• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

重复暴露于递增与恒定惩罚强度对反应分配的影响。

Effects of repeated exposure to escalating versus constant punishment intensity on response allocation.

机构信息

Utah State University.

出版信息

J Exp Anal Behav. 2022 Jul;118(1):59-82. doi: 10.1002/jeab.766. Epub 2022 May 12.

DOI:10.1002/jeab.766
PMID:35553429
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9253053/
Abstract

The present experiment investigated the effects of 1) repeated exposures to escalating punishment intensities and 2) repeated exposure to punishment after periods of vacation on response allocation between punished and unpunished responding in three groups of rats. The first group (intensity + vacation) experienced repeated exposures to escalating punishment intensities after a period of vacation (i.e., return to baseline) from punishment. The second group (intensity-only) experienced repeated exposures to escalating punishment intensities without vacation from punishment. The third group (vacation-only) experienced repeated exposures to a constant punishment intensity after a period of vacation from punishment. Results showed that superimposition of punishment on one of two concurrently available responses decreased allocation toward the punished response and increased allocation toward the unpunished response. Furthermore, greater changes in allocation were observed with the introduction of a moderate constant intensity than with the introduction of a low intensity that increased across sessions. Reexposure to punishment had different effects between the groups. Although there was evidence that high shock intensities can enhance the efficacy of lower intensities to shift allocation away from the punished response and toward the unpunished response, there was little evidence of changes in response allocation with reintroduction of punishment after a period of vacation.

摘要

本实验研究了以下三种处理方式对大鼠惩罚反应分配的影响

1)重复暴露于递增的惩罚强度;2)在假期结束后重复暴露于惩罚;3)在假期结束后重复暴露于恒定的惩罚强度。第一组(强度+假期)在经历一段惩罚假期(即回到基线)后,重复暴露于递增的惩罚强度。第二组(仅强度)在没有惩罚假期的情况下重复暴露于递增的惩罚强度。第三组(仅假期)在经历一段惩罚假期后,重复暴露于恒定的惩罚强度。结果表明,在两个同时存在的反应中叠加惩罚会减少对受惩罚反应的分配,增加对未受惩罚反应的分配。此外,引入中等强度的恒定强度比引入随时间增加的低强度会导致更大的分配变化。在不同的组中,重新暴露于惩罚会产生不同的影响。虽然有证据表明高强度冲击可以增强低强度冲击的效果,从而使分配从受惩罚的反应转移到未受惩罚的反应,但在假期结束后重新引入惩罚时,反应分配几乎没有变化。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/885c/9253053/a993f7f796c8/nihms-1799576-f0004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/885c/9253053/95361906d27f/nihms-1799576-f0005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/885c/9253053/caefa645573d/nihms-1799576-f0006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/885c/9253053/7800afd624f1/nihms-1799576-f0007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/885c/9253053/fa821e3d7910/nihms-1799576-f0008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/885c/9253053/11c8d0e31a76/nihms-1799576-f0009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/885c/9253053/691d24d9a294/nihms-1799576-f0010.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/885c/9253053/6840f1d6ac47/nihms-1799576-f0011.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/885c/9253053/eb22480f3400/nihms-1799576-f0012.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/885c/9253053/99e1cd31b419/nihms-1799576-f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/885c/9253053/2d1395894531/nihms-1799576-f0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/885c/9253053/0d1318e51c13/nihms-1799576-f0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/885c/9253053/a993f7f796c8/nihms-1799576-f0004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/885c/9253053/95361906d27f/nihms-1799576-f0005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/885c/9253053/caefa645573d/nihms-1799576-f0006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/885c/9253053/7800afd624f1/nihms-1799576-f0007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/885c/9253053/fa821e3d7910/nihms-1799576-f0008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/885c/9253053/11c8d0e31a76/nihms-1799576-f0009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/885c/9253053/691d24d9a294/nihms-1799576-f0010.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/885c/9253053/6840f1d6ac47/nihms-1799576-f0011.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/885c/9253053/eb22480f3400/nihms-1799576-f0012.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/885c/9253053/99e1cd31b419/nihms-1799576-f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/885c/9253053/2d1395894531/nihms-1799576-f0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/885c/9253053/0d1318e51c13/nihms-1799576-f0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/885c/9253053/a993f7f796c8/nihms-1799576-f0004.jpg

相似文献

1
Effects of repeated exposure to escalating versus constant punishment intensity on response allocation.重复暴露于递增与恒定惩罚强度对反应分配的影响。
J Exp Anal Behav. 2022 Jul;118(1):59-82. doi: 10.1002/jeab.766. Epub 2022 May 12.
2
A novel operant conflict procedure using incrementing shock intensities to assess the anxiolytic and anxiogenic effects of drugs.一种使用递增电击强度来评估药物抗焦虑和致焦虑作用的新型操作性冲突程序。
Behav Pharmacol. 2009 May;20(3):226-36. doi: 10.1097/fbp.0b013e32832a8110.
3
A facilitative effect of punishment on unpunished behavior.惩罚对未受惩罚行为的促进作用。
J Exp Anal Behav. 1962 Apr;5(2):191-9. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1962.5-191.
4
A comparison of the effects of psychotomimetics and anxiolytics on punished and unpunished responding maintained by fixed interval schedules of food reinforcement in the rat.精神致幻剂和抗焦虑药对大鼠食物强化固定间隔时间表维持的惩罚性和非惩罚性反应影响的比较。
Behav Pharmacol. 2006 Feb;17(1):87-99. doi: 10.1097/01.fbp.0000189812.77049.e5.
5
Effects of some volatile sedative-hypnotics on punished behavior.
Psychopharmacology (Berl). 1984;84(1):16-9. doi: 10.1007/BF00432016.
6
Effects of opiate antagonists and putative kappa agonists on unpunished and punished operant behavior in the rat.阿片类拮抗剂和假定的κ激动剂对大鼠未受惩罚和受惩罚操作性行为的影响。
Psychopharmacology (Berl). 1985;86(4):386-91. doi: 10.1007/BF00427896.
7
Level of punishment determines anticonflict activity of ondansetron in pigeons: comparison with buspirone and diazepam.惩罚程度决定昂丹司琼在鸽子中的抗冲突活性:与丁螺环酮和地西泮的比较。
Pharmacol Biochem Behav. 1998 Dec;61(4):451-7. doi: 10.1016/s0091-3057(98)00131-2.
8
Role of 5-hydroxytryptamine in amphetamine effects on punished and unpunished behaviour.5-羟色胺在苯丙胺对受罚及未受罚行为影响中的作用
Psychopharmacology (Berl). 1983;80(1):78-82. doi: 10.1007/BF00427500.
9
Effects of alcohol on punished and unpunished responding of squirrel monkeys.
Pharmacol Biochem Behav. 1976 Feb;4(2):169-73. doi: 10.1016/0091-3057(76)90010-1.
10
Interaction of buspirone and dopaminergic agents on punished behavior of pigeons.丁螺环酮与多巴胺能药物对鸽子惩罚行为的相互作用。
Pharmacol Biochem Behav. 1986 Mar;24(3):751-6. doi: 10.1016/0091-3057(86)90585-x.

引用本文的文献

1
Effects of pharmacological and environmental manipulations on choice between fentanyl and shock avoidance/escape in male and female rats under mutually exclusive and non-exclusive choice conditions.药物和环境操作对雄性和雌性大鼠在互斥和非互斥选择条件下,芬太尼与回避/逃避电击之间选择的影响。
Neuropsychopharmacology. 2024 Dec;49(13):2011-2021. doi: 10.1038/s41386-024-01939-7. Epub 2024 Aug 5.
2
Abstinence as Choice: Exploring Voluntary Abstinence from Alcohol Self-Administration Using the Resurgence-as-Choice Framework.将戒酒作为一种选择:运用“复现即选择”框架探索自愿戒酒自我管理行为
Perspect Behav Sci. 2024 May 6;47(2):335-363. doi: 10.1007/s40614-024-00405-5. eCollection 2024 Jun.
3
Effects of environmental and pharmacological manipulations on cocaine-vs-negative reinforcer choice in male and female rats.环境和药理学处理对雄性和雌性大鼠可卡因与阴性强化物选择的影响。
Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2023 Aug;240(8):1677-1689. doi: 10.1007/s00213-023-06404-9. Epub 2023 Jun 20.

本文引用的文献

1
Increased responsiveness to punishment of cocaine self-administration after experience with high punishment.在经历高惩罚后,可卡因自我给药的反应性增加。
Neuropsychopharmacology. 2022 Jan;47(2):444-453. doi: 10.1038/s41386-021-01159-3. Epub 2021 Aug 24.
2
Punishment and its putative fallout: A reappraisal.惩罚及其可能的后果:再评价。
J Exp Anal Behav. 2021 Jan;115(1):185-203. doi: 10.1002/jeab.653. Epub 2020 Dec 6.
3
Resurgence of punishment-suppressed cocaine seeking in rats.大鼠中惩罚抑制的可卡因觅求行为的复发
Exp Clin Psychopharmacol. 2020 Jun;28(3):365-374. doi: 10.1037/pha0000317. Epub 2019 Aug 5.
4
Resurgence of a target behavior suppressed by a combination of punishment and alternative reinforcement.由惩罚和替代性强化相结合所抑制的目标行为的复发。
Behav Processes. 2019 May;162:177-183. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2019.03.004. Epub 2019 Mar 9.
5
Multilevel analysis of matching behavior.多层次分析匹配行为。
J Exp Anal Behav. 2019 Mar;111(2):183-191. doi: 10.1002/jeab.510. Epub 2019 Feb 13.
6
Applying mixed-effects modeling to single-subject designs: An introduction.应用混合效应模型于单被试设计:简介。
J Exp Anal Behav. 2019 Mar;111(2):192-206. doi: 10.1002/jeab.507. Epub 2019 Feb 13.
7
Punishment of an alternative behavior generates resurgence of a previously extinguished target behavior.对替代行为的惩罚会导致先前已消退的目标行为再次出现。
J Exp Anal Behav. 2018 Sep;110(2):171-184. doi: 10.1002/jeab.465. Epub 2018 Jul 31.
8
Differential vulnerability to the punishment of cocaine related behaviours: effects of locus of punishment, cocaine taking history and alternative reinforcer availability.对可卡因相关行为惩罚的差异易感性:惩罚位置、可卡因使用史和替代强化物可得性的影响。
Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2015 Jan;232(1):125-34. doi: 10.1007/s00213-014-3648-5. Epub 2014 Jun 21.
9
Brief light as a practical aversive stimulus for the albino rat.简要的光刺激对白化病大鼠具有实际的厌恶作用。
Behav Brain Res. 2010 Dec 25;214(2):402-8. doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2010.06.020. Epub 2010 Jun 19.
10
Asymmetry of reinforcement and punishment in human choice.人类选择中强化与惩罚的不对称性。
J Exp Anal Behav. 2008 Mar;89(2):157-67. doi: 10.1901/jeab.2008.89-157.