Centre d'Evaluation et Traitement de la Douleur, INSERM U987, Hôpital Cochin, Université de Paris, Paris, France.
INSERM U1107, NEURO-DOL, Université Clermont Auvergne, Clermont-Ferrand, France.
Curr Med Res Opin. 2022 Sep;38(9):1579-1585. doi: 10.1080/03007995.2022.2076475. Epub 2022 May 31.
Paracetamol is the commonest analgesic worldwide in primary care. Despite evidence-based recommendations for management of acute and chronic pain with paracetamol, practices seem to vary considerably in its modalities of use, with or without restrictions, between renowned scientific societies and over time.
Qualitative assessment of similarities, differences, and changes over time in guidelines for paracetamol use in acute and chronic pain.
We focused on two common pain conditions for which paracetamol is widely used: acute migraine and chronic knee osteoarthritis (OA). In 19 guidelines (10 for acute migraine, 9 for chronic knee OA) from 10 scientific societies (AAN/AHS, ACR/AF, CHS, EFNS, EHF/LTB, ESCEO, EULAR, SFEMC, SRF, OARSI) published between 1997 and 2021, methods, results and conclusions were compared, between guidelines and over time.
In acute migraine, there was a shift from no recommendation for paracetamol or recommendation only for mild attacks to recommendation for mild to moderate attacks in updated guidelines, without restriction for use for four of the five scientific societies. In knee OA, although updated guidelines generally used the GRADE system, recommendations remained heterogeneous between scientific societies: recommendation without or with restrictions, or not recommended. Consensus is lacking regarding long-course safety and efficacy in acute pain and pain at mobilization.
Most migraine guidelines now recommend paracetamol for mild to moderate pain. Knee OA guidelines vary on the use of paracetamol: a more holistic approach is needed for this condition, considering patient profile, disease stage, and pain management during physical activity to clarify its appropriate use.
在初级保健中,对乙酰氨基酚是全球最常用的镇痛药。尽管有循证医学推荐用于治疗急性和慢性疼痛,但在著名科学学会之间以及随着时间的推移,其使用方式(有无限制)似乎存在很大差异。
定性评估急性和慢性疼痛中对乙酰氨基酚使用指南的相似之处、差异和随时间的变化。
我们专注于两种广泛使用对乙酰氨基酚的常见疼痛情况:急性偏头痛和慢性膝骨关节炎(OA)。在 10 个科学学会(AAN/AHS、ACR/AF、CHS、EFNS、EHF/LTB、ESCEO、EULAR、SFEMC、SRF、OARSI)发布的 19 项指南(10 项用于急性偏头痛,9 项用于慢性膝 OA)中,比较了方法、结果和结论在指南之间以及随时间的变化。
在急性偏头痛中,从没有对乙酰氨基酚的推荐或仅对轻度发作的推荐转变为对更新指南中的轻度至中度发作的推荐,五个科学学会中有四个对其使用没有限制。在膝骨关节炎中,尽管更新的指南通常使用 GRADE 系统,但推荐仍然在科学学会之间存在异质性:推荐有或没有限制,或不推荐。在急性疼痛和运动时疼痛的长期安全性和疗效方面缺乏共识。
大多数偏头痛指南现在推荐对乙酰氨基酚用于轻度至中度疼痛。膝骨关节炎指南在对乙酰氨基酚的使用上存在差异:需要针对这种情况采取更全面的方法,考虑患者特征、疾病阶段以及身体活动期间的疼痛管理,以澄清其合理使用。