Sydney School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
Australian Centre for Health Engagement, Evidence and Values (ACHEEV), The University of Wollongong, Wollongong, Australia.
Health Expect. 2022 Aug;25(4):1678-1690. doi: 10.1111/hex.13511. Epub 2022 May 12.
Communities with high levels of vaccine rejection present unique challenges to vaccine-preventable disease outbreak management. We sought perspectives of nonvaccinating parents to inform public health responses in such communities.
Nineteen purposively sampled nonvaccinating Australian parents participated in one of seven online dialogue groups. We asked what they thought parents, school principals and public health professionals should do in a hypothetical school measles outbreak and used a framework approach to data analysis.
Parents' views were grounded in strong beliefs in parental responsibility and the belief that vaccines are not effective, thus unvaccinated children do not therefore pose a threat. They then reasoned that the forced exclusion of unvaccinated children from school in a measles outbreak was disproportionate to the risk they pose, and their child's right to education should not be overridden. Nonvaccinating parents judged that all parents should keep sick children at home regardless of disease or vaccination status; that school principals should communicate directly with parents and avoid using social media; that public health professionals should provide information to parents so they can decide for themselves about excluding their children from school; that public health responses should avoid accidental identification of unvaccinated children and that mainstream media should be avoided as a communication tool.
Nonvaccinating parents do not always agree with current Australian approaches to measles outbreak management. Their perspectives can inform approaches to outbreak responses in communities with high levels of vaccine rejection.
We sought input from individuals who did and did not vaccinate on study design in its early phases. Individual conversations were used deliberately as we felt the group advisory situation may have felt less safe for nonvaccinating parents, given the divisive and often hostile nature of the topic.
疫苗抵制率高的社区给疫苗可预防疾病爆发管理带来了独特的挑战。我们希望了解未接种疫苗的父母的观点,以便为这些社区的公共卫生应对措施提供信息。
19 名有针对性选择的澳大利亚未接种疫苗的父母参加了 7 个在线对话小组之一。我们询问了他们在假设的学校麻疹爆发中认为家长、校长和公共卫生专业人员应该做什么,并使用框架方法进行数据分析。
父母的观点基于强烈的父母责任信念和疫苗无效的信念,因此未接种疫苗的儿童不会构成威胁。他们认为,在麻疹爆发时将未接种疫苗的儿童强制排除在学校之外是不成比例的,他们的孩子受教育的权利不应被剥夺。未接种疫苗的父母判断,无论疾病或疫苗接种状况如何,所有父母都应让生病的孩子留在家里;校长应直接与家长沟通,避免使用社交媒体;公共卫生专业人员应向家长提供信息,以便他们自行决定是否让孩子休学;公共卫生应对措施应避免意外识别未接种疫苗的儿童,主流媒体应避免作为沟通工具。
未接种疫苗的父母并不总是同意澳大利亚目前对麻疹爆发管理的方法。他们的观点可以为疫苗抵制率高的社区的爆发应对措施提供信息。
在研究设计的早期阶段,我们就寻求了已接种和未接种疫苗的个人的意见。我们故意进行了单独的对话,因为考虑到该主题的分裂性和敌对性,对于未接种疫苗的父母来说,小组咨询情况可能感觉不太安全。