• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

新冠疫情“新常态”下的公私信息共享:理解习惯和结果预期的作用。

Public and Private Information Sharing under "New Normal" of COVID-19: Understanding the Roles of Habit and Outcome Expectation.

机构信息

School of Journalism and Communication, Wuhan University, Wuhan 430072, China.

Sichuan Academy of Social Sciences, Chengdu 610071, China.

出版信息

Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 May 3;19(9):5552. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19095552.

DOI:10.3390/ijerph19095552
PMID:35564950
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9105274/
Abstract

Information sharing is critical in risk communication and management during the COVID-19 epidemic, and information sharing has been a part of individual prevention and particular lifestyles under the "New Normal" of COVID-19. Thus, the purpose of this study was to explore influencing factors and mechanisms in public and private information sharing intention among people under the regular risk situation. This study investigated an information sharing mechanism based on a cross-sectional design. We collected 780 valid responses through a sample database of an online questionnaire platform and utilized partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) to further analyze the data. To explore the difference caused by news frames, we divided respondents into two groups according to the news frame (action frame vs. reassurance frame) and proceeded with the multi-group analysis. The results showed that four types of outcome expectations (information seeking, emotion regulation, altruism and public engagement) and habit had impacts on public and private information sharing intention. Two paths influencing information sharing proposed in this study were supported. The results showed that outcome expectations were positively related to habit, which implies that the cognitive mechanism was positively relevant to the formation of habit. The results proved that habit played a mediating role between outcome expectations and information sharing. This research found that emotion regulation and public engagement outcome expectations only affected two types of information sharing intention mediated by habit. Regarding the role of the news frame, this study found no significant difference between the group exposed to action-framed news and the group exposed to reassurance-framed news. By exploring influencing factors and the mechanism of information sharing under the "New Normal", these findings contribute to understanding of information sharing and have implications on risk management. The proposed mechanism classifying public and private information sharing complements risk information flowing by considering online risk incubation.

摘要

信息共享在 COVID-19 疫情期间的风险沟通和管理中至关重要,信息共享一直是 COVID-19 新常态下个人预防和特定生活方式的一部分。因此,本研究旨在探讨在常规风险情况下,人们公开和私下分享信息的意图的影响因素和机制。本研究基于横断面设计调查了一种信息共享机制。我们通过在线问卷平台的样本数据库收集了 780 份有效回复,并利用偏最小二乘结构方程模型(PLS-SEM)进一步分析数据。为了探索新闻框架造成的差异,我们根据新闻框架(行动框架与安慰框架)将受访者分为两组,并进行了多组分析。结果表明,四种结果预期(信息寻求、情绪调节、利他主义和公众参与)和习惯对公开和私下信息共享意图有影响。本研究提出的两条影响信息共享的路径得到了支持。结果表明,结果预期与习惯呈正相关,这意味着认知机制与习惯的形成正相关。研究结果证明了习惯在结果预期和信息共享之间发挥了中介作用。本研究发现,情绪调节和公众参与结果预期仅影响通过习惯中介的两种信息共享意图。关于新闻框架的作用,本研究发现,接触行动框架新闻的群体和接触安慰框架新闻的群体之间没有显著差异。通过探索新常态下信息共享的影响因素和机制,这些发现有助于理解信息共享,并对风险管理具有启示意义。所提出的将公开和私下信息共享分类的机制通过考虑在线风险孵化补充了风险信息的流动。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d9f2/9105274/288e599d2e3d/ijerph-19-05552-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d9f2/9105274/288e599d2e3d/ijerph-19-05552-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d9f2/9105274/288e599d2e3d/ijerph-19-05552-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Public and Private Information Sharing under "New Normal" of COVID-19: Understanding the Roles of Habit and Outcome Expectation.新冠疫情“新常态”下的公私信息共享:理解习惯和结果预期的作用。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 May 3;19(9):5552. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19095552.
2
Conversations and Medical News Frames on Twitter: Infodemiological Study on COVID-19 in South Korea.推特上的对话与医学新闻框架:韩国新冠肺炎信息流行病学研究
J Med Internet Res. 2020 May 5;22(5):e18897. doi: 10.2196/18897.
3
Social media affordances and information abundance: Enabling fake news sharing during the COVID-19 health crisis.社交媒体的功能与信息丰富性:在新冠疫情健康危机期间助长虚假新闻传播。
Health Informatics J. 2021 Jul-Sep;27(3):14604582211021470. doi: 10.1177/14604582211021470.
4
How does social presence influence public crisis information sharing intention? Situational pressure perspective.社会临场感如何影响公众危机信息共享意愿?情境压力视角。
Front Public Health. 2023 Jul 11;11:1124876. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1124876. eCollection 2023.
5
Public Engagement and Government Responsiveness in the Communications About COVID-19 During the Early Epidemic Stage in China: Infodemiology Study on Social Media Data.中国疫情早期阶段新冠疫情信息传播中的公众参与和政府回应:基于社交媒体数据的信息流行病学研究
J Med Internet Res. 2020 May 26;22(5):e18796. doi: 10.2196/18796.
6
Sharing of Verified Information about COVID-19 on Social Network Sites: A Social Exchange Theory Perspective.社交网站上 COVID-19 验证信息的共享:社会交换理论视角。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Jan 31;18(3):1260. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18031260.
7
Fake news and COVID-19: modelling the predictors of fake news sharing among social media users.假新闻与新冠疫情:社交媒体用户间假新闻分享预测因素的建模分析
Telemat Inform. 2021 Jan;56:101475. doi: 10.1016/j.tele.2020.101475. Epub 2020 Jul 30.
8
Grappling With the COVID-19 Health Crisis: Content Analysis of Communication Strategies and Their Effects on Public Engagement on Social Media.应对新冠疫情健康危机:社交媒体上传播策略及其对公众参与度影响的内容分析
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Aug 24;22(8):e21360. doi: 10.2196/21360.
9
Sharing of misinformation is habitual, not just lazy or biased.错误信息的分享是习惯性的,不仅仅是因为懒惰或偏见。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2023 Jan 24;120(4):e2216614120. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2216614120. Epub 2023 Jan 17.
10
Health Consumers' Daily Habit of Internet Banking Use as a Proxy for Understanding Health Information Sharing Behavior: Quasi-Experimental Approach.将健康消费者的网上银行日常使用习惯作为理解健康信息共享行为的替代指标:准实验方法。
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Jan 8;22(1):e15585. doi: 10.2196/15585.

引用本文的文献

1
How digital leadership impacts community resilience: a moderated mediation model.数字领导力如何影响社区恢复力:一个有调节的中介模型。
Front Public Health. 2025 Jun 16;13:1524985. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1524985. eCollection 2025.
2
Willingness to share information on social media: a systematic literature review (2020-2024).在社交媒体上分享信息的意愿:一项系统的文献综述(2020 - 2024年)
Front Psychol. 2025 Jun 4;16:1567506. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1567506. eCollection 2025.

本文引用的文献

1
The corona chronicles: Framing analysis of online news headlines of the COVID-19 pandemic in Italy, USA and South Africa.《新冠编年史:意大利、美国和南非关于新冠疫情的在线新闻标题的框架分析》
Health SA. 2022 Feb 21;27:1683. doi: 10.4102/hsag.v27i0.1683. eCollection 2022.
2
Risk sharing on Twitter: Social amplification and attenuation of risk in the early stages of the COVID-19 pandemic.推特上的风险分担:新冠疫情早期风险的社会放大与衰减
Comput Human Behav. 2022 Jan;126:106983. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2021.106983. Epub 2021 Aug 14.
3
Psychological distance towards COVID-19: Geographical and hypothetical distance predict attitudes and mediate knowledge.
对新冠病毒的心理距离:地理距离和假设距离预测态度并介导知识。
Curr Psychol. 2023;42(10):8632-8643. doi: 10.1007/s12144-021-02415-x. Epub 2021 Oct 31.
4
COVID-19 as an "Infodemic" in Public Health: Critical Role of the Social Media.新型冠状病毒肺炎疫情期间的信息洪流对公共卫生的影响:社交媒体的关键作用。
Front Public Health. 2021 Mar 18;9:610623. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2021.610623. eCollection 2021.
5
The Public's Risk Information Seeking and Avoidance in China During Early Stages of the COVID-19 Outbreak.新冠疫情初期中国公众的风险信息寻求与回避行为
Front Psychol. 2021 Mar 12;12:649180. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.649180. eCollection 2021.
6
Sharing of Verified Information about COVID-19 on Social Network Sites: A Social Exchange Theory Perspective.社交网站上 COVID-19 验证信息的共享:社会交换理论视角。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Jan 31;18(3):1260. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18031260.
7
What social media told us in the time of COVID-19: a scoping review.社交媒体在 COVID-19 大流行期间告诉了我们什么:范围综述。
Lancet Digit Health. 2021 Mar;3(3):e175-e194. doi: 10.1016/S2589-7500(20)30315-0. Epub 2021 Jan 28.
8
Social Media Activities, Emotion Regulation Strategies, and Their Interactions on People's Mental Health in COVID-19 Pandemic.社交媒体活动、情绪调节策略及其在 COVID-19 大流行期间对人们心理健康的相互影响。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Dec 1;17(23):8931. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17238931.
9
COVID-19 pandemic and information diffusion analysis on Twitter.新冠疫情与推特上的信息传播分析
Proc Assoc Inf Sci Technol. 2020;57(1):e252. doi: 10.1002/pra2.252. Epub 2020 Oct 22.
10
Importance of effective communication during COVID-19 infodemic.COVID-19信息疫情期间有效沟通的重要性。
J Family Med Prim Care. 2020 Aug 25;9(8):3793-3796. doi: 10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_719_20. eCollection 2020 Aug.