Suppr超能文献

Observed differences in amikacin pharmacokinetic parameters and dosage recommendations determined by enzyme immunoassay and fluorescence polarization immunoassay.

作者信息

Bleske B E, Larson T A, Rotschafer J C

出版信息

Ther Drug Monit. 1987;9(1):48-52. doi: 10.1097/00007691-198703000-00009.

Abstract

Enzyme immunoassay (EIA) and fluorescence polarization immunoassay (FPIA) methods are commercially available for quantitation of serum amikacin concentration. The purpose of this study was to determine if the two assay methods were comparable and would provide the same estimates for pharmacokinetic parameters and dosage recommendations. A total of 73 amikacin serum samples were used to evaluate the two assay techniques. Forty-four of these samples, obtained from 10 patients, were used to evaluate the comparability of pharmacokinetic parameters and dosage regimens. The correlation coefficient between the two assay methods was 0.98 (y = 1.03x + 0.64). There were substantial differences in assay performance noted in samples less than 10 mg/L, 10-20 mg/L, and greater than 20 mg/L, typical concentration ranges for serum sampling used in pharmacokinetic analysis. A difference of approximately 10% was observed in the determination of amikacin half-life, total body clearance, and dosage calculation. A 7% difference was noted in the volume of distribution. A significant difference (p less than 0.05) in volume of distribution and dosage recommendations was noted. Although the two methods for determining amikacin serum concentrations appear to be interchangeable on the basis of the in vitro comparison, significant differences were observed between the two assays in pharmacokinetic parameters and dosage recommendations.

摘要

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验