• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

理解基因组研究中知情同意的关键要素:以乌干达一项儿科艾滋病毒/结核病研究项目为例。

Understanding of Critical Elements of Informed Consent in Genomic Research: A Case of a Paediatric HIV-TB Research Project in Uganda.

机构信息

College of Health Sciences, Makerere University, Uganda.

College of Humanities and Social Sciences, Makerere University, Uganda.

出版信息

J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics. 2022 Oct;17(4):483-493. doi: 10.1177/15562646221100430. Epub 2022 May 12.

DOI:10.1177/15562646221100430
PMID:35548950
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9398965/
Abstract

Several studies have reported inadequate comprehension of informed consent for genomic research. This study aimed to assess research participants' understanding of critical elements of informed consent for genomic research. A cross-sectional survey involving 123 parents/caregivers of children participating in a paediatric genomic TB/HIV study was conducted Only 47.2% of the participants had adequate understanding of consent information. The mean objective (actual) and subjective (perceived) understanding scores were 78.7% and 91.7% respectively. Participants adequately understood most elements of consent however, some elements were poorly understood including foreseeable risks, protection of confidentiality and compensation for research related injury. Overall there was inadequate comprehension of critical elements of informed consent and there was dissonance between actual and perceived comprehension of informed consent.

摘要

一些研究报告指出,人们对基因组研究的知情同意书的理解不够充分。本研究旨在评估研究参与者对基因组研究知情同意书关键内容的理解程度。本研究采用横断面调查,纳入了 123 名参与儿科基因组结核病/艾滋病研究的儿童的父母/看护者。仅有 47.2%的参与者对同意书信息有充分的理解。客观(实际)和主观(感知)理解评分的平均值分别为 78.7%和 91.7%。参与者对同意书的大多数内容有充分的理解,但对一些内容的理解程度较差,包括可预见的风险、保护保密性以及因研究相关损伤的赔偿。总体而言,对知情同意书关键内容的理解不够充分,实际理解和感知理解之间存在差异。

相似文献

1
Understanding of Critical Elements of Informed Consent in Genomic Research: A Case of a Paediatric HIV-TB Research Project in Uganda.理解基因组研究中知情同意的关键要素:以乌干达一项儿科艾滋病毒/结核病研究项目为例。
J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics. 2022 Oct;17(4):483-493. doi: 10.1177/15562646221100430. Epub 2022 May 12.
2
The effectiveness of health literacy interventions on the informed consent process of health care users: a systematic review protocol.健康素养干预措施对医疗保健使用者知情同意过程的有效性:一项系统评价方案
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Oct;13(10):82-94. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-2304.
3
Participants' Understanding of Informed Consent for Biobanking: A Systematic Review.参与者对生物样本库知情同意的理解:一项系统综述
Clin Nurs Res. 2019 Jan;28(1):30-51. doi: 10.1177/1054773817722690. Epub 2017 Jul 26.
4
Discrepancy between participants' understanding and desire to know in informed consent: are they informed about what they really want to know?知情同意中参与者理解和知情意愿的差异:他们是否了解自己真正想知道的内容?
J Med Ethics. 2012 Feb;38(2):102-6. doi: 10.1136/jme.2010.040972. Epub 2011 Jun 27.
5
Voluntariness of consent in paediatric HIV clinical trials: a mixed-methods, cross-sectional study of participants in the CHAPAS-4 and ODYSSEY trials in Uganda.儿科艾滋病毒临床试验中同意的自愿性:对乌干达CHAPAS - 4和奥德赛试验参与者的混合方法横断面研究
BMJ Open. 2024 Mar 1;14(3):e077546. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-077546.
6
Should Feedback of Individual Results be Integrated into the Consent Process in African Genomics? Participants' Views from an HIV-TB Genomics Research Project in Botswana.非洲基因组学中个体结果的反馈是否应纳入知情同意过程?来自博茨瓦纳一个艾滋病毒-结核病基因组学研究项目的参与者观点。
AJOB Empir Bioeth. 2022 Jan-Mar;13(1):48-56. doi: 10.1080/23294515.2021.1941414. Epub 2021 Jul 1.
7
Assessment of Parents'/Guardians' Initial Comprehension and 1-Day Recall of Elements of Informed Consent Within a Mozambican Study of Pediatric Bacteremia.在莫桑比克一项关于儿童菌血症的研究中,对父母/监护人对知情同意要素的初始理解及一日后回忆情况的评估
J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics. 2018 Jul;13(3):247-257. doi: 10.1177/1556264618767780. Epub 2018 Apr 18.
8
Informed consent in pediatric anesthesiology.小儿麻醉学中的知情同意
Paediatr Anaesth. 2017 Dec;27(12):1253-1260. doi: 10.1111/pan.13270. Epub 2017 Oct 26.
9
Evaluation of the quality of informed consent in a vaccine field trial in a developing country setting.在一个发展中国家环境下的疫苗现场试验中对知情同意书质量的评估。
BMC Med Ethics. 2008 Sep 30;9:15. doi: 10.1186/1472-6939-9-15.
10
Participants' recall and understanding of genomic research and large-scale data sharing.参与者对基因组研究和大规模数据共享的回忆与理解。
J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics. 2013 Oct;8(4):42-52. doi: 10.1525/jer.2013.8.4.42.

引用本文的文献

1
Research Participants' Preferences for Individual Results of Pharmacogenomics Research: A Case of a Ugandan HIV Research Institute.研究参与者对药物基因组学研究个体结果的偏好:以乌干达艾滋病毒研究所为例。
J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics. 2023 Oct;18(4):218-232. doi: 10.1177/15562646231187434. Epub 2023 Jul 13.
2
Genetic and Genomic Researchers' Perspectives on Biological Sample Sharing in Collaborative Research in Uganda: A Qualitative Study.遗传和基因组研究人员对乌干达合作研究中生物样本共享的看法:一项定性研究。
J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics. 2023 Jul;18(3):134-146. doi: 10.1177/15562646231171289. Epub 2023 May 7.

本文引用的文献

1
Experiences and practices of key research team members in obtaining informed consent for pharmacogenetic research among people living with HIV: a qualitative study.关键研究团队成员在为艾滋病毒感染者进行药物遗传学研究获取知情同意方面的经验与实践:一项定性研究
Res Ethics. 2022 Jul;18(3):193-209. doi: 10.1177/17470161221076974. Epub 2022 Feb 7.
2
Electronic Video Consent to Power Precision Health Research: A Pilot Cohort Study.电子视频同意用于精准健康研究:一项试点队列研究。
JMIR Form Res. 2021 Sep 8;5(9):e29123. doi: 10.2196/29123.
3
Randomized comparison of two interventions to enhance understanding during the informed consent process for research.随机比较两种干预措施,以增强研究知情同意过程中的理解。
Clin Trials. 2021 Aug;18(4):466-476. doi: 10.1177/17407745211009529. Epub 2021 Apr 23.
4
Researchers' perspectives on return of individual genetics results to research participants: a qualitative study.研究人员对向研究参与者反馈个人基因检测结果的看法:一项定性研究。
Glob Bioeth. 2021 Mar 9;32(1):15-33. doi: 10.1080/11287462.2021.1896453.
5
What constitutes good ethical practice in genomic research in Africa? Perspectives of participants in a genomic research study in Uganda.非洲基因组研究中的良好道德实践包括什么?乌干达一项基因组研究参与者的观点。
Glob Bioeth. 2019 Mar 24;31(1):169-183. doi: 10.1080/11287462.2019.1592867.
6
Participant understanding of informed consent in a multidisease community-based health screening and biobank platform in rural South Africa.南非农村多疾病社区健康筛查和生物库平台中参与者对知情同意的理解。
Int Health. 2020 Nov 9;12(6):560-566. doi: 10.1093/inthealth/ihaa072.
7
Informed Consent Form Challenges for Genetic Research in Jordan.约旦基因研究中的知情同意书挑战
J Multidiscip Healthc. 2020 Mar 5;13:235-239. doi: 10.2147/JMDH.S243669. eCollection 2020.
8
Key Information in the New Common Rule: Can It Save Research Consent?新通用规则中的关键信息:它能拯救研究同意书吗?
J Law Med Ethics. 2019 Jun;47(2):203-212. doi: 10.1177/1073110519857276.
9
The Collaborative African Genomics Network (CAfGEN): Applying Genomic technologies to probe host factors important to the progression of HIV and HIV-tuberculosis infection in sub-Saharan Africa.非洲基因组学合作网络(CAfGEN):应用基因组技术探究撒哈拉以南非洲地区对HIV及HIV-结核病感染进展至关重要的宿主因素。
AAS Open Res. 2018 Jun 21;1:3. doi: 10.12688/aasopenres.12832.2. eCollection 2018.
10
Genomic Literacy and Awareness of Ethical Guidance for Genomic Research in Sub-Saharan Africa: How Prepared Are Biomedical Researchers?撒哈拉以南非洲地区的基因组知识素养与基因组研究伦理指导意识:生物医学研究人员准备得如何?
J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics. 2019 Feb;14(1):78-87. doi: 10.1177/1556264618805194. Epub 2018 Oct 25.