Department of Kinesiology, University of Waterloo, 200 University Avenue West, Waterloo, ON, N2L 3G1, Canada.
School of Kinesiology, Lakehead University, Thunder Bay, Canada.
Sci Rep. 2022 May 11;12(1):7735. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-11559-0.
The risk of brain trauma has been associated with the rotational kinematics leading to the development of helmets with a variety rotational management technologies. The purpose of this paper was to employ a rotation specific test protocol to evaluate the effectiveness of two of these technologies. Dynamic response of the head was measured to assess the performance of each technology. Three cycling helmets with identical construction were included in this study. One helmet with no rotational technology, an established, commercial technology and a novel helmet rotational technology designed and assembled by the authors were tested. A drop test onto a 45° anvil was used to measure the ability of each helmet to manage the dynamic response of the head form during a series of impacts. The results revealed both rotational helmet technologies resulted in lower peak rotational acceleration and brain strain, however each technology demonstrated unique performance characteristics depending on the impact condition.
与导致头盔产生各种旋转管理技术的旋转运动学相关的脑创伤风险。本文的目的是采用特定于旋转的测试方案来评估其中两种技术的有效性。通过测量头部的动态响应来评估每种技术的性能。本研究包括三个具有相同结构的循环头盔。一个没有旋转技术的头盔,一种成熟的商业技术,以及一个由作者设计和组装的新型头盔旋转技术被测试。使用一个 45°的砧将头盔砸向砧来测量每个头盔在一系列撞击中管理头部动态响应的能力。结果表明,两种旋转头盔技术都导致了较低的峰值旋转加速度和大脑应变,但每种技术都根据撞击条件表现出独特的性能特征。