Rotschafer J C, Morlock C, Strand L, Crossley K
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1982 Oct;22(4):648-51. doi: 10.1128/AAC.22.4.648.
Radioimmunoassay and enzyme immunoassay methods for analysis of serum gentamicin levels have been shown to be comparable. The purpose of this study was to determine if serum concentration-time data from the same patient assayed by radioimmunoassay and enzyme immunoassay would provide the same estimates for half-life, elimination rate constant, distribution volume, drug clearance, and gentamicin dose. A total of 103 pre- and postinfusion serum samples were obtained from 32 patients. The samples were divided and assayed by radioimmunoassay and enzyme immunoassay. Serum concentration-time data were fitted to a one-compartment model, and kinetic calculations were performed using the method of Sawchuk et al. (Clin. Pharmacol. Ther. 21:362-369, 1977). While good correlation was established between the two assay methods, significant (P less than 0.05) mean differences were seen in distribution volume (25%), gentamicin clearance (15%), and half-life (11%), using the quantitative data from both methods. Because of differences noted in these pharmacokinetic parameters, significant differences were also noted in dosage calculations. We conclude that there are differences in the pharmacokinetic parameters obtained using results from the radioimmunoassay and enzyme immunoassay. These differences also translate into significant differences between dosage recommendations when individualization of the gentamicin regimen is attempted.
已证明用于分析血清庆大霉素水平的放射免疫测定法和酶免疫测定法具有可比性。本研究的目的是确定通过放射免疫测定法和酶免疫测定法对同一患者进行检测得到的血清浓度-时间数据,是否会对半衰期、消除速率常数、分布容积、药物清除率和庆大霉素剂量给出相同的估计值。从32名患者身上共采集了103份输注前和输注后的血清样本。将样本分开,分别采用放射免疫测定法和酶免疫测定法进行检测。血清浓度-时间数据采用单室模型进行拟合,并使用Sawchuk等人(《临床药理学与治疗学》21:362 - 369, 1977)的方法进行动力学计算。虽然两种检测方法之间建立了良好的相关性,但使用两种方法的定量数据时,在分布容积(25%)、庆大霉素清除率(15%)和半衰期(11%)方面观察到了显著(P < 0.05)的平均差异。由于这些药代动力学参数存在差异,在剂量计算方面也观察到了显著差异。我们得出结论,使用放射免疫测定法和酶免疫测定法的结果获得的药代动力学参数存在差异。当尝试对庆大霉素治疗方案进行个体化时,这些差异也会导致剂量推荐之间的显著差异。