• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

用于银屑病关节炎的传统合成改善病情抗风湿药:巴西一项以患者为中心的纵向研究的结果与启示

Conventional Synthetic Disease-Modifying Anti-rheumatic Drugs for Psoriatic Arthritis: Findings and Implications From a Patient Centered Longitudinal Study in Brazil.

作者信息

Faria Ronaldo José, Cordeiro Francisca Janiclecia Rezende, Dos Santos Jéssica Barreto Ribeiro, Alvares-Teodoro Juliana, Guerra Júnior Augusto Afonso, Acurcio Francisco de Assis, da Silva Michael Ruberson Ribeiro

机构信息

Pharmaceutical Services Graduate Program, Federal University of Espírito Santo, Alegre, Brazil.

Health Assessment, Technology, and Economy Group, Federal University of Espírito Santo, Alegre, Brazil.

出版信息

Front Pharmacol. 2022 Apr 26;13:878972. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2022.878972. eCollection 2022.

DOI:10.3389/fphar.2022.878972
PMID:35559237
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9086188/
Abstract

Conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs are the first-line treatment to inhibit the progression of psoriatic arthritis. Despite their widespread clinical use, few studies have been conducted to compare these drugs for psoriatic arthritis. a longitudinal study was carried out based on a centered patient national database in Brazil. Market share of drugs, medication persistence, drug costs, and cost per response were evaluated. a total of 1,999 individuals with psoriatic arthritis were included. Methotrexate was the most used drug (44.4%), followed by leflunomide (40.6%), ciclosporin (8.2%), and sulfasalazine (6.8%). Methotrexate and leflunomide had a greater market share than ciclosporin and sulfasalazine over years. Medication persistence was higher for leflunomide (58.9 and 28.2%), followed by methotrexate (51.6 and 25.4%) at six and 12 months, respectively. Leflunomide was deemed the most expensive drug, with an average annual cost of $317.25, followed by sulfasalazine ($106.47), ciclosporin ($97.64), and methotrexate ($40.23). Methotrexate was the drug being the lowest cost per response. Methotrexate had the best cost per response ratio, owing to its lower cost and a slightly lower proportion of persistent patients when compared to leflunomide. Leflunomide had a slightly higher medication persistence than methotrexate, but it was the most expensive drug.

摘要

传统合成抗风湿药物是抑制银屑病关节炎进展的一线治疗药物。尽管它们在临床中广泛使用,但针对银屑病关节炎比较这些药物的研究却很少。在巴西一个以患者为中心的全国性数据库基础上开展了一项纵向研究。评估了药物的市场份额、用药持续性、药物成本及每次反应的成本。总共纳入了1999例银屑病关节炎患者。甲氨蝶呤是使用最多的药物(44.4%),其次是来氟米特(40.6%)、环孢素(8.2%)和柳氮磺胺吡啶(6.8%)。多年来,甲氨蝶呤和来氟米特的市场份额比环孢素和柳氮磺胺吡啶更大。来氟米特的用药持续性更高(6个月和12个月时分别为58.9%和28.2%),其次是甲氨蝶呤(分别为51.6%和25.4%)。来氟米特被认为是最昂贵的药物,平均每年成本为317.25美元,其次是柳氮磺胺吡啶(106.47美元)、环孢素(97.64美元)和甲氨蝶呤(40.23美元)。甲氨蝶呤是每次反应成本最低的药物。甲氨蝶呤的每次反应成本比最佳,这是由于其成本较低,且与来氟米特相比,持续用药患者的比例略低。来氟米特的用药持续性略高于甲氨蝶呤,但它是最昂贵的药物。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6333/9086188/a16a53e7d535/fphar-13-878972-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6333/9086188/32b8b7b03ac7/fphar-13-878972-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6333/9086188/a16a53e7d535/fphar-13-878972-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6333/9086188/32b8b7b03ac7/fphar-13-878972-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6333/9086188/a16a53e7d535/fphar-13-878972-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Conventional Synthetic Disease-Modifying Anti-rheumatic Drugs for Psoriatic Arthritis: Findings and Implications From a Patient Centered Longitudinal Study in Brazil.用于银屑病关节炎的传统合成改善病情抗风湿药:巴西一项以患者为中心的纵向研究的结果与启示
Front Pharmacol. 2022 Apr 26;13:878972. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2022.878972. eCollection 2022.
2
Comparing methotrexate monotherapy with methotrexate plus leflunomide combination therapy in psoriatic arthritis: protocol of a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind clinical trial (COMPLETE-PsA).比较甲氨蝶呤单药治疗与甲氨蝶呤联合来氟米特治疗银屑病关节炎:一项随机、安慰剂对照、双盲临床试验方案(COMPLETE-PsA)。
Trials. 2020 Feb 10;21(1):155. doi: 10.1186/s13063-020-4097-6.
3
Assessing the effectiveness of synthetic and biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs in psoriatic arthritis - a systematic review.评估合成及生物改善病情抗风湿药治疗银屑病关节炎的有效性——一项系统评价
Psoriasis (Auckl). 2015 May 12;5:71-81. doi: 10.2147/PTT.S52893. eCollection 2015.
4
Early Real-World Experience of Tofacitinib for Psoriatic Arthritis: Data from a United States Healthcare Claims Database.托法替布治疗银屑病关节炎的真实世界早期经验:来自美国医疗保健索赔数据库的数据。
Adv Ther. 2022 Jun;39(6):2932-2945. doi: 10.1007/s12325-022-02084-7. Epub 2022 Apr 28.
5
Examining Time to Initiation of Biologic Disease-modifying Antirheumatic Drugs and Medication Adherence and Persistence Among Texas Medicaid Recipients With Rheumatoid Arthritis.调查德克萨斯州类风湿性关节炎医疗补助受助者开始使用生物性改善病情抗风湿药物的时间以及药物依从性和持续性。
Clin Ther. 2016 Mar;38(3):646-54. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2016.01.022. Epub 2016 Feb 18.
6
Medication persistence for psoriatic arthritis in a Brazilian real-world setting.巴西真实世界环境中银屑病关节炎的药物持续性
Future Sci OA. 2019 Jan 18;5(2):FSO369. doi: 10.4155/fsoa-2018-0101. eCollection 2019 Feb.
7
Estimating the cost and health status consequences of treatment with TNF antagonists in patients with psoriatic arthritis.评估肿瘤坏死因子拮抗剂治疗银屑病关节炎患者的成本及健康状况后果。
Rheumatology (Oxford). 2006 Aug;45(8):1029-38. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/kel147. Epub 2006 Jun 16.
8
Comparison between leflunomide and sulfasalazine based triple therapy in methotrexate refractory rheumatoid arthritis: an open-label, non-inferiority randomized controlled trial.来氟米特与柳氮磺吡啶三联疗法治疗甲氨蝶呤难治性类风湿关节炎的比较:一项开放标签、非劣效性随机对照试验。
Rheumatol Int. 2022 May;42(5):771-782. doi: 10.1007/s00296-021-04994-1. Epub 2021 Sep 29.
9
Leflunomide in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis.来氟米特治疗类风湿关节炎
Clin Ther. 2004 Apr;26(4):447-59. doi: 10.1016/s0149-2918(04)90048-3.
10
Leflunomide treatment in elderly patients with rheumatoid or psoriatic arthritis: retrospective analysis of safety and adherence to treatment.来氟米特治疗老年类风湿关节炎或银屑病关节炎患者:安全性及治疗依从性的回顾性分析
Drugs Aging. 2009;26(5):395-402. doi: 10.2165/00002512-200926050-00003.

本文引用的文献

1
Data Sources for Drug Utilization Research in Brazil-DUR-BRA Study.巴西药物利用研究的数据来源——DUR-BRA研究
Front Pharmacol. 2022 Jan 14;12:789872. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2021.789872. eCollection 2021.
2
Brazilian Society of Rheumatology 2020 guidelines for psoriatic arthritis.巴西风湿病学会 2020 年银屑病关节炎治疗指南。
Adv Rheumatol. 2021 Nov 24;61(1):69. doi: 10.1186/s42358-021-00219-y.
3
Medication adherence and persistence of psoriatic arthritis patients treated with biological therapy in a specialty pharmacy in Brazil: a prospective observational study.
巴西一家专科药房中接受生物疗法治疗的银屑病关节炎患者的药物依从性和持续性:一项前瞻性观察研究。
Pharm Pract (Granada). 2021 Apr-Jun;19(2):2312. doi: 10.18549/PharmPract.2021.2.2312. Epub 2021 May 28.
4
Building the National Database of Health Centred on the Individual: Administrative and Epidemiological Record Linkage - Brazil, 2000-2015.构建以个人为中心的国家健康数据库:行政与流行病学记录关联——巴西,2000 - 2015年
Int J Popul Data Sci. 2018 Nov 14;3(1):446. doi: 10.23889/ijpds.v3i1.446.
5
The Epidemiology of Psoriatic Arthritis Over Five Decades: A Population-Based Study.五十年来银屑病关节炎的流行病学:一项基于人群的研究。
Arthritis Rheumatol. 2021 Oct;73(10):1878-1885. doi: 10.1002/art.41741. Epub 2021 Aug 14.
6
Long-term remission and biologic persistence rates: 12-year real-world data.长期缓解率和生物制剂持续率:12年真实世界数据。
Arthritis Res Ther. 2021 Jan 13;23(1):25. doi: 10.1186/s13075-020-02380-z.
7
Psoriatic arthritis treatment patterns and costs among pharmacologic treatment-naïve patients.初治银屑病关节炎患者的药物治疗模式及费用
Am J Manag Care. 2020 Aug 1;26(8):e252-e257. doi: 10.37765/ajmc.2020.44075.
8
First-line csDMARD monotherapy drug retention in psoriatic arthritis: methotrexate outperforms sulfasalazine.一线 csDMARD 单药治疗银屑病关节炎的药物保留率:甲氨蝶呤优于柳氮磺吡啶。
Rheumatology (Oxford). 2021 Feb 1;60(2):780-784. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/keaa399.
9
Methotrexate in Psoriasis and Psoriatic Arthritis.甲氨蝶呤治疗银屑病和银屑病关节炎。
J Rheumatol Suppl. 2020 Jun;96:31-35. doi: 10.3899/jrheum.200124.
10
Challenges in the clinical diagnosis of psoriatic arthritis.银屑病关节炎的临床诊断挑战。
Clin Immunol. 2020 May;214:108390. doi: 10.1016/j.clim.2020.108390. Epub 2020 Mar 18.