Woolworths Centre for Childhood Nutrition Research, Faculty of Health, Queensland University of Technology, Graham St, South Brisbane 4101, Australia.
School of Exercise and Nutrition Sciences, Faculty of Health, Queensland University of Technology, Victoria Park Rd, Kelvin Grove 4059, Australia.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 May 5;19(9):5604. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19095604.
Parental feeding practices and styles influence child diet quality and growth. The extent to which these factors have been assessed in the context of disadvantage, particularly household food insecurity (HFI), is unknown. This is important, as interventions designed to increase responsive practices and styles may not consider the unique needs of families with HFI. To address this gap, a scoping review of studies published from 1990 to July 2021 in three electronic databases was conducted. A priori inclusion criteria were, population: families with children aged 0-5 years experiencing food insecurity and/or disadvantage; concept: parental feeding practices/behaviours/style; and context: high income countries. The search identified 12,950 unique papers, 504 full-text articles were screened and 131 met the inclusion criteria. Almost all the studies (91%) were conducted in the United States with recruitment via existing programs for families on low incomes. Only 27 papers assessed feeding practices or styles in the context of HFI. Of the eleven interventions identified, two assessed the proportion of participants who were food insecure. More research is required in families outside of the United States, with an emphasis on comprehensive and valid measures of HFI and feeding practices. Intervention design should be sensitive to factors associated with poverty, including food insecurity.
父母的喂养方式和风格会影响孩子的饮食质量和成长。在不利环境下,特别是在家庭食物不安全的情况下,这些因素在多大程度上得到了评估,目前还不得而知。这一点很重要,因为旨在增加回应性实践和风格的干预措施可能没有考虑到有家庭食物不安全的家庭的独特需求。为了解决这一差距,对从 1990 年到 2021 年 7 月在三个电子数据库中发表的研究进行了范围综述。事先确定的纳入标准为:人口:0-5 岁儿童经历食物不安全和/或劣势的家庭;概念:父母喂养实践/行为/风格;和背景:高收入国家。搜索确定了 12950 篇独特的论文,筛选了 504 篇全文文章,有 131 篇符合纳入标准。几乎所有的研究(91%)都是在美国进行的,通过现有的低收入家庭项目招募参与者。只有 27 篇论文在家庭食物不安全的背景下评估了喂养实践或风格。在所确定的 11 项干预措施中,有两项评估了参与者中食物不安全的比例。需要在美国以外的家庭中进行更多的研究,重点是全面和有效的家庭食物不安全和喂养实践的衡量标准。干预设计应考虑到与贫困相关的因素,包括食物不安全。