From the Department of Surgery (T.E.W., N.C.E., K.E.S., H.V.H., A.S., V.N., T.A.P., M.D.G.), University of Cincinnati; and Department of Pharmacy Services (C.A.D.), University of Cincinnati Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio.
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2022 Oct 1;93(4):545-551. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000003673. Epub 2022 May 12.
The goals of sedation in the critically ill surgical patient are to minimize pain, anxiety, and agitation without hindering cardiopulmonary function. One potential benefit of tracheostomy during endotracheal intubation is the reduction of sedation and analgesia; however, there are little data to support this supposition. We hypothesized that patients undergoing tracheostomy would have a rapid reduction in sedation and analgesia following tracheostomy.
A retrospective review of tracheostomies performed at a single Level I trauma center from January 2013 to June 2018 was completed. An evaluation of Glasgow Coma Scale, Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale, and Confusion Assessment Method for the intensive care unit 72 hours pretracheostomy to 72 hours posttracheostomy was performed. The total daily dose of sedation, anxiolytic, and analgesic medications administered were recorded. Mixed-effects models were used to evaluate longitudinal drug does over time (hours).
Four hundred sixty-eight patients included for analysis with a mean age of 58.8 ± 18.3 years. There was a significant decrease in propofol and fentanyl utilization from 24 hours pretracheostomy to 24 hours posttracheostomy in both dose and number of patients receiving these continuous intravenous medications. Similarly, total morphine milligram equivalents (MME) use and continuous midazolam significantly decreased from 24 hours pretracheostomy to 24 hours posttracheostomy. By contrast, intermittent enteral quetiapine and methadone administration increased after tracheostomy. Importantly, Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale, Glasgow Coma Scale, and Confusion Assessment Method scoring were also significantly improved as early as 24 hours posttracheostomy. Total MME use was significantly elevated in patients younger than 65 years and in male patients pretracheostomy compared with female patients. Patients admitted to the medical intensive care unit had significantly higher MME use compared with those in the surgical intensive care unit pretracheostomy.
Tracheostomy allows for a rapid and significant reduction in intravenous sedation and analgesia medication utilization. Posttracheostomy sedation can transition to intermittent enteral medications, potentially contributing to the observed improvements in postoperative mental status and agitation.
Therapeutic/Care Management; Level III.
危重症外科患者镇静的目标是在不影响心肺功能的情况下最小化疼痛、焦虑和躁动。气管切开术在气管插管期间的一个潜在益处是减少镇静和镇痛;然而,几乎没有数据支持这一假设。我们假设接受气管切开术的患者在气管切开术后会迅速减少镇静和镇痛。
对 2013 年 1 月至 2018 年 6 月期间在一家一级创伤中心进行的气管切开术进行了回顾性研究。对气管切开术前后 72 小时内格拉斯哥昏迷评分、里士满躁动-镇静评分和重症监护病房意识模糊评估方法进行了评估。记录了镇静、抗焦虑和镇痛药物的总日剂量。采用混合效应模型评估药物剂量随时间(小时)的纵向变化。
共纳入 468 例患者进行分析,平均年龄为 58.8±18.3 岁。与气管切开术前相比,在气管切开术后 24 小时内,接受这些连续静脉内药物治疗的患者的异丙酚和芬太尼的剂量和人数均显著减少。同样,吗啡等效剂量(MME)的总用量和连续咪达唑仑的用量也从气管切开术前 24 小时到气管切开术后 24 小时显著减少。相比之下,气管切开术后间歇性肠内喹硫平的和氨甲酮的给药量增加。重要的是,气管切开术后 24 小时内,里士满躁动-镇静评分、格拉斯哥昏迷评分和意识模糊评估方法评分也显著改善。与女性患者相比,年龄小于 65 岁和气管切开术前的男性患者的 MME 总用量显著升高。与外科重症监护病房相比,内科重症监护病房的患者在气管切开术前的 MME 用量明显更高。
气管切开术可迅速显著减少静脉镇静和镇痛药物的使用。气管切开术后的镇静可以过渡到间歇性肠内药物,这可能有助于观察到术后精神状态和躁动的改善。
治疗/护理管理;三级。