Choi Kyung-Eun Anna, Lindert Lara, Schlomann Lara, Pfaff Holger
Center for Health Services Research, Brandenburg Medical School Theodor Fontane, Fehrbelliner Str. 38, 16816 Neuruppin, Germany.
Institute of Medical Sociology, Health Services Research and Rehabilitation Science, Faculty of Medicine, University Hospital Cologne, Faculty of Human Sciences, University of Cologne, Eupener Str. 129, 50933 Cologne, Germany.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 May 9;19(9):5782. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19095782.
Up to 50% of unsuccessful implementations of organizational change are due to a lack of organizational readiness for change (ORC). This qualitative study aims to investigate the experiences of occupational physicians (OPs) and staff of test and training centers (ETTCs) with team effectiveness in the context of ORC. The change setting is the implementation of a new occupational health program in a multicentric randomized controlled trial for musculoskeletal disorders (MSD) in Germany. Two rounds of expert interviews with OPs (1st round: = 10, 2nd round: = 13) and one round of expert interviews with ETTCs ( = 9) were conducted and analyzed with a deductive-inductive procedure. The focus of the analysis was the assessment of change commitment and change efficacy, as well as their influence on general ORC on a collective level according to Weiner's model (2009). Differential critical assessment of change by the care providers led to a missing collective change commitment and consequently to a missing organizational change commitment. Main inhibiting factors include lacking feedback about (e.g., recruitment) success, limited time resources of and narrow communication between responsible study staff, along with a low rate of utilization and limited adherence of the study population. Main facilitators include standardized procedures and documentation along with easy-access digital tools. Researchers may use the findings to improve the development of new intervention studies, especially in a randomized setting.
高达50%的组织变革实施失败是由于缺乏组织变革准备度(ORC)。这项定性研究旨在调查职业医师(OP)以及测试与培训中心(ETTC)工作人员在ORC背景下对团队有效性的体验。变革背景是德国一项针对肌肉骨骼疾病(MSD)的多中心随机对照试验中一项新的职业健康计划的实施。对职业医师进行了两轮专家访谈(第一轮:n = 10,第二轮:n = 13),对测试与培训中心进行了一轮专家访谈(n = 9),并采用演绎-归纳程序进行分析。分析重点是根据韦纳模型(2009年)在集体层面评估变革承诺和变革效能,以及它们对总体ORC的影响。护理提供者对变革的批判性评估存在差异,导致缺乏集体变革承诺,进而导致缺乏组织变革承诺。主要抑制因素包括缺乏(如招聘方面的)成功反馈、负责研究的工作人员时间资源有限以及沟通不畅,同时研究人群的利用率低和依从性有限。主要促进因素包括标准化程序和文档以及易于使用的数字工具。研究人员可利用这些发现改进新干预研究的开展,尤其是在随机环境中。