Stevens Institute of Technology, Hoboken, NJ 07030, USA.
Stud Hist Philos Sci. 2022 Jun;93:192-202. doi: 10.1016/j.shpsa.2022.04.002. Epub 2022 May 9.
Studies of communities that produce knowledge about the natural world have largely focused on groups working with or for academic scientists and conforming to the epistemic values of academic knowledge production. This paper details a community that produces natural knowledge outside of those parameters. The reef hobbyist community, a group that works with aquariums as a form of non-professional leisure, has developed historical narratives, publishing standards, and recognized forms of expertise that are not shared by academic scientists. However, their goal is to produce knowledge about coral systems and their hobby has resulted in a wealth of knowledge about coral husbandry. In this paper, I identify the structure of this community, highlight several prominent groups that make up the network of reef hobbyists, and trace the ways that they produce knowledge about the marine environment through their actions. This paper contributes to discussions about diverse ways of knowing and differing forms of knowledge production in the history and philosophy of science. By examining the history and practices of a well-developed knowledge community outside of academic science, I hope to call attention to the ways that philosophers and historians have centered academic science and its structure and use of knowledge, even in conversations about non-professional knowledge producers. This paper pushes scholars to think more deeply about the way knowledge is developed in non-academic groups.
关于产生自然世界知识的社区的研究主要集中在那些与学术科学家合作或为学术科学家工作并符合学术知识生产的认识论价值观的群体上。本文详细介绍了一个在这些参数之外产生自然知识的社区。珊瑚礁爱好者社区是一个将水族馆作为一种非专业休闲形式的群体,已经形成了历史叙事、出版标准和公认的专业知识形式,而这些并不为学术科学家所共有。然而,他们的目标是产生有关珊瑚系统的知识,他们的爱好已经产生了大量有关珊瑚养殖的知识。在本文中,我确定了这个社区的结构,突出了构成珊瑚礁爱好者网络的几个重要群体,并追溯了他们通过行动产生有关海洋环境知识的方式。本文为科学史和科学哲学中关于不同的认知方式和不同形式的知识生产的讨论做出了贡献。通过考察一个发达的、非学术科学领域的知识社区的历史和实践,我希望引起人们对哲学家和历史学家关注学术科学及其结构和知识使用的方式的注意,即使是在关于非专业知识生产者的对话中也是如此。本文促使学者们更深入地思考非学术群体中知识是如何发展的。