanged NNRR indicates that the higher PDR was due to increased ADR, not unnecessary resections.
腺瘤检出率(ADR)是一项关键的绩效指标,不同内镜医师之间存在差异。结肠镜检查中的人工智能(AI)可以减少这种差异,并已证明能提高ADR。本研究评估了AI对不同经验水平的丹麦内镜医师ADR的影响。
我们进行了一项前瞻性、准随机、对照、多中心试验,纳入了在四个中心接受筛查、监测和诊断性结肠镜检查的18岁及以上患者。参与者被分配至AI辅助结肠镜检查组(GI Genius,美敦力公司)或传统结肠镜检查组。内镜医师被分为专家(>1000例结肠镜检查)或非专家(≤1000例结肠镜检查)。主要结局为ADR。我们进行了基于内镜医师经验分层的亚组分析以及筛查人群的子集分析。
共分析了795例患者:AI组400例,对照组395例。AI组的ADR显著高于对照组(59.1%对46.6%,<0.001)。专家中ADR的增加显著(59.9%对47.3%,<0.002),但非专家中无显著增加。在筛查性结肠镜检查中,AI辅助显著提高了ADR(74.4%对58.1%,=0.003)。AI组的息肉检出率(PDR)也更高(69.8%对56.2%,<0.001)。非肿瘤性切除率(NNRR)无显著差异(15.1%对17.1%,=0.542)。
AI辅助结肠镜检查总体上使ADR显著提高了12.5%,筛查人群中显著提高了16.3%。NNRR未变表明较高的PDR是由于ADR增加,而非不必要的切除。