• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Case series of unilateral biportal endoscopic-assisted transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion in the treatment of recurrent lumbar disc herniation.单侧双门内镜辅助下经椎间孔腰椎椎间融合术治疗复发性腰椎间盘突出症的病例系列
Am J Transl Res. 2022 Apr 15;14(4):2383-2392. eCollection 2022.
2
[Comparison of unilateral biportal endoscopic transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion versus minimally invasive tubular transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for lumbar degenerative disease].单侧双孔通道内镜下经椎间孔腰椎椎间融合术与微创管状经椎间孔腰椎椎间融合术治疗腰椎退变性疾病的比较
Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2022 May 15;36(5):592-599. doi: 10.7507/1002-1892.202201005.
3
A single-arm retrospective study of the clinical efficacy of unilateral biportal endoscopic transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for lumbar spinal stenosis.单侧双门内镜下经椎间孔腰椎椎体间融合术治疗腰椎管狭窄症临床疗效的单臂回顾性研究
Front Surg. 2023 Jan 23;9:1062451. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2022.1062451. eCollection 2022.
4
[Two different techniques combined with MIS-TLIF in the treatment of degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis:a case-control study].[两种不同技术联合微创经椎间孔腰椎椎体间融合术治疗退行性腰椎滑脱症:一项病例对照研究]
Zhongguo Gu Shang. 2022 May 25;35(5):409-17. doi: 10.12200/j.issn.1003-0034.2022.05.002.
5
Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion using the biportal endoscopic techniques versus microscopic tubular technique.经皮双侧双通道内镜技术与传统显微镜下经椎间孔入路腰椎间融合术的对比研究
Spine J. 2021 Dec;21(12):2066-2077. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2021.06.013. Epub 2021 Jun 23.
6
Minimally invasive versus open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for single segmental lumbar disc herniation: A meta-analysis.微创经椎间孔腰椎间融合术与开放经椎间孔腰椎间融合术治疗单节段腰椎间盘突出症的比较:一项荟萃分析。
J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil. 2022;35(3):505-516. doi: 10.3233/BMR-210004.
7
Safety and Efficacy of Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion Combined with Gelatin Sponge Impregnated with Dexamethasone and No Drainage Tube after Surgery in the Treatment of Lumbar Degenerative Disease.微创经椎间孔腰椎体间融合术联合术后浸以地塞米松明胶海绵不置引流管治疗腰椎退行性疾病的安全性和有效性。
Orthop Surg. 2021 May;13(3):1077-1085. doi: 10.1111/os.12929. Epub 2021 Mar 21.
8
Unilateral biportal endoscopic discectomy versus percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy in the treatment of lumbar disc herniation: a retrospective study.单侧双通道内镜下椎间盘切除术与经皮内窥镜下腰椎间盘切除术治疗腰椎间盘突出症的回顾性研究。
J Orthop Surg Res. 2022 Jan 15;17(1):30. doi: 10.1186/s13018-022-02929-5.
9
[Comparative study of decompression of unilateral biportal endoscopic compared to laminectomy with fusion and internal fixation in the treatment of severe lumbar spinal stenosis].[单侧双门内镜减压术与椎板切除融合内固定术治疗重度腰椎管狭窄症的对比研究]
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2022 Nov 8;102(41):3281-3287. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112137-20220720-01583.
10
[Treatment of grade I and II degree degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis with minimally invasive surgery-transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion under Quadrant channel].[象限通道下微创经椎间孔腰椎椎体间融合术治疗Ⅰ、Ⅱ度退行性腰椎滑脱症]
Zhongguo Gu Shang. 2019 Mar 25;32(3):199-206. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1003-0034.2019.03.002.

引用本文的文献

1
A retrospective study on safety and clinical outcomes of unilateral biportal endoscopic technique for spinal degenerative diseases.单侧双门内镜技术治疗脊柱退行性疾病的安全性及临床疗效的回顾性研究
PeerJ. 2025 Apr 3;13:e19076. doi: 10.7717/peerj.19076. eCollection 2025.
2
Comparative Efficacy of Unilateral Biportal Endoscopy vs Traditional Surgery in Lumbar Degenerative Disorders.单侧双孔内镜与传统手术治疗腰椎退行性疾病的疗效比较
Med Sci Monit. 2024 Dec 14;30:e946468. doi: 10.12659/MSM.946468.
3
Unilateral Biportal Endoscopic Approach for Symptomatic Adjacent Segment Disease: Case Report and Technical Note.单通道双孔道内镜治疗症状性相邻节段疾病:病例报告及技术说明
J Orthop Case Rep. 2023 Dec;13(12):172-177. doi: 10.13107/jocr.2023.v13.i12.4122.
4
Comparing the efficacy and complications of unilateral biportal endoscopic fusion versus minimally invasive fusion for lumbar degenerative diseases: a systematic review and mate-analysis.比较单侧双孔椎间孔镜融合术与微创融合术治疗腰椎退行性疾病的疗效及并发症:一项系统评价与Meta分析
Eur Spine J. 2023 Apr;32(4):1345-1357. doi: 10.1007/s00586-023-07588-6. Epub 2023 Mar 3.

本文引用的文献

1
The Technical Feasibility of Unilateral Biportal Endoscopic Decompression for The Unpredicted Complication Following Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion: Case Report.单侧双孔椎间孔镜减压治疗微创经椎间孔腰椎椎间融合术后意外并发症的技术可行性:病例报告
Neurospine. 2020 Jul;17(Suppl 1):S154-S159. doi: 10.14245/ns.2040174.087. Epub 2020 Jul 31.
2
Lordosis Recreation With PLIF Surgery-What Is the Influence on Adjacent Segment Lordosis?: An Observational Study of Radiological Alignment Change.后路腰椎间融合术(PLIF)后腰椎前凸重建对邻近节段腰椎前凸的影响:影像学矢状位排列改变的观察性研究。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2020 Sep 1;45(17):1178-1184. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000003492.
3
Signal Intensity of Lumbar Disc Herniations: Correlation With Age of Herniation for Extrusion, Protrusion, and Sequestration.腰椎间盘突出症的信号强度:与突出、膨出和游离型椎间盘突出症的发病年龄的相关性
Int J Spine Surg. 2020 Feb 29;14(1):102-107. doi: 10.14444/7014. eCollection 2020 Feb.
4
Recurrent Lumbar Disc Herniation: A Review.复发性腰椎间盘突出症:综述
Global Spine J. 2019 Apr;9(2):202-209. doi: 10.1177/2192568217745063. Epub 2017 Dec 18.
5
A Systematic Review of Unilateral Biportal Endoscopic Spinal Surgery: Preliminary Clinical Results and Complications.单侧双门内镜脊柱手术的系统评价:初步临床结果与并发症
World Neurosurg. 2019 May;125:425-432. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2019.02.038. Epub 2019 Feb 22.
6
Comparison of Postoperative Outcomes Between Primary MIS TLIF and MIS TLIF With Revision Decompression.对比初次微创经椎间孔腰椎间融合术(MIS TLIF)与翻修减压的微创 TLIF 的术后结果。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2019 Jan 15;44(2):150-156. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000002759.
7
Microendoscopic discectomy for lumbar disc herniations.腰椎间盘突出症的显微内镜下椎间盘切除术
J Craniovertebr Junction Spine. 2018 Jul-Sep;9(3):156-162. doi: 10.4103/jcvjs.JCVJS_61_18.
8
Efficacy and Safety of Full-endoscopic Decompression via Interlaminar Approach for Central or Lateral Recess Spinal Stenosis of the Lumbar Spine: A Meta-analysis.全内窥镜下经椎间孔入路治疗腰椎中央或侧隐窝椎管狭窄症的疗效和安全性:一项荟萃分析。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2018 Dec 15;43(24):1756-1764. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000002708.
9
Comparison of Surgical Invasiveness Between Microdiscectomy and 3 Different Endoscopic Discectomy Techniques for Lumbar Disc Herniation.腰椎间盘突出症显微椎间盘切除术与3种不同内镜椎间盘切除术的手术侵袭性比较
World Neurosurg. 2018 Aug;116:e750-e758. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2018.05.085. Epub 2018 May 19.
10
Morphometric Changes of the Lumbar Intervertebral Foramen after Percutaneous Endoscopic Foraminoplasty under Local Anesthesia.局部麻醉下经皮内镜椎间孔成形术后腰椎椎间孔的形态学变化
J Neurol Surg A Cent Eur Neurosurg. 2018 Jan;79(1):19-24. doi: 10.1055/s-0037-1599059. Epub 2017 Mar 20.

单侧双门内镜辅助下经椎间孔腰椎椎间融合术治疗复发性腰椎间盘突出症的病例系列

Case series of unilateral biportal endoscopic-assisted transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion in the treatment of recurrent lumbar disc herniation.

作者信息

Gao Xiangcheng, Gao Lin, Chang Zhen, Hao Dingjun, Du Jinpeng, Wu Jiayuan, Zhao Zhigang, Yang Xiaobin, Hui Hua, He Baorong, Yan Liang

机构信息

Department of Spine Surgery, Honghui Hospital, Xi'an Jiaotong University Xi'an, China.

School of Medicine, Yan'an University Yan'an 716000, China.

出版信息

Am J Transl Res. 2022 Apr 15;14(4):2383-2392. eCollection 2022.

PMID:35559367
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9091115/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To explore the clinical effect of unilateral biportal endoscopic-assisted transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (UBE-TLIF) in the treatment of recurrent lumbar disc herniation (RLDH).

METHODS

The clinical data of 44 patients with RLDH treated by UBE-TLIF in our hospital from August 2020 to December 2020 were analysed retrospectively. The study indicators included intraoperative blood loss, operation time, bed rest time, and hospital stay. The follow-up data included the visual analogue score (VAS) of low back pain, Japanese Orthopaedic Association score (JOA), Oswestry disability index (ODI) score, and the short form 36 health survey questionnaire (SF-36) score preoperatively and 1 week and 6 months postoperatively.

RESULTS

The average operation time was 179.15 ± 42.06 minutes, the average intraoperative blood loss was 132.67 ± 41.92 ml, the average bed rest time was 1.51 ± 0.42 days, and the average hospital stay was 4.82 ± 1.13 days. The VAS score of low back pain after the operation was lower than that before the operation (all P<0.0001). The ODI score, JOA score, and SF-36 scores at postoperative follow-up were significantly different from those before the operation (P<0.05). The satisfaction rate was 86.4% at 7 days after the operation and 95.4% at 6 months after the operation. The proportion of significant clinical efficacy was 18.2% (postoperative day 7) and 63.6% (postoperative month 6).

CONCLUSIONS

UBE-TLIF has the advantages of a rapid recovery, less intraoperative blood loss, a short bed rest and hospital stay, and a good medium-term clinical effect. It is a safe, reliable minimally invasive technique for surgical treatment of RLDH.

摘要

目的

探讨单侧双通道内镜辅助下经椎间孔腰椎椎间融合术(UBE-TLIF)治疗复发性腰椎间盘突出症(RLDH)的临床效果。

方法

回顾性分析2020年8月至2020年12月在我院接受UBE-TLIF治疗的44例RLDH患者的临床资料。研究指标包括术中出血量、手术时间、卧床时间和住院时间。随访数据包括术前、术后1周和6个月时的腰痛视觉模拟评分(VAS)、日本骨科协会评分(JOA)、Oswestry功能障碍指数(ODI)评分以及简短健康调查36项问卷(SF-36)评分。

结果

平均手术时间为179.15±42.06分钟,平均术中出血量为132.67±41.92毫升,平均卧床时间为1.51±0.42天,平均住院时间为4.82±1.13天。术后腰痛VAS评分低于术前(均P<0.0001)。术后随访时的ODI评分、JOA评分和SF-36评分与术前相比有显著差异(P<0.05)。术后7天的满意率为86.4%,术后6个月为95.4%。显著临床疗效的比例在术后第7天为18.2%,术后第6个月为63.6%。

结论

UBE-TLIF具有恢复快、术中出血少、卧床和住院时间短以及中期临床效果良好的优点。它是一种安全、可靠的微创技术,用于RLDH的手术治疗。