Suppr超能文献

警觉家兔在视动刺激期间的头部运动。

Head movements during optokinetic stimulation in the alert rabbit.

作者信息

Fuller J H

出版信息

Exp Brain Res. 1987;65(3):593-604. doi: 10.1007/BF00235982.

Abstract

Pigmented rabbits with their heads free to move about the vertical axis were seated inside a rotating optokinetic drum in order to evoke the optocollic reflex (OCR). At drum velocities below 5 degrees/s, head movements were inconsequential, and eye velocity generally matched drum velocity. At velocities between 5-15 degrees/s head movements were irregular and slight; head velocity was less than 20% of drum velocity, and gaze was undercompensatory by 1-3 degrees/s (retinal image motion of 1-3 degrees/s). At drum velocities above 15 degrees/s, and especially above 30 degrees/s, head movements were substantial (more than 20% of the drum velocity), but gaze was undercompensatory by 60-70% of the stimulus velocity. In the same rabbits in the same test periods and conditions, the vestibulo-collic reflex (VCR) was evoked with vision with minimal gaze undercompensation relative to a stationary surround; however, when deprived of vision the VCR gain dropped. The present results support the notion that with vision, the OCR does not contribute significantly to the improvement of the VCR response, since massive undercompensation of the gaze relative to the rotating drum was required in OCR testing to evoke head movements similar to those seen in VCR tests. Due to many differences in operating characteristics of the vestibular and optokinetic systems, and due to the nature of OCR testing, there were several unexpected results: in some cases head movements did not result in summation of vestibular and optokinetic reflexes, and with sinusoidal drum rotations of about 2 degrees/s2 peak acceleration there was overcompensation (gaze moves faster than the drum) for intervals up to 20 s. Thus, optokinetically generated active head movements could produce behavior strongly contrasting with passively induced head movements in visual-vestibular tests. It is tentatively concluded that in mammals there is a vestigial and specific optokinetic control of gaze and that the optokinetic control of the head is weak (relative to the eyes). However, other non-reflex mechanisms controlling head movements-such as stimulus entrainment and temporal asymmetries in the vestibular and optokinetic reflexes-must also be considered to explain all facets of the data.

摘要

将头部可绕垂直轴自由移动的有色家兔安置在一个旋转的视动鼓内,以诱发视-颈反射(OCR)。在鼓速低于5度/秒时,头部运动无关紧要,眼速通常与鼓速匹配。在5-15度/秒的速度之间,头部运动不规则且轻微;头部速度小于鼓速的20%,注视补偿不足1-3度/秒(视网膜图像运动为1-3度/秒)。在鼓速高于15度/秒,尤其是高于30度/秒时,头部运动幅度较大(超过鼓速的20%),但注视补偿不足刺激速度的60-70%。在相同的测试时间段和条件下,对同一些家兔诱发前庭-颈反射(VCR),相对于静止的周围环境,视觉条件下注视补偿不足最小;然而,当剥夺视觉时,VCR增益下降。目前的结果支持这样一种观点,即有视觉时,OCR对VCR反应的改善没有显著贡献,因为在OCR测试中,相对于旋转鼓,注视需要大量补偿不足才能诱发与VCR测试中相似的头部运动。由于前庭系统和视动系统在操作特性上存在许多差异,并且由于OCR测试的性质,出现了一些意外结果:在某些情况下,头部运动并未导致前庭反射和视动反射的总和,并且在约2度/秒²峰值加速度的正弦鼓旋转时,在长达20秒的时间间隔内存在过度补偿(注视移动速度比鼓快)。因此,视动产生的主动头部运动在视觉-前庭测试中可能产生与被动诱发的头部运动形成强烈对比的行为。初步得出结论,在哺乳动物中存在一种残留且特定的视动注视控制,并且头部的视动控制较弱(相对于眼睛)。然而,为了解释数据的所有方面,还必须考虑其他控制头部运动的非反射机制,如刺激夹带以及前庭反射和视动反射中的时间不对称性。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验