Suppr超能文献

课程设置、教学以及促进青少年罪犯做好大学和职业准备:文献综述。

Curriculum, instruction, and promoting college and career readiness for incarcerated youth: A literature review.

机构信息

Department of Student Development, University of Massachusetts Amherst.

Mary Lou Fulton Teachers College, Arizona State University.

出版信息

Am J Orthopsychiatry. 2022;92(4):418-428. doi: 10.1037/ort0000623. Epub 2022 May 12.

Abstract

Access to high-quality curriculum and instruction is essential for all youth incarcerated in juvenile corrections facilities. In a landmark 2014 collaboration between the U.S. Departments of Education and Justice were established. Principle independent variable (IV) identified the importance of access to rigorous and relevant curricula and evidence-based instruction that promotes college- and career-readiness. To explore research progress since publication of the a systematic review of research was conducted. The review identified eight peer-reviewed studies relevant to curriculum and instruction published since 2014. Employing a variety of research designs, the studies focused on literacy ( = 5) and instruction ( = 3). Quality indicators, based on modified forms of Mulcahy et al. (2016) single case design, Gersten et al. (2005) group design, and Miles et al. (2019) qualitative standards, were used to evaluate the studies. Results revealed a lack of replicable information pertinent to participants and intervention, as well as a lack of fidelity. Of grave concern is that only four of the participants included across all studies were female. Research that adheres to quality indicators, is described with replicable precision, and is representative of females is needed. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA, all rights reserved).

摘要

高质量的课程和教学对于所有被监禁在少年管教所的青少年来说都是至关重要的。在 2014 年美国教育部和司法部之间的一项具有里程碑意义的合作中,确定了获得严格和相关课程以及基于证据的教学的重要性,这些教学可以促进大学和职业准备。为了探索自该研究发表以来的研究进展,对研究进行了系统回顾。该综述确定了自 2014 年以来发表的与课程和教学相关的八项同行评议研究。这些研究采用了各种研究设计,重点关注识字(=5)和教学(=3)。质量指标是基于对 Mulcahy 等人(2016 年)的单一案例设计、Gersten 等人(2005 年)的群体设计和 Miles 等人(2019 年)的定性标准的修改形式制定的,用于评估这些研究。结果显示,缺乏与参与者和干预措施相关的可复制信息,以及缺乏一致性。令人严重关切的是,在所有研究中,只有 4 名参与者是女性。需要遵循质量指标、具有可复制精度并能代表女性的研究。(PsycInfo 数据库记录(c)2022 APA,保留所有权利)。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验