Xu Q Y, Xue H, Yang J, He S N, Lan Y J, Zhang Q
Department of Occupational Health and Environmental Health, West China of Public Health (West China No. 4 Hospital), Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, China.
Department of Health Examination, Chongqing Section of Center for Disease Prevention and Control, China Railway Chengdu Group Co., Ltd, Chongqing 400014, China.
Zhonghua Lao Dong Wei Sheng Zhi Ye Bing Za Zhi. 2022 Apr 20;40(4):267-271. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn121094-20210318-00154.
To explore the influential factors of job stress suffered by workers in railway stations, the level of job stress of were measured and subjective comfort of employees targeting to working environment were reported. In March 2019, a cluster sampling study was designed to collect the personal characteristics, job characteristics and subjective comfort degree of working environment of 432 employees in Chongqing railway stations. Meanwhile, job stress was assessed using the effort-reward imbalance scale. Chi-square test was used to compare the difference of occupational stress detection rate among different stratified factors such as occupational characteristics. Logistic regression was applied to analyze the influential factors of occupational stress. The detection rate of job stress of workers in the railway stations was 31.02% (134/432) . The detection rate of job stress was higher among the divorced workers in railway stations, those earning less than 5, 000 yuan per month, those with 10-20 years' length of service, those who worked as a conductor and other workers including baggageman, station master on duty and assistant engineer (χ(2)=9.61, 14.76, 23.28, 11.06, =0.008, 0.002, 0.000, 0.011) . The detection rate of job stress was higher among those whose working environment subjective feelings were uncomfortable, the differences were statistically significant (<0.001) . The results showed that the occupational stress of the staff in the railway stations was influenced by their subjective feeling of air quality, noise and Space Layout (<0.05) . The risk factors of occupational stress were air quality, noise and uncomfortable space layout (=0.571, 0.068, 0.441, =0.051, 0.054, 0.007) . Conductor, other (Bellboy, Duty Station Master, assistant engineer) were the risk factors of occupational stress (=1.884, 2.703, =0.065, 0.019) . The employees of station A and station B were the risk factors of occupational stress (=4.681, 1.811, =0.002, 0.067) . The higher detection rate of job stress of workers in the railway stations is correlated with the subjective comfort degree of the working environment of the workers.
为探究火车站工作人员工作压力的影响因素,测量了其工作压力水平,并报告了员工对工作环境的主观舒适度。2019年3月,设计了一项整群抽样研究,收集重庆火车站432名员工的个人特征、工作特征及工作环境主观舒适度。同时,采用付出-回报失衡量表评估工作压力。采用卡方检验比较职业特征等不同分层因素间职业压力检出率的差异。应用Logistic回归分析职业压力的影响因素。火车站工作人员工作压力检出率为31.02%(134/432)。火车站离异员工、月收入低于5000元的员工、工作年限10 - 20年的员工、列车员以及行李员、值班站长、助理工程师等其他岗位员工的工作压力检出率较高(χ(2)=9.61, 14.76, 23.28, 11.06, P =0.008, 0.002, 0.000, 0.011)。工作环境主观感受为不舒适的员工工作压力检出率较高,差异有统计学意义(P<0.001)。结果显示,火车站工作人员的职业压力受其对空气质量、噪声和空间布局的主观感受影响(P<0.05)。职业压力的危险因素为空气质量、噪声和空间布局不舒适(OR =0.571, 0.068, 0.441, P =0.051, 0.054, 0.007)。列车员、其他岗位(行李员、值班站长、助理工程师)是职业压力的危险因素(OR =1.884, 2.703, P =0.065, 0.019)。A站和B站的员工是职业压力的危险因素(OR =4.681, 1.811, P =0.002, 0.067)。火车站工作人员较高的工作压力检出率与员工工作环境的主观舒适度相关。