Suppr超能文献

澳大利亚有粮食不安全和家庭混乱问题的幼儿家长所采用的喂养方式。

Feeding Practices Used by Australian Parents of Young Children Living With Food Insecurity and Household Chaos.

作者信息

Nambiar Smita, Stanley Lauren, Miller Lily, Byrne Rebecca A, Gallegos Danielle, Penny Robyn A, Baxter Kimberley A

机构信息

School of Exercise and Nutrition Sciences, Faculty of Health, Queensland University of Technology, Kelvin Grove, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.

Centre for Child Nutrition Research, Faculty of Health, Queensland University of Technology, South Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.

出版信息

Matern Child Nutr. 2025 Apr;21(2):e13770. doi: 10.1111/mcn.13770. Epub 2024 Nov 25.

Abstract

Responsive feeding practices are crucial for developing healthy eating behaviours in children. However, chaotic households and financial stress may disrupt these practices. This cross-sectional study aimed to characterise feeding practices among Australian parents experiencing financial hardship. Parents of children aged 5-35 months, who identified as experiencing financial hardship, completed an online questionnaire from October 2021 to June 2022. Validated tools gathered data on feeding practices, mealtime structure and environment, household chaos (HC), household food insecurity (HFI) and sociodemographic characteristics. Bivariate correlations and hierarchical regression assessed relationships between these variables, adjusted for parent age, education and number of children. Data from 213 parent-child dyads were analysed (97% mothers, median age = 31 years, IQR 28-36; 50% boys, median age = 12 months, IQR 8-17). Median HC score was 4 (IQR 2-7). Seventy-six percent of families reported experiencing HFI (median = 6, IQR 3-9). Over 80% of parents often or always ate meals as a family and never or rarely engaged in 'parent-led' feeding (median = 1.75, IQR 1.00-2.50), or used '(non)-food as reward' (median = 1.33, IQR 1.00-2.00). '(Non)-food as reward' was positively correlated with HC (p = 0.016), and 'food to calm' was positively associated with HC (p = 0.004). 'Feeding on demand' was negatively associated with HC and HFI (p = 0.002). 'Persuasive feeding' was not associated with either. Findings suggest that HC had more influence than HFI on some nonresponsive feeding practices. Increasing levels of HC and HFI may result in less structured mealtimes. Interventions must consider how financial hardship, HFI and HC can impact parents' ability to engage in responsive feeding practices. This cross-sectional study examined feeding practices among Australian parents facing financial hardship. Over 75% were food insecure. While the meal environment supported responsive feeding, increasing household chaos and food insecurity led to fewer structured mealtimes and household chaos increased coercive practices such as using (non)-food rewards and food to calm.

摘要

响应式喂养方式对于培养儿童健康的饮食行为至关重要。然而,家庭混乱和经济压力可能会扰乱这些方式。这项横断面研究旨在描述澳大利亚面临经济困难的父母的喂养方式。2021年10月至2022年6月期间,5至35个月大儿童的父母若自认为正经历经济困难,则需完成一份在线问卷。经过验证的工具收集了有关喂养方式、用餐结构和环境、家庭混乱(HC)、家庭粮食不安全(HFI)以及社会人口学特征的数据。双变量相关性和分层回归分析评估了这些变量之间的关系,并根据父母年龄、教育程度和子女数量进行了调整。对来自213对亲子的数据进行了分析(97%为母亲,年龄中位数 = 31岁,四分位间距28 - 36;50%为男孩,年龄中位数 = 12个月,四分位间距8 - 17)。家庭混乱得分中位数为4(四分位间距2 - 7)。76%的家庭报告经历过家庭粮食不安全(中位数 = 6,四分位间距3 - 9)。超过80%的父母经常或总是与家人一起用餐,从不或很少采用“家长主导”的喂养方式(中位数 = 1.75,四分位间距1.00 - 2.50),或使用“(非)食物作为奖励”(中位数 = 1.33,四分位间距1.00 - 2.00)。“(非)食物作为奖励”与家庭混乱呈正相关(p = 0.016),“用食物安抚”与家庭混乱呈正相关(p = 0.004)。“按需喂养”与家庭混乱和家庭粮食不安全呈负相关(p = 0.002)。“劝说式喂养”与两者均无关联。研究结果表明,在一些非响应式喂养方式上,家庭混乱比家庭粮食不安全的影响更大。家庭混乱和家庭粮食不安全程度的增加可能导致用餐时间结构更少。干预措施必须考虑经济困难、家庭粮食不安全和家庭混乱如何影响父母采取响应式喂养方式的能力。这项横断面研究调查了澳大利亚面临经济困难的父母的喂养方式。超过75%的家庭粮食不安全。虽然用餐环境支持响应式喂养,但家庭混乱和粮食不安全程度的增加导致用餐时间结构减少,家庭混乱增加了诸如使用(非)食物奖励和用食物安抚等强制性做法。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6344/11956056/dd0127102b9c/MCN-21-e13770-g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验