• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

全膝关节置换术后哪些恢复领域很重要?一项基于访谈的定性研究。

What recovery domains are important following a total knee replacement? A qualitative, interview-based study.

机构信息

Clinical Trials Unit, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK

Trauma and Orthopaedics, University Hospitals Coventry and Warwickshire NHS Trust, Coventry, UK.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2024 May 9;14(5):e080795. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-080795.

DOI:10.1136/bmjopen-2023-080795
PMID:38724049
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11086519/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To explore people's views of recovery from total knee replacement (TKR) and which recovery domains they felt were important.

DESIGN

Semi-structured interviews exploring the views of individuals about to undergo or who have undergone TKR. A constant-comparative approach with thematic analysis was used to identify themes. The process of sampling, collecting data and analysis were continuous and iterative throughout the study, with interviews ceasing once thematic saturation was achieved.

SETTING

Tertiary care centre.

PARTICIPANTS

A purposive sample was used to account for variables including pre, early or late postoperative status.

RESULTS

12 participants were interviewed, 4 who were preoperative, 4 early postoperative and 4 late postoperative. Themes of pain, function, fear of complications, awareness of the artificial knee joint and return to work were identified. Subthemes of balancing acute and chronic pain were identified.

CONCLUSIONS

The results of this interview-based study identify pain and function, in particular mobility, that were universally important to those undergoing TKR. Surgeons should consider exploring these domains when taking informed consent to enhance shared decision-making. Researchers should consider these recovery domains when designing interventional studies.

摘要

目的

探讨人们对全膝关节置换术(TKR)康复的看法,以及他们认为哪些康复领域重要。

设计

采用半结构式访谈,探讨即将接受或已经接受 TKR 的个体对 TKR 的看法。采用恒定比较法和主题分析来确定主题。在整个研究过程中,抽样、数据收集和分析是连续和迭代的,一旦达到主题饱和,访谈就会停止。

地点

三级护理中心。

参与者

采用目的性抽样,考虑到包括术前、早期或晚期术后状态在内的变量。

结果

共访谈了 12 名参与者,其中 4 名是术前,4 名是早期术后,4 名是晚期术后。确定了疼痛、功能、对并发症的恐惧、对人工膝关节的认识和重返工作等主题。还确定了平衡急性和慢性疼痛的子主题。

结论

这项基于访谈的研究结果表明,接受 TKR 的患者普遍认为疼痛和功能,特别是活动能力非常重要。外科医生在进行知情同意时,应考虑探讨这些领域,以增强共同决策。研究人员在设计干预性研究时应考虑这些康复领域。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9850/11086519/2ca48af5963f/bmjopen-14-5-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9850/11086519/2ca48af5963f/bmjopen-14-5-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9850/11086519/2ca48af5963f/bmjopen-14-5-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
What recovery domains are important following a total knee replacement? A qualitative, interview-based study.全膝关节置换术后哪些恢复领域很重要?一项基于访谈的定性研究。
BMJ Open. 2024 May 9;14(5):e080795. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-080795.
2
Understanding why people do or do not engage in activities following total joint replacement: a longitudinal qualitative study.探究全关节置换术后人们参与或不参与活动的原因:一项纵向定性研究。
Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2015 Jun;23(6):860-7. doi: 10.1016/j.joca.2015.02.013. Epub 2015 Feb 21.
3
'The unexpected journey': a qualitative interview study exploring patient and health professionals experiences of participating in the knee arthroplasty versus joint distraction study (KARDS).“意外之旅”:一项定性访谈研究,旨在探讨患者和健康专业人员参与膝关节置换术与关节牵伸术研究(KARDS)的体验。
BMJ Open. 2024 Jul 11;14(7):e083069. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-083069.
4
What are the patient factors that impact on decisions to progress to total knee replacement? A qualitative study involving patients with knee osteoarthritis.影响全膝关节置换决策的患者因素有哪些?一项针对膝关节骨关节炎患者的定性研究。
BMJ Open. 2019 Sep 24;9(9):e031310. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-031310.
5
Patients' Views on AI for Risk Prediction in Shared Decision-Making for Knee Replacement Surgery: Qualitative Interview Study.患者对人工智能在膝关节置换手术共享决策风险预测中的看法:定性访谈研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2023 Sep 18;25:e43632. doi: 10.2196/43632.
6
Early recovery following lower limb arthroplasty: Qualitative interviews with patients undergoing elective hip and knee replacement surgery. Initial phase in the development of a patient-reported outcome measure.下肢关节置换术后的早期康复:接受髋关节和膝关节置换手术的患者的定性访谈。患者报告结局测量的初始发展阶段。
J Clin Nurs. 2018 Jul;27(13-14):2598-2608. doi: 10.1111/jocn.14086. Epub 2017 Dec 4.
7
Return to work after knee replacement: a qualitative study of patient experiences.膝关节置换术后重返工作岗位:对患者经历的定性研究
BMJ Open. 2016 Feb 1;6(2):e007912. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-007912.
8
"It's there and I'm stuck with it": patients' experiences of chronic pain following total knee replacement surgery.“它在那里,我被它困住了”:全膝关节置换手术后慢性疼痛患者的体验。
Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2011 Feb;63(2):286-92. doi: 10.1002/acr.20360.
9
Personal meanings in the construction of need for total knee replacement surgery.全膝关节置换手术需求构建中的个人意义。
Soc Sci Med. 2006 Jul;63(1):43-53. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2005.11.054. Epub 2006 Feb 10.
10
Return to work and workplace activity limitations following total hip or knee replacement.全髋关节或全膝关节置换术后的工作回归和工作场所活动受限。
Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2013 Oct;21(10):1485-93. doi: 10.1016/j.joca.2013.06.005. Epub 2013 Jun 15.

引用本文的文献

1
Biopsychosocial Determinants for Total Knee Replacement Decisions Among Older Adults With Chronic Knee Osteoarthritis: A Scoping Review.慢性膝关节骨关节炎老年患者全膝关节置换决策的生物心理社会决定因素:一项范围综述
Geriatr Orthop Surg Rehabil. 2025 Apr 23;16:21514593251335882. doi: 10.1177/21514593251335882. eCollection 2025.
2
Are Current Patient-Reported Outcome Measures Fit for Purpose to Evaluate Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty?当前患者报告的结局指标是否适用于评估单髁膝关节置换术?
J Clin Med. 2025 Jan 2;14(1):203. doi: 10.3390/jcm14010203.

本文引用的文献

1
What's important for recovery after a total knee replacement? A systematic review of mixed methods studies.全膝关节置换术后康复的要点是什么?混合方法研究的系统评价。
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2024 May;144(5):2213-2221. doi: 10.1007/s00402-023-05136-x. Epub 2023 Dec 9.
2
Patient perspectives of pain and function after knee replacement: a systematic review and meta-synthesis of qualitative studies.膝关节置换术后患者对疼痛与功能的看法:一项定性研究的系统评价与元综合分析
Pain Rep. 2022 May 9;7(3):e1006. doi: 10.1097/PR9.0000000000001006. eCollection 2022 May-Jun.
3
Mortality and pulmonary complications in patients undergoing surgery with perioperative SARS-CoV-2 infection: an international cohort study.
围手术期 SARS-CoV-2 感染患者的死亡率和肺部并发症:一项国际队列研究。
Lancet. 2020 Jul 4;396(10243):27-38. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)31182-X. Epub 2020 May 29.
4
Patient experiences of an ankle fracture and the most important factors in their recovery: a qualitative interview study.患者对踝关节骨折的体验及其康复过程中的最重要因素:一项定性访谈研究。
BMJ Open. 2020 Feb 4;10(2):e033539. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-033539.
5
Patients' experiences of discontentment one year after total knee arthroplasty- a qualitative study.患者在全膝关节置换术后一年的不满体验——一项定性研究。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2020 Jan 14;21(1):29. doi: 10.1186/s12891-020-3041-y.
6
A qualitative study of patients' experience of recovery after a distal femoral fracture.患者股骨远端骨折康复体验的定性研究。
Injury. 2019 Oct;50(10):1750-1755. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2019.07.021. Epub 2019 Jul 22.
7
Striving for a silent knee: a qualitative study of patients' experiences with knee replacement surgery and their perceptions of fulfilled expectations.追求无痛膝盖:一项关于患者膝关节置换手术经历及其对期望达成的认知的定性研究。
Int J Qual Stud Health Well-being. 2019 Dec;14(1):1620551. doi: 10.1080/17482631.2019.1620551.
8
Patient Dissatisfaction After Primary Total Joint Arthroplasty: The Patient Perspective.初次全关节置换术后患者的不满:患者视角。
J Arthroplasty. 2019 Jun;34(6):1093-1096. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2019.01.075. Epub 2019 Feb 5.
9
Patient Satisfaction After Total Knee Replacement: A Systematic Review.全膝关节置换术后的患者满意度:一项系统评价
HSS J. 2018 Jul;14(2):192-201. doi: 10.1007/s11420-018-9614-8. Epub 2018 Jun 5.
10
Meeting patient expectations: patient expectations and recovery after hip or knee surgery.满足患者期望:髋关节或膝关节置换术后的患者期望与康复情况
Musculoskelet Surg. 2018 Dec;102(3):231-240. doi: 10.1007/s12306-017-0523-7. Epub 2017 Nov 22.