Nall Rusty W, Rung Jillian M, Shahan Timothy A
Utah State University, United States.
Utah State University, United States.
Behav Processes. 2019 May;162:177-183. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2019.03.004. Epub 2019 Mar 9.
Differential-reinforcement-based treatments involving extinction of target problem behavior and reinforcement of an alternative behavior are highly effective. However, extinction of problem behavior is sometimes difficult or contraindicated in clinical settings. In such cases, punishment instead of extinction may be used in combination with alternative reinforcement. Although it is well documented that omitting alternative reinforcement can produce recurrence (i.e., resurgence) of behavior previously suppressed by extinction plus alternative reinforcement, it remains unclear if resurgence similarly occurs for behavior previously suppressed by punishment plus alternative reinforcement. The present experiment examined this question with rats. In Phase 1, a target behavior (lever pressing) was reinforced with food pellets. In Phase 2, the target behavior continued to be reinforced, but it also produced mild foot shock and an alternative behavior (nose poking) also produced food. Finally, all consequences were removed and resurgence of target behavior occurred. Resurgence did not occur for another group that similarly received punishment of target behavior in Phase 2 but not alternative reinforcement. These results indicate that resurgence was a product of the history of exposure to and then removal of alternative reinforcement and that the removal of punishment alone did not produce resurgence of target behavior.
基于差异强化的治疗方法,包括消除目标问题行为并强化替代行为,是非常有效的。然而,在临床环境中,消除问题行为有时是困难的或不适用的。在这种情况下,可以使用惩罚而非消除,并结合替代强化。虽然有充分的文献记载,省略替代强化会导致先前被消除加替代强化所抑制的行为复发(即再现),但对于先前被惩罚加替代强化所抑制的行为是否同样会出现再现,仍不清楚。本实验用大鼠对此问题进行了研究。在第一阶段,目标行为(按压杠杆)用食物颗粒进行强化。在第二阶段,目标行为继续得到强化,但同时也会产生轻微的足部电击,而替代行为(戳鼻子)也会产生食物。最后,所有后果都被消除,目标行为出现了再现。另一组在第二阶段同样接受目标行为惩罚但没有替代强化的大鼠,并没有出现再现。这些结果表明,再现是接触并随后消除替代强化的历史产物,仅消除惩罚并不会导致目标行为的再现。