• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

佩卡恩(PECAN)头部CT检查规则的引入对撒哈拉以南非洲一家私立三级医院头部CT扫描使用情况的影响。

The impact of the introduction of PECARN head CT rules on the utilisation of head CT scans in a private tertiary hospital in Sub-Saharan Africa.

作者信息

Kobe Isaac O, Qureshi Mahmoud M, Hassan Saidi, Oluoch-Olunya David L

机构信息

Department of Surgery, The Aga Khan University Hospital, P.O BOX 30270-00100, Nairobi, Kenya.

出版信息

Childs Nerv Syst. 2017 Dec;33(12):2147-2152. doi: 10.1007/s00381-017-3577-9. Epub 2017 Aug 30.

DOI:10.1007/s00381-017-3577-9
PMID:28856440
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The decision to order head CT scans to rule out clinically significant traumatic brain injury in mild head injury in children is made on the basis of clinical decision rules of which the Paediatric Emergency Care Applied Research Network (PECARN) CT head rules have been found to be most sensitive.

PURPOSES

The purpose of this study is to determine the proportion of head CT scans done for children with mild head injury and to determine disposition of patients from casualty after the introduction of PECARN head CT rules compared to the period before. The research question is "will introduction of the PECARN CT head rules reduce the proportion of head CT scans requested for children under 18 years with mild head injury at the AKUHN?"

METHODS

A before and after quasi experimental study with a study population including all children under 18 years presenting to the AKUHN with mild head injury and a Glasgow coma scale of 14 and above on presentation. Sample size was 85.

RESULTS

A total of 42 patients files were analysed in the before study while 43 patients were selected for the after study. The median age was 5 years. The proportion of head CT scans reduced from 56% in the before group to 33% in the after group with no missed clinically significant traumatic brain injury. More patients were discharged home after evaluation in the after group (81%) than in the before group (58%).

CONCLUSIONS

The number of head CT scans ordered reduced without missing any clinically significant traumatic brain injury.

摘要

背景

对于为排除儿童轻度头部损伤中具有临床意义的创伤性脑损伤而进行头部CT扫描的决策,是基于临床决策规则做出的,其中已发现儿科急诊护理应用研究网络(PECARN)头部CT规则最为敏感。

目的

本研究的目的是确定为轻度头部损伤儿童进行头部CT扫描的比例,并确定在引入PECARN头部CT规则后与之前时期相比,急诊患者的处置情况。研究问题是“引入PECARN头部CT规则是否会降低AKUHN医院为18岁以下轻度头部损伤儿童要求进行头部CT扫描的比例?”

方法

采用前后对照的准实验研究,研究人群包括所有18岁以下因轻度头部损伤就诊于AKUHN且就诊时格拉斯哥昏迷量表评分为14分及以上的儿童。样本量为85。

结果

研究前共分析了42份患者档案,研究后选取了43例患者。中位年龄为5岁。头部CT扫描的比例从研究前组的56%降至研究后组的33%,且没有漏诊任何具有临床意义的创伤性脑损伤。研究后组(81%)经评估后出院回家的患者比研究前组(58%)更多。

结论

头部CT扫描的开具数量减少,且没有漏诊任何具有临床意义的创伤性脑损伤。

相似文献

1
The impact of the introduction of PECARN head CT rules on the utilisation of head CT scans in a private tertiary hospital in Sub-Saharan Africa.佩卡恩(PECAN)头部CT检查规则的引入对撒哈拉以南非洲一家私立三级医院头部CT扫描使用情况的影响。
Childs Nerv Syst. 2017 Dec;33(12):2147-2152. doi: 10.1007/s00381-017-3577-9. Epub 2017 Aug 30.
2
Validation of the PECARN clinical decision rule for children with minor head trauma: a French multicenter prospective study.小儿轻度头部创伤的PECARN临床决策规则验证:一项法国多中心前瞻性研究。
Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2016 Aug 4;24:98. doi: 10.1186/s13049-016-0287-3.
3
Clinical Decision Rules for Paediatric Minor Head Injury: Are CT Scans a Necessary Evil?儿科小型头部损伤的临床决策规则:CT 扫描是否有必要?
Ann Acad Med Singap. 2015 Sep;44(9):335-41.
4
Implementation of adapted PECARN decision rule for children with minor head injury in the pediatric emergency department.在儿科急诊实施改良版 PECARN 决策规则用于治疗轻微头部损伤患儿。
Acad Emerg Med. 2012 Jul;19(7):801-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2012.01384.x. Epub 2012 Jun 22.
5
External Validation of the PECARN Head Trauma Prediction Rules in Japan.日本儿科急诊应用研究网络(PECRN)头部创伤预测规则的外部验证
Acad Emerg Med. 2017 Mar;24(3):308-314. doi: 10.1111/acem.13129.
6
Impact of the Pediatric Emergency Care Applied Research Network (PECARN) guidelines on emergency department use of head computed tomography at a level I safety-net trauma center.儿科急诊护理应用研究网络(PECARN)指南对一级安全网创伤中心急诊科头部计算机断层扫描使用情况的影响。
Emerg Radiol. 2019 Feb;26(1):45-52. doi: 10.1007/s10140-018-1645-4. Epub 2018 Sep 27.
7
Cost-effectiveness of the PECARN rules in children with minor head trauma.小儿轻度头部创伤中PECAN规则的成本效益
Ann Emerg Med. 2015 Jan;65(1):72-80.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2014.08.019. Epub 2014 Nov 12.
8
Accuracy of PECARN, CATCH, and CHALICE head injury decision rules in children: a prospective cohort study.PECARN、CATCH 和 CHALICE 头部损伤决策规则在儿童中的准确性:一项前瞻性队列研究。
Lancet. 2017 Jun 17;389(10087):2393-2402. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)30555-X. Epub 2017 Apr 11.
9
Comparison of PECARN and CATCH clinical decision rules in children with minor blunt head trauma.PECARN 和 CATCH 临床决策规则在儿童轻微钝性头部创伤中的比较。
Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2019 Oct;45(5):849-855. doi: 10.1007/s00068-017-0865-8. Epub 2017 Oct 25.
10
Application of PECARN rules would significantly decrease CT rates in a Dutch cohort of children with minor traumatic head injuries.应用儿科急诊护理应用研究网络(PECRAN)规则将显著降低荷兰轻度创伤性脑损伤儿童队列中的CT扫描率。
Eur J Pediatr. 2020 Oct;179(10):1597-1602. doi: 10.1007/s00431-020-03649-w. Epub 2020 Apr 28.

引用本文的文献

1
Paediatric minor head injury applied to Paediatric Emergency Care Applied Research Network CT recommendations: An audit.应用于儿科急诊护理应用研究网络CT建议的小儿轻度头部损伤:一项审计
SA J Radiol. 2022 Apr 14;26(1):2289. doi: 10.4102/sajr.v26i1.2289. eCollection 2022.
2
Validation of Pediatric Emergency Care Applied Research Network (PECARN) rule in children with minor head trauma.小儿急诊护理应用研究网络(PECARN)规则在儿童轻微头部创伤中的验证。
PLoS One. 2022 Jan 18;17(1):e0262102. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0262102. eCollection 2022.

本文引用的文献

1
Accuracy of PECARN, CATCH, and CHALICE head injury decision rules in children: a prospective cohort study.PECARN、CATCH 和 CHALICE 头部损伤决策规则在儿童中的准确性:一项前瞻性队列研究。
Lancet. 2017 Jun 17;389(10087):2393-2402. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)30555-X. Epub 2017 Apr 11.
2
A prospective observational study to assess the diagnostic accuracy of clinical decision rules for children presenting to emergency departments after head injuries (protocol): the Australasian Paediatric Head Injury Rules Study (APHIRST).一项前瞻性观察性研究,旨在评估临床决策规则在儿童头部受伤后就诊急诊科时的诊断准确性(方案):澳大利亚儿科头部损伤规则研究(APHIRST)。
BMC Pediatr. 2014 Jun 13;14:148. doi: 10.1186/1471-2431-14-148.
3
Cancer risk in 680,000 people exposed to computed tomography scans in childhood or adolescence: data linkage study of 11 million Australians.
68 万人在儿童或青少年时期接受过计算机断层扫描,其癌症发病风险:1100 万澳大利亚人的数据链接研究。
BMJ. 2013 May 21;346:f2360. doi: 10.1136/bmj.f2360.
4
Radiation exposure from CT scans in childhood and subsequent risk of leukaemia and brain tumours: a retrospective cohort study.儿童 CT 扫描的辐射暴露与随后白血病和脑瘤风险:一项回顾性队列研究。
Lancet. 2012 Aug 4;380(9840):499-505. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)60815-0. Epub 2012 Jun 7.
5
Establishing the quality management baseline in the use of computed tomography machines in Kenya.在肯尼亚建立 CT 机使用的质量管理基准。
J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2012 Jan 5;13(1):3457. doi: 10.1120/jacmp.v13i1.3457.
6
Procedural sedation: A review of sedative agents, monitoring, and management of complications.程序性镇静:镇静药物、监测及并发症管理的综述
Saudi J Anaesth. 2011 Oct;5(4):395-410. doi: 10.4103/1658-354X.87270.
7
Clinical decision rules for children with minor head injury: a systematic review.儿童轻微头部损伤的临床决策规则:系统评价。
Arch Dis Child. 2011 May;96(5):414-21. doi: 10.1136/adc.2010.202820. Epub 2011 Feb 10.
8
Identification of children at very low risk of clinically-important brain injuries after head trauma: a prospective cohort study.头部创伤后临床重要脑损伤极低风险儿童的识别:一项前瞻性队列研究。
Lancet. 2009 Oct 3;374(9696):1160-70. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(09)61558-0. Epub 2009 Sep 14.
9
The impact of traumatic brain injuries: a global perspective.创伤性脑损伤的影响:全球视角
NeuroRehabilitation. 2007;22(5):341-53.
10
Excess lifetime cancer mortality risk attributable to radiation exposure from computed tomography examinations in children.儿童计算机断层扫描检查辐射暴露所致的终生癌症超额死亡风险
Isr Med Assoc J. 2007 Aug;9(8):584-7.