• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

应用于儿科急诊护理应用研究网络CT建议的小儿轻度头部损伤:一项审计

Paediatric minor head injury applied to Paediatric Emergency Care Applied Research Network CT recommendations: An audit.

作者信息

du Plessis Jacques, Gounden Sharadini K, Lewis Carolyn

机构信息

Department of Diagnostic Radiology, School of Clinical Medicine, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa.

Department of Emergency Medicine, School of Clinical Medicine, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa.

出版信息

SA J Radiol. 2022 Apr 14;26(1):2289. doi: 10.4102/sajr.v26i1.2289. eCollection 2022.

DOI:10.4102/sajr.v26i1.2289
PMID:35548708
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9082282/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is a common cause of paediatric morbidity and mortality, with higher TBI rates in low- and middle-income countries. Non-contrast brain CT is the gold standard for diagnosing intracranial injuries; however, it exposes patients to ionising radiation. The Paediatric Emergency Care Applied Research Network (PECARN) clinical decision rule (CDR) aids clinicians in their decision-making processes whilst deciding whether a patient at very low risk of a clinically important TBI (ciTBI) requires a CT scan.

OBJECTIVES

To establish whether the introduction of the PECARN CDR would affect CT utilisation rates for paediatric patients presenting with minor blunt head injuries to an academic hospital in Gauteng, South Africa.

METHOD

This was an audit of paediatric patients who presented with minor blunt head injuries and were referred for CT imaging at an academic hospital in Gauteng, compared with PECARN CDR recommendations, over a 1-year period.

RESULTS

A total of 100 patients were referred for CT imaging. Twenty patients were classified as very low risk, none of whom had any CT findings of a TBI or ciTBI ( < 0.01). A total of 61 patients were classified as intermediate risk and 19 as high risk. In all, 23% of the intermediate and 47% of the high-risk patients had CT features of a TBI, whilst 8% and 37% had a ciTBI, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Computed tomography brain imaging may be omitted in patients classified as very low risk without missing a clinically important TBI. Implementing the PECARN CDR in appropriate patients would reduce CT utilisation rates.

摘要

背景

创伤性脑损伤(TBI)是儿童发病和死亡的常见原因,在低收入和中等收入国家TBI发生率更高。非增强脑部CT是诊断颅内损伤的金标准;然而,它会使患者暴露于电离辐射中。儿科急诊护理应用研究网络(PECARN)临床决策规则(CDR)有助于临床医生在决定极低临床重要性TBI(ciTBI)风险的患者是否需要进行CT扫描时的决策过程。

目的

确定引入PECARN CDR是否会影响南非豪登省一家学术医院中因轻度钝性头部损伤就诊的儿科患者的CT使用率。

方法

这是一项针对因轻度钝性头部损伤就诊并在豪登省一家学术医院被转诊进行CT成像的儿科患者的审核,与PECARN CDR建议进行比较,为期1年。

结果

共有100名患者被转诊进行CT成像。20名患者被分类为极低风险,其中无一例有TBI或ciTBI的CT表现(<0.01)。共有61名患者被分类为中度风险,19名被分类为高风险。总体而言,23%的中度风险患者和47%的高风险患者有TBI的CT特征,而分别有8%和37%的患者有ciTBI。

结论

对于分类为极低风险的患者,可省略计算机断层扫描脑部成像,而不会遗漏临床重要的TBI。在合适的患者中实施PECARN CDR将降低CT使用率。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/61fa/9082282/6729dae7a781/SAJR-26-2289-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/61fa/9082282/6729dae7a781/SAJR-26-2289-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/61fa/9082282/6729dae7a781/SAJR-26-2289-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Paediatric minor head injury applied to Paediatric Emergency Care Applied Research Network CT recommendations: An audit.应用于儿科急诊护理应用研究网络CT建议的小儿轻度头部损伤:一项审计
SA J Radiol. 2022 Apr 14;26(1):2289. doi: 10.4102/sajr.v26i1.2289. eCollection 2022.
2
Comparison of Prediction Rules and Clinician Suspicion for Identifying Children With Clinically Important Brain Injuries After Blunt Head Trauma.钝性头部创伤后识别具有临床重要性脑损伤儿童的预测规则与临床医生怀疑程度的比较
Acad Emerg Med. 2016 May;23(5):566-75. doi: 10.1111/acem.12923. Epub 2016 Apr 20.
3
Evaluation of the PECARN rule for traumatic brain injury applied to infants younger than 3 months and creation of a modified, age-specific rule.评估应用于3个月以下婴儿的小儿急诊护理应用研究网络(PE-CARN)创伤性脑损伤规则,并制定一个经过修改的、针对特定年龄的规则。
Eur J Pediatr. 2023 Jan;182(1):191-200. doi: 10.1007/s00431-022-04661-y. Epub 2022 Oct 24.
4
Implementation of adapted PECARN decision rule for children with minor head injury in the pediatric emergency department.在儿科急诊实施改良版 PECARN 决策规则用于治疗轻微头部损伤患儿。
Acad Emerg Med. 2012 Jul;19(7):801-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2012.01384.x. Epub 2012 Jun 22.
5
External Validation of the PECARN Head Trauma Prediction Rules in Japan.日本儿科急诊应用研究网络(PECRN)头部创伤预测规则的外部验证
Acad Emerg Med. 2017 Mar;24(3):308-314. doi: 10.1111/acem.13129.
6
The Effect of Patient Observation on Cranial Computed Tomography Rates in Children With Minor Head Trauma.患者观察对儿童轻度头部创伤行头颅 CT 检查率的影响。
Acad Emerg Med. 2020 Sep;27(9):832-843. doi: 10.1111/acem.13942. Epub 2020 Mar 26.
7
Does implementation of the PECARN rules for minor head trauma improve patient-centered outcomes in a lower resource emergency department: a retrospective cohort study.实施小儿轻度头部创伤的PECARN规则是否能改善资源较少的急诊科以患者为中心的结局:一项回顾性队列研究。
BMC Pediatr. 2020 Sep 17;20(1):439. doi: 10.1186/s12887-020-02328-x.
8
To Scan or Not to Scan: Overutilization of Computed Tomography for Minor Head Injury at a Pediatric Trauma Center.扫描还是不扫描:儿科创伤中心对轻度头部损伤的计算机断层扫描过度使用情况
J Surg Res. 2018 Dec;232:164-170. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2018.06.005. Epub 2018 Jul 5.
9
PECARN Rule in diagnostic process of pediatric patients with minor head trauma in emergency department.PECARN 规则在急诊科小儿头部轻微创伤患者的诊断过程中的应用。
Eur J Pediatr. 2022 May;181(5):2147-2154. doi: 10.1007/s00431-022-04424-9. Epub 2022 Feb 22.
10
Pediatric Emergency Care Applied Research Network (PECARN) prediction rules in identifying high risk children with mild traumatic brain injury.儿科急诊护理应用研究网络(PECARN)在识别轻度创伤性脑损伤高危儿童方面的预测规则。
Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2017 Dec;43(6):755-762. doi: 10.1007/s00068-017-0811-9. Epub 2017 Jun 22.

引用本文的文献

1
Acute Computer Tomography Findings in Pediatric Accidental Head Trauma-Review.小儿意外头部创伤的急性计算机断层扫描结果综述
Pediatric Health Med Ther. 2024 Jun 11;15:231-241. doi: 10.2147/PHMT.S461121. eCollection 2024.

本文引用的文献

1
Appropriateness of computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging scans in a rural regional hospital in South Africa: A 6-year follow-up study.南非农村地区医院 CT 和 MRI 扫描的适宜性:一项 6 年随访研究。
S Afr Med J. 2020 Dec 14;111(1):46-51. doi: 10.7196/SAMJ.2020.v111i1.14860.
2
Head CT overuse in children with a mild traumatic brain injury within two Canadian emergency departments.加拿大两个急诊科中轻度创伤性脑损伤儿童的头部CT过度使用情况。
Paediatr Child Health. 2020 Feb;25(1):26-32. doi: 10.1093/pch/pxy180. Epub 2019 Jan 14.
3
An audit of radiation doses received by paediatric patients undergoing computed tomography investigations at academic hospitals in South Africa.
对南非学术医院接受计算机断层扫描检查的儿科患者所接受辐射剂量的一项审计。
SA J Radiol. 2020 Oct 16;24(1):1823. doi: 10.4102/sajr.v24i1.1823. eCollection 2020.
4
Emergency department management of traumatic brain injuries: A resource tiered review.创伤性脑损伤的急诊科管理:资源分层综述。
Afr J Emerg Med. 2020 Sep;10(3):159-166. doi: 10.1016/j.afjem.2020.05.006. Epub 2020 Jun 16.
5
Children With Minor Blunt Head Trauma Presenting to the Emergency Department.儿童因轻微钝性头部创伤就诊于急诊科。
Pediatrics. 2019 Dec;144(6). doi: 10.1542/peds.2019-1495.
6
The spectrum and outcome of paediatric traumatic brain injury in KwaZulu-Natal Province, South Africa has not changed over the last two decades.在过去二十年里,南非夸祖鲁 - 纳塔尔省儿童创伤性脑损伤的范围和结果并无变化。
S Afr Med J. 2017 Aug 25;107(9):777-780. doi: 10.7196/SAMJ.2017.v107i9.12394.
7
The impact of the introduction of PECARN head CT rules on the utilisation of head CT scans in a private tertiary hospital in Sub-Saharan Africa.佩卡恩(PECAN)头部CT检查规则的引入对撒哈拉以南非洲一家私立三级医院头部CT扫描使用情况的影响。
Childs Nerv Syst. 2017 Dec;33(12):2147-2152. doi: 10.1007/s00381-017-3577-9. Epub 2017 Aug 30.
8
Pediatric Emergency Care Applied Research Network (PECARN) prediction rules in identifying high risk children with mild traumatic brain injury.儿科急诊护理应用研究网络(PECARN)在识别轻度创伤性脑损伤高危儿童方面的预测规则。
Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2017 Dec;43(6):755-762. doi: 10.1007/s00068-017-0811-9. Epub 2017 Jun 22.
9
Effective Radiological Imaging for the Good of Patients: Weighing Benefits and Risks.为患者利益进行有效的放射成像:权衡利弊
World J Nucl Med. 2017 Apr-Jun;16(2):85-87. doi: 10.4103/wjnm.WJNM_105_16.
10
Justification of radiographic examinations: What are the key issues?影像学检查的理由:关键问题有哪些?
J Med Radiat Sci. 2017 Sep;64(3):212-219. doi: 10.1002/jmrs.211. Epub 2017 Feb 11.